UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  x                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
 1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

  

 

 2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

  

 

 3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

  

 

 4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

  

 

 5) Total fee paid:
  
  

 

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

  

 

 2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

  

 

 3) 

Filing Party:

 

 

  

 

 4) 

Date Filed:

 

 

  

 

 

SEC 1913 (02-02)    

  Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required torespond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

 

 

 

 


ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION

401 N. Main St.

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held May 1, 20127, 2013

Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Isabella Bank Corporation will be held on Tuesday, May 1, 20127, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan. The meeting is for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following items of business:

1. The election of threefour directors.

2. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed March 28, 201226, 2013 as the record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please date and sign the enclosed proxy form, indicate your choice with respect to the matters to be voted upon, and return it promptly in the enclosed envelope. Note that if stock is held in more than one name, all parties should sign the proxy form.

By order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGO

Debra Campbell, Secretary

Dated: March 28, 2012April 11, 2013


ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION

401 N. Main StSt.

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

PROXY STATEMENT

General Information

As used in this Proxy Statement, references to the “Corporation”, “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms refer solely to the parent holding company, Isabella Bank Corporation. References to the “Consolidated Corporation” refer to consolidated entity consisting of Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries, and references to “Isabella Bank” or the “Bank” refer to Isabella Bank Corporation’s subsidiary, Isabella Bank.

This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies, by the Board of Directors of Isabella Bank Corporation (the Corporation), a Michigan financial holding company, to be voted at theour Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Corporation(the “Annual Meeting”) which is to be held on Tuesday, May 1, 20127, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, or at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and in this Proxy Statement.

This Proxy Statement has been mailed on April 5, 201211, 2013 to all holders of record of common stock as of the record date. If a shareholder’s shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, then that party should give the shareholder instructions for voting the shareholder’s shares.

Voting at the Meeting

The Board of Directors of the Corporation hasWe have fixed the close of business on March 28, 201226, 2013 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment thereof. The Corporation hasWe have only one class of common stock and no preferred stock. As of March 28, 2012,26, 2013, there were 7,614,7427,670,669 shares of common stock of the Corporation outstanding. Each outstanding share entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each separate matter presented for vote at the meeting. ShareholdersYou may vote on matters that are properly presented at the meetingAnnual Meeting by either attending the meeting and casting a vote, or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy. If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned, it may be revoked by you at any time before it is exercised at the meeting. All shareholdersAnnual Meeting. You are encouraged to date and sign the enclosed proxy, indicate theiryour choice, with respect to the matters to be voted upon, and return it to the Corporation.us.

The CorporationWe will hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders if holders of a majority of the Corporation’s shares of common stock entitled to vote are represented in person or by proxy at the meeting.proxy. If a shareholder signsyou sign and returnsreturn the proxy, those shares will be counted to determine whether the Corporation hasif there is a quorum, even if the shareholder abstainsyou abstain or failsfail to vote on any of the proposals listed on the proxy.proposals.

A shareholder’sYour broker may not vote on the election of directors if the shareholder doesyou do not furnish instructions for such proposals. A shareholderYou should use the voting instruction card provided by the institution that holds his or her sharesus to instruct the broker to vote the shares, or else the shareholder’syour shares will be considered “broker non-votes.”

Broker non-votes are shares held by brokers or nominees as to which voting instructions have not been received from the shares’ beneficial ownersowner or the personsindividual entitled to vote those shares and the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power under rules applicable to broker-dealers. Under these rules, proposal oneProposal 1 is not an item on which brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on your behalf of their clients if such clientsunless you have not furnished voting instructions.

At this year’s annual meeting, shareholdersAnnual Meeting, you will elect threefour directors to serve for a term of three years. In voting on the election of directors, a shareholderYou may vote in favor, of the nominees, vote against, or withhold votes as tofor any or all nominees, or vote against or withhold votes as to specific nominees. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. This means that the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected. Shares not voted, including broker non-votes, have no effect on the election of directors.elections.

Proposal 1-Election of Directors

TheOn December 19, 2012, James C. Fabiano and Dale D. Weburg retired from the Board of Directors currently consists(the “Board”) and the number of 12 members anddirectors was reduced to 12. The Board is divided into three classes, with the directors in each class being elected for a term of three years. On April 27, 2011, Dianne C. Morey resigned as a member of the Corporation’s Board of Directors and the number of directors was reduced to 12. At the 2012 Annual Meeting, of Shareholders three directors, Richard J. Barz, SandraThomas L. Caul,Kleinhardt, Joseph LaFramboise, Wilson C. Lauer, and W. Michael McGuire,Sarah R. Opperman, whose terms expire at the annual meeting,Annual Meeting, have been nominated for election through 20152016 for the reasons described below.


Except as otherwise specified, in the proxy, proxies will be voted for election of the threefour nominees. If a nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve, proxies will be voted for such other person, if any, as shall be designated by the Board of Directors.designated. However, the Corporation’s management now knowswe know of no reason to anticipate that this will occur. The threefour nominees for election as directors who receive the greatest number of votes cast will be elected directors. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected.

Nominees for election and current directors, are listed below. Also shown for each nominee and each current director is his or herincluding their principal occupation for the last five or more years, age, and length of service as a director, of the Corporation.are listed below.

The Board of DirectorsWe unanimously recommendsrecommend that shareholdersyou vote FOR the election of each of the three director nominees nominated by the Board of Directors.nominees.

Director’sDirector Qualifications

TheBoard members of the Corporation’s Board of Directors (the Board) are all wellhighly qualified to serve on the Board and represent our shareholders’your best interest. As described below, under the caption “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”, the Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”)interests. We select nominees to the Board to establish a Board that is comprised of members who:

 

Have extensive business leadership

 

Bring a diverse perspective and experience

 

Are independent and collegial

 

Have high ethical standards and have demonstrated sound business judgment

 

Are willing and able to commit the significant time and effort to effectively fulfill their responsibilities

 

Are active in and knowledgeable of their respective communities

Each nominee and current director nominee along with the other directors bringspossess these qualifications to the Board. They providequalities and provides a diverse complement of specific business skills, experience, and knowledge including extensive financial and accounting experience, knowledge of banking, small business operating experience, and specific knowledge of customer market segments including agriculture, oil and gas, health care, food and beverage, manufacturing, and retail.

The following describes the key qualifications each director brings to the Board, in addition to the general qualifications described above and the information included in the biographical summaries provided below.

 

Director

 Professional
Standing
in Chosen
Field
  Expertise
in  financial
or related
field
  Audit
Committee
Financial
Expert
  Civic and
community
involvement
  Leadership
and team
building
skills
  Diversity
by race,
gender, or
cultural
  Geo-
graphical
diversity
  Finance  Tech-
nology
  Market-
ing
  Govern-
ance
  Entre-
preneurial
skills
  Human
Resources
  Bank
business
segment
represent-
ation
 

David J. Maness

  X      X    X       X      X     X  

Dennis P. Angner

  XX   X     X    X      X    X     X     

Jeffrey J. Barnes

  X      X    X     X        X     X  

Richard J. Barz

  X    X     X    X      X     X      X   

Sandra L. Caul

  X      X    X    X          X    X  

James C. Fabiano

XXXXXXXX

G. Charles Hubscher

  X    X     X    X          X     X  

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

  X      X    X     X      X     X     X  

Joseph LaFramboise

  X      X    X     X      X      

Wilson C. Lauer

XXXXXX

W. Joseph Manifold

  X    X    X    X    X      X    X       

W. Michael McGuire

  X    X    X    X    X     X    X    X     X     

Dale D. WeburgSarah R. Opperman

  X      X    X   X  X     X   X     X  

The following table identifies the individual Board members of our Board serving on each of theseour standing committees:

 

      Nominating  Compensation 
      and Corporate  and Human 

Director

  Audit  Governance  Resource 

David J. Maness

   Xo   Xo   Xco 

Dennis P. Angner

    

Jeffrey J. Barnes

   X     X  

Richard J. Barz

    

Sandra L. Caul

     X  

James C. Fabiano

X

G. Charles Hubscher

   X     X  

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

     X  

Joseph LaFramboise

   X    X  X

Wilson C. Lauer

  X  

W. Joseph Manifold

   Xc   X    X  

W. Michael McGuire

   X    Xc   X  

Dale D. WeburgSarah R. Opperman

     X  

C — Chairperson

    

O — Ex-Officio

    

Director Nominees for Terms Ending in 20152016

Richard J. Barz (age 63) has been a director of Isabella Bank (the Bank) since 2000 and of the Corporation since 2002. Mr. Barz has been employed by the Corporation since 1972 and has been Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since January 1, 2010 and President and CEO of the Bank since December 2001. Mr. Barz has been very active in community organizations and events. He is the past chairman of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, is the current chairman of the Middle Michigan Development Corporation Board of Directors, and serves on several boards and committees for Central Michigan University and various volunteer organizations throughout mid-Michigan.

SandraThomas L. Caul (age 68) has been a director of the Bank since 1994 and of the Corporation since 2005. Ms. Caul is Vice Chairperson of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Mid Michigan Community College Advisory Board, a board member for Central Michigan Community Mental Health Facilities, a member of the Central Michigan Health Advisory Board for Central Michigan University and Chairperson for the Central Michigan University College of Medicine regional division fund raising effort. She also sits on the board of the Central Michigan American Red Cross. Ms. Caul retired in January 2005 as a state representative of the Michigan State House of Representatives. Ms. Caul is a registered nurse.

W. Michael McGuire (age 62) has been a director of the Corporation since 2007 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. He is a director of the Farwell Division of the Bank. Mr. McGuire is currently an attorney and the Director of the Office of the Corporate Secretary and Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products, headquartered in Midland, Michigan.

Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2014

Dennis P. Angner (age 56) has been a director of the Corporation and the Bank since 2000. Mr. Angner has been principally employed by the Corporation since 1984 and has served as President of the Corporation since December 30, 2001 and CFO since January 1, 2010. Mr. Angner served as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation from December 30, 2001 through December 31, 2009. He is the past Chair of the Michigan Bankers Association and is currently serving as vice chairman of its taxation committee, is a member of the American Bankers Association Government Relations Council, and served on the Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.

Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes (age 49) has been a director of the Bank since September 2007 and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. Dr. Barnes is a physician and co-owner of Central Eye Consultants. He is a former member of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors.

G. Charles HubscherKleinhardt (age 58) has been a director of the Bank since May 2004 and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. Mr. Hubscher is the President of Hubscher and Son, Inc., a sand and gravel producer. He is a director of the National Stone and Gravel Association, the Michigan Aggregates Association, serves on the Board of Trustees for the Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation, and is a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals for Deerfield Township.

David J. Maness (age 58) has been a director of the Bank since 2003 and of the Corporation since 2004. Mr. Maness was elected chairman of the board for the Corporation and the Bank in 2010. He is President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical consulting services company. Mr. Maness is currently serving as a director for the Michigan Oil & Gas Association, and he previously served on the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.

W. Joseph Manifold (age 60) has been a director of the Corporation since 2003 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. Manifold is the CFO of Federal Broach Holdings LLC, a holding company which operates several manufacturing companies. Previously, he was a senior manager with Ernst & Young Certified Public Accounting firm working principally on external bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield Company. Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Manifold also served on the Isabella Community Credit Union Board and was Chairman of the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.

Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2013

James C. Fabiano (age 68) has been a director of the Bank since 1979 and of the Corporation since 1988. He served as the Corporation’s chair from 2004 to 2010. Mr. Fabiano is Chairman and CEO of Fabiano Brothers, Inc., a beverage distributor operating in several counties throughout Michigan. Mr. Fabiano is a past recipient of the Mt. Pleasant Area Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the Year award. He is also a past Chairman of the Central Michigan University Board of Trustees.

Thomas L. Kleinhardt (age 57) has been a director of the Bank since October 1998 and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. Mr. Kleinhardt is President of McGuire Chevrolet, is active in the Clare Kiwanis Club, and coaches the girls Varsity Basketball team at Farwell High School.

Joseph LaFramboise (age 62)63) has been a director of the Bank since September 2007, and was appointed to the Corporation’s Board of Directors effective January 1, 2010. He is a retired Sales and Marketing Executive of Ford Motor Company. Mr. LaFramboise is an Ambassador of Eagle Village in Evart, Michigan.

Dale D. WeburgWilson C. Lauer (age 68)63) was appointed to the Board on July 1, 2012. Mr. Lauer has served as a director for the Isabella Bank-Breckenridge Division Board since 1997 and owns Lauer Farms LLC, a 2,500 acre cash crop business. Mr. Lauer has served several different community organizations including the Ithaca School District Board, the Gratiot Economic Development Board, and Farm Bureau’s County and State Policy Development Committees.

Sarah R. Opperman (age 53) was appointed to the Board on July 1, 2012. Ms. Opperman is the owner of Opperman Consulting, LLC, which provides public affairs counsel for corporate clients. She was previously employed for 28 years by The Dow Chemical Company, where she held leadership roles in public and government affairs. She was inducted into the CMU Journalism Hall of Fame and is a recipient of the Breckenridge DivisionDow Genesis Award for Excellence in People Development. Ms. Opperman serves on the CMU Board of Trustees, the CMU Research Corporation Board of Directors, and the MidMichigan Health Corporate Board of Directors.

Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2014

Dennis P. Angner (age 57) has been a director of the Corporation and the Bank since 2000. Mr. Angner has been principally employed by the Consolidated Corporation since 1984 and has served as President of the Corporation since December 30, 2001 and CFO since January 1, 2010. Mr. Angner served as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation from December 30, 2001 through December 31, 2009. He is a past Chair of the Michigan Bankers Association and is currently serving as vice chairman of its taxation committee, is a member of the American Bankers Association Government Relations Council, and served on the Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.

Dr. Jeffrey J. Barnes (age 50) has been a director of the Bank since 19872007 and of the Corporation since 2010. Dr. Barnes is a physician and shareholder in Lansing Ophthalmology PC. He is a former member of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors.

G. Charles Hubscher (age 59) has been a director of the Bank since 2004 and of the Corporation since 2010. Mr. Hubscher is President of Hubscher and Son, Inc., a sand and gravel producer. He is a director of the National Stone and Gravel Association, the Michigan Aggregates Association, serves on the Board of Trustees for the Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation, and is a member of the Zoning Board of Appeals for Deerfield Township.

David J. Maness (age 59) has been a director of the Bank since 2003 and of the Corporation since 2004. Mr. Maness has served as chairman of the board for the Corporation and the Bank since 2010. He is President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical consulting services company. Mr. Maness is currently serving as a director for the Michigan Oil & Gas Association, and he previously served on the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.

W. Joseph Manifold (age 61) has been a director of the Corporation since 2003 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. Manifold is CFO of Federal Broach Holdings LLC, a holding company which operates several manufacturing companies. Previously, he was a senior manager with Ernst & Young Certified Public Accounting firm working principally on external bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield Company. Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Manifold served on the Isabella Community Credit Union Board and was Chairman of the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.

Current Directors with Terms Ending in 2015

Richard J. Barz (age 64) has been a director of the Bank since 2000 and of the Corporation since 2000.2002. Mr. WeburgBarz has been employed by the Consolidated Corporation since 1972 and has been Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since 2010 and President and CEO of the Bank from 2001 to July 2012. Mr. Barz has been very active in community organizations and events. He is Presidenta past chairman of Weburg Farms, a cash crop farm operation. Mr. Weburg also serves as a trustee of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, is the current chairman of Gratiotthe Middle Michigan Development Corporation Board of Directors, and serves on several boards and committees for Central Michigan University and various volunteer organizations throughout mid-Michigan.

Sandra L. Caul(age 69) has been a director of the Bank since 1994 and of the Corporation since 2005. Ms. Caul is Vice Chairperson of the Central Michigan Community Hospital Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Mid Michigan Community College Advisory Board, a board member for Central Michigan Community Mental Health System.Facilities, a member of the Central Michigan Health Advisory Board for Central Michigan University and Chairperson for the Central Michigan University College of Medicine regional division fund raising effort. She also sits on the board of the Central Michigan American Red Cross. Ms. Caul retired in January 2005 as a state representative of the Michigan State House of Representatives. Ms. Caul is a registered nurse.

W. Michael McGuire (age 63) has been a director of the Corporation since 2007 and of the Bank since January 1, 2010. Mr. McGuire is currently an attorney and the Director of the Office of the Corporate Secretary and Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a manufacturer of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products, headquartered in Midland, Michigan.

Each of the directors has been engaged in their stated professions for more than five years.

Other Named Executive Officers

Steven D. Pung (age 62)63), Executive Vice President of the Bank and a member of the Board of Directors of Financial Group Information Services (a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation) has been employed by the CorporationBank since 1978. Timothy M. Miller (age 60)61), President of the Breckenridge Division of the Bank and a member of its Board of Directors, has been an employee of the CorporationBank since 1985. David J. Reetz (age 51)52), Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of the Bank, has been employed by the CorporationBank since 1987.

All officers of the Corporation serve at the pleasure of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.Board.

Corporate Governance

Director Independence

The Corporation hasWe have adopted the director independence standards as defined under Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ MarketplaceStock Market Rules. The Board hasWe have determined that Jeffrey J. Barnes, Sandra L. Caul, James C. Fabiano, G. Charles Hubscher, Thomas L. Kleinhardt, Joseph LaFramboise, Wilson C Lauer, David J. Maness, W. Joseph

Manifold, W. Michael McGuire, and Dale D. WeburgSarah R. Opperman are independent directors. Former directors James C. Fabiano and Dale D. Weburg, who retired from the Board on December 19, 2012, were also determined to be independent directors. Richard J. Barz is not independent as he is employed as Chief Executive OfficerCEO of the Corporation.Dennis P. Angner is not independent as he is employed as President and Chief Financial OfficerCFO of the Corporation.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

The Corporation’sOur Governance policy provides that only directors who are deemed to be independent as set forth by NASDAQ and SEC rules are eligible to hold the office of Chairman of the Board.chairperson. Additionally, the chairpersons of Board established committees must also be independent directors. It is the Board’sour belief that having a separate Chairmanchairperson and Chief Executive OfficerCEO best serves the interest of the shareholders. The Board of Directors elects its chairperson at the first Board meeting following the annual meeting. Independent members of the Board of Directors meet without insiderinside directors at least twice per year.

Management is responsible for the Corporation’s day to dayour day-to-day risk management and the Board’s role is to engage in informed oversight. The Board utilizes committees to oversee risks associated with compensation financial, and governance. Financial Group Information Services, the Corporation’sour information processing subsidiary, is responsible for overseeing risks associated with information technology. The Isabella Bank Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing credit, investment, interest rate, and trust risks. The chairpersons of the respective boards or committees report on their activities on a regular basis.

TheOur Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the integrity of theour consolidated financial statements, of the Corporation; the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence;independence, the performance of the Corporation’s, and its subsidiaries’,our internal audit function and those of independent auditors; the Corporation’sauditors, our system of internal controls; the Corporation’scontrols, our financial reporting and system of disclosure controls;controls, and theour compliance by the Corporation with legal and regulatory requirements and with the Corporation’sour Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Committees of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance

The Board met 12 times during 2011.2012. All incumbent directors attended 75% or more of the meetings held in 2011.2012. The Board has an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and a Compensation and Human Resource Committee.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors who meet the requirements for independence as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.directors. Information regarding the functions performed by the Committee, its membership, and the number of meetings held during the year, is set forth in the “Report of the Audit Committee” included elsewhere in this annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board. The Audit Committee CharterBoard, which is available on the Bank’s websitewebsite:www.isabellabank.com under the Investor Relations tab..

In accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes  —  Oxley Act of 2002, directors Manifold and McGuire meet the requirements of Audit Committee Financial Expert and have been so designated by the Board.designated. The Committee also consists of directors Barnes, Hubscher, LaFramboise, and Maness.Maness (ex-officio).

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Corporation hasWe have a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consisting of independent directors who meet the requirements for independence as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.directors. The Committee consists of directors LaFramboise, Maness (ex-officio), Manifold, and McGuire. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held two meetingsone meeting in 2011,2012, with all directors attendedattending the meetings.

meeting. The Board has approved a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter which is available on the Bank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the Investor Relations tab..

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for evaluating and recommending individuals for nomination to the Board for approval. The Committee in evaluating nominees, including incumbent directors and any nominees put forth by shareholders, considers business experience, skills, character, judgment, leadership experience, and their knowledge of the geographical markets, business segments or other criteria the Committee deems relevant and appropriate based on the current composition of the Board. The Committee considers diversity in identifying members with respect to our geographical markets served by the Corporation and the business experience of the nominee.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider, as potential nominees persons recommended by shareholders. Recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858 and include the shareholder’s name, address and number of shares of the Corporation owned by the shareholder. The recommendation should also include the name, age, address and qualifications of the recommended candidate for nomination.candidate. Recommendations for the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders should be delivered no later than December 6, 2012.12, 2013. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not evaluateevaluates all potential director nominees for director differently based onin the same manner, whether theythe nominations are recommended to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, byreceived from a shareholder, or otherwise.

Compensation and Human Resource Committee

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Corporation’sour Board the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, of the Corporation, benefit plans and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The committee consists of independent directors who meet the requirements for independence as defined in Rule 5605(a) (2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Committee consists of directors Maness, Barnes, Caul, Fabiano, Hubscher, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Lauer, Manifold, McGuire, and Weburg.Opperman. The Committeecommittee held two meetings during 20112012 with all directors in attendance with the exception of Fabiano who was excused from one of the meetings.attendance. This Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the Board that is available on the Bank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the Investor Relations tab..

Communications with the Board

Shareholders may communicate with the Corporation’s Board of Directors by sending written communications to the attention of the Corporation’s Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858. Communications will be forwarded to the Board or the appropriate committee, as soon as practicable.

Code of Ethics

The Corporation has adopted aOur Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, thatwhich is applicable to the Corporation’s Chief Executive OfficerCEO and the Chief Financial Officer. The Corporation’s Code of Business Conduct and EthicsCFO, is available on the Bank’s websitewww.isabellabank.com under the Investor Relations tab..

Report of the Audit Committee

The Audit Committee oversees the Corporation’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. The 20112012 Committee consisted of directors Barnes, Hubscher, LaFramboise, Maness, Manifold, and McGuire.

The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all auditing services and permitted non-audit services for the Corporation by itsour independent auditors, or any other auditing or accounting firm, if those fees are reasonably expected to exceed 5.0% of the current year agreed upon fee for independent audit services, except as noted below. The Audit Committee has established general guidelines for the permissible scope and nature of any permitted non-audit services in connection with its annual review of the audit plan and reviews the guidelines with the Board of Directors.

Management has the primary responsibility for the consolidated financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also reviewed with management and the independent auditors, management’s assertion on the design and effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.2012.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the Corporation’sour independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Corporation’sour accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), including those described in AU Section 380 “Communication with Audit Committees”, as may be modified or supplemented. In addition, the Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent accountantsauditors required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, as may be modified or supplemented, and has discussed with the independent accountantauditor the independent accountants’auditors’ independence.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Corporation’sour internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal and external independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Corporation’sour internal controls, and the overall quality of the Corporation’sour financial reporting process. The Audit Committee held sixfive meetings during 2011,2012, and all committee members attended 75% or more of the meetings.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112012 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC as the independent auditors for the 20122013 audit.

Respectfully submitted,

W. Joseph Manifold, Audit Committee Chairperson

Jeffrey J. Barnes

G. Charles Hubscher

Joseph LaFramboise

David J. Maness

W. Michael McGuire

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for reviewing and recommending the compensation and benefits for the Chief Executive Officer,CEO, President and CFO, and executive officers of the Corporation.officers. The Committee evaluates and approves theour executive officer and senior management compensation plans, policies, and programs of the Corporation and its affiliates.programs. The Chief Executive Officer,CEO, Richard J. Barz, conducts annual performance reviews for Named Executive Officers, excluding himself. Mr. Barz recommends an appropriate salary to the Committee based on the performance review and the officer’s years of service along with competitive market data.

Compensation Objectives

The Committee considers asset growth with the safety and soundness objectives and earnings per share to be the primary ratios in measuring financial performance. The Corporation’sOur philosophy is to maximize long-term return to shareholders consistent with safe and sound banking practices, while maintaining the commitment to superior customer and community service. The Corporation believesWe believe that the performance of executive officers in managing the business should be the basis for determining overall compensation. Consideration is also given to overall economic conditions and current competitive forces in the market place. The objectives of the Committee are to effectively balance salaries and potential compensation to an officer’s individual management responsibilities and encourage each of them to realize their potential for future contributions to the Corporation.contributions. The objectives are designed to attract and retain high performing executive officers who will lead the Corporationprovide leadership while attaining the Corporation’s earnings and performance goals.

What the Compensation Programs are Designed to Reward

The Corporation’sOur compensation programs are designed to reward dedicated and conscientious employment, with the Corporation, loyalty in terms of continued employment, attainment of job related goals and overall profitability of the Corporation.profitability. In measuring an executive officer’s contributions, to the Corporation, the Committee considers numerous factors including, among other things, the Corporation’sour growth in terms of asset size and increase in earnings per share. In rewarding loyalty and long-term service, the Corporation provideswe provide attractive retirement benefits.

Review of Risks Associated with Compensation Plans

Based on an analysis conducted by management and reviewed by the Committee, management doeswe do not believe that the Corporation’s compensation programs for employees are reasonably likely to have a material short or long term adverse effect on the Corporation’s Results of Operation.our operating results.

Use of Consultants

In 2010,2012, the Committee directly engaged the services of Blanchard Chase (now Blanchard Consulting Group),Group, an outsideindependent compensation consulting firm, to assist with a total compensation review for the top twothree executive officers of the Consolidated Corporation (CEO, President and CFO, and Bank President). Blanchard Consulting Group is an independent consulting firm and does not perform any additional services for the Corporationus or any members of senior management. In addition, Blanchard Consulting Group does not have any other personal or business relationships with any Board membermembers or any officer of the Corporation.officers. During 2011, the Committee did not employ any services of outside compensation or benefit consultants to assist it in compensation-related initiatives.

Elements of Compensation

The Corporation’sOur executive compensation program has consisted primarily of base salary and benefits, annual cash bonusperformance incentives, director fees for insider directors,benefits and perquisites, and participation in the Corporation’sour retirement plans.

Why Each of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen

Base Salary and Benefitsare set to provide competitive levels of compensation to attract and retain officers with strong motivated leadership. Each officer’s performance, current compensation, and responsibilities within the Corporation are considered by the Committee when establishing base salaries. The Corporation also believes

it is best to pay sufficient base salary because it believes an over-reliance on equity incentive compensation could potentially skew incentives toward short-term maximization of shareholder value as opposed to building long-term shareholder value. Base salary encourages management to operate the Corporation in a safe and sound manner even when incentive goals may prove unattainable.

Annual Performance Incentives are used to reward executive officers for the Corporation’s overall financial performance. This element of the Corporation’s compensation programs is included in the overall compensation in order to reward employees above and beyond their base salaries when the Corporation’s performance and profitability exceed established annual targets. The inclusion of a modest incentive compensation encourages management to be more creative, diligent and exhaustive in managing the Corporation to achieve specific financial goals without incurring inordinate risks.

Performance incentives paid under the Executive Incentive Plan in 2011 were determined by reference to seven performance measures that related to services performed in 2010. The maximum award that may be granted under the Executive Incentive Plan to each eligible employee equals 10% of the employee’s base salary (the “Maximum Award”). The payment of 35% of the Maximum Award was conditioned on the eligible employee accomplishing personal performance goals that were established by such employee’s supervisor as part of the employee’s annual performance review. Each of the employees who were eligible to participate in the Executive Incentive Plan in 2010 accomplished his or her personal performance goals and was accordingly paid 35% of the 2010 Maximum Award in 2011. The payment of the remaining 65% of the Maximum Award was conditioned on the achievement of Corporation-wide targets in the following six categories: (1) earnings per share (weighted 40%); (2) net operating expenses to average assets (weighted 10%); (3) Fully Taxable Equivalent “FTE” net interest margin, excluding loan fees (weighted 10%); (4) in-market deposit growth (weighted 20%); (5) loan growth (weighted 10%); and (6) exceeding peer group return on average assets (weighted 10%). The following chart provides the 2010 target for each of the foregoing targets that were used to determine bonus awards that were paid in 2011, as well as the performance obtained for each target.

Executive Incentive Plan

    2010 Targets  2010
Performance
 

Target

  25.00%  50.00%  75.00%  100.00%  

Earning per share

  $  1.15   $  1.16   $  1.18   $  1.20    $1.31  

Net operating expenses to average assets

   1.71  1.70  1.69  1.68  1.65

FTE Net Interest Margin

   3.88  3.90  3.92  3.94  3.83

In market deposit growth

   4.50  5.00  5.50  6.00  12.19

Loan growth

   5.50  6.00  6.50  7.00  3.03

Exceeding peer group return on average assets

   0.26  0.26  0.27  0.28  0.77

Retirement Plans.    The Corporation’s retirement plans are designed to assist executives in providing themselves with a financially secure retirement. The retirement plans include: a frozen defined benefit pension plan; a 401(k) plan; and a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), which is frozen to new participants; and a retirement bonus plan.

How the Corporation Determined Amounts for Each Element

The Committee’s approach to determining the annual base salary of executive officers is to offer competitive salaries in comparison with other comparable financial institutions. The Committee utilizes both an independent compensation consultant, Blanchard Consulting Group, and a survey prepared by the Michigan Bankers Association of similar sized Michigan based financial institutions. The independent compensation consultant established a benchmark peer group of 20 mid-west financial institutions in non urban areas whose average assets size, number of branch locations, return on average assets and nonperforming assets were comparable to Isabella Bank Corporation. The Michigan Bankers Association 2011 compensation survey was based on the compensation information provided by these organizations for 2010. Specific factors used to decide

where an executive officer’s salary should be within the established range include the historical financial performance, financial performance outlook, years of service, and job performance. The Committee targets total compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and the President & Chief Financial Officer to approximate the median of the range obtained from the Michigan Bankers Association compensation survey as well as any ranges obtained from independent compensation consultants. Compensation for other named executive officers was based on the ranges provided by the Michigan Bankers Association survey.

The annual performance incentive is based on the achievement of goals set for each individual. An analysis is conducted by the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer makes a recommendation to the Committee for the appropriate amount for each individual executive officer. The Committee reviews, modifies if necessary, and approves the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee reviews the performance of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee uses the following factors as quantitative measures of corporate performance in determining annual cash bonus amounts to be paid:

Peer group financial performance compensation

1 and 5 year shareholder returns

Earnings per share and earnings per share growth

Budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performance

Community and industry involvement

Results of audit and regulatory exams

Other strategic goals as established by the board of directors

While no particular weight is given to any specific factor, the Committee gives at least equal weight to the subjective analyses as described above.

Retirement plans.    The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan noted below, the Corporation increased the contributions to the 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007. The Corporation makes an annual 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment and are 100% vested after 6 years through a laddered vesting schedule of service for matching contributions.

The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) which was frozen effective December 31, 2006 to new participants. Contributions to the plan are discretionary and approved by the Board of Directors.

The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. An initial amount was credited for each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts have been credited on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan. The amount of the initial allocation and the annual allocation are determined pursuant to the payment schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board of Directors, as set forth in the plan.

In December 2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment was recognized in the first quarter of 2007 and the current participants’ accrued benefits were frozen as of March 1, 2007. Participation in the plan was limited to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006.

Other Benefits and Perquisites.Executive officers are eligible for all of the benefits made available to full-time employees of the Corporation (such as the 401(k) plan, employee stock purchase plan, health insurance, group term life insurance and disability insurance) on the same basis as other full-time employees and are subject to the same sick leave and other employee policies. The Corporation also provides its executive officers with

certain additional benefits and perquisites, which it believes are appropriate in order to attract and retain the proper quality of talent for these positions and to recognize that similar executive benefits and perquisites are commonly offered by comparable financial institutions.

A description and the cost to the Corporation of these perquisites are included in footnote two in the “Summary Compensation Table” appearing on page 15.

The Corporation believes that benefits and perquisites provided to its executive officers in 2011 represented a reasonable percentage of each executive’s total compensation package and was not inconsistent, in the aggregate, with perquisites provided to executive officers of comparable competing financial institutions.

The Corporation maintains a plan for qualified officers to provide death benefits to each participant. Insurance policies, designed primarily to fund death benefits, have been purchased on the life of each participant with the Corporation as the sole owner and beneficiary of the policies.

How Elements Fit into Overall Compensation Objectives

TheIndividual elements of the Corporation’sour compensation objectives are structured to reward past and currentstrong financial performance, continued service, and to motivate itsincentivize our leaders to excel in the future. The Corporation’s salaryWe continually review our compensation has generally been usedobjectives to retain and attract motivated leadership. The Corporation intends to continually ensure salariesthat they are sufficient to attract and retain exceptional officers.

Why Each of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen and How We Determine Amounts for Each Element

Base Salaries, which include director fees for certain executive officers, are set to provide competitive levels of compensation to attract and retain officers with strong leadership skills. Each officer’s performance, current compensation, and responsibilities are considered by the Committee when establishing base salaries. We also believe it is best to pay sufficient base salary because we believe an over-reliance on equity incentive compensation could potentially skew incentives toward short-term maximization of shareholder value as opposed to building long-term shareholder value. Competitive base salary encourages management to operate in a safe and sound manner even when incentive goals may prove unattainable.

The Corporation’sCommittee’s approach to determining the annual base salary of executive officers is to offer competitive salaries in comparison with other comparable financial institutions. The Committee utilized both an independent compensation consultant, Blanchard Consulting Group, and a survey prepared by the Michigan Bankers Association of similar sized Michigan based financial institutions. The independent compensation consultant established a benchmark peer group of 15 mid-west financial institutions in non-urban areas with comparable average assets size ($900 million—$2 billion), number of branch locations, return on average assets (year-ended 2011 ROAA of .38% or greater), and nonperforming assets. The Michigan Bankers Association 2012 compensation survey was based on the compensation information provided by these organizations for 2011. Specific factors used to decide where an executive officer’s salary should be within the established range include the historical financial performance, financial performance outlook, years of service, and job performance. The Committee targeted total compensation for the CEO, the President & CFO, and Bank President to approximate the median of the range obtained from the Michigan Bankers Association compensation survey as well as any ranges obtained from the independent compensation consultant. Compensation for other named executive officers was based on the ranges provided by the Michigan Bankers Association survey.

Annual Performance Incentives are used to reward executive officers based on our overall financial performance. This element of the compensation program is included in the overall compensation in order to reward employees above and beyond their base salaries when our performance and profitability exceed established annual targets. The inclusion of this modest incentive encourages management to be creative and diligent in managing to achieve specific financial goals without incurring inordinate risks. Annual performance incentives paid in 2012 were determined by reference to seven performance measures that related to services performed in 2011. The maximum award that may be granted to each eligible employee equals 10% of the employee’s base salary (the “Maximum Award”).

The payment of 35% of the Maximum Award (“personal performance goals”) is based on the achievement of goals set for each individual. An analysis is conducted by the CEO. The CEO makes a recommendation to the Committee for the appropriate amount for each individual executive officer. The Committee reviews, modifies if necessary, and approves the recommendations of the CEO. The Committee reviews the performance of the CEO. The Committee uses the following factors as quantitative measures of corporate performance in determining annual cash bonus incentive rewards currentamounts to be paid:

Peer group financial performance based uponcompensation

1 and 5 year shareholder returns

Earnings per share and earnings per share growth

Budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performance

Community and industry involvement

Results of audit and regulatory exams

Other strategic goals as established by the Board

Each of the executive officers who were eligible to participate in 2011 accomplished their personal and corporateperformance goals and targets. were accordingly paid 35% of the 2011 Maximum Award in 2012.

The Corporation offerspayment of the Isabella Bank Corporationremaining 65% of the Maximum Award (“corporate performance goals”) was conditioned on the achievement of targets in the following six categories:

(1)Earnings per share (weighted 40%).

(2)Net operating expenses to average assets (weighted 15%).

(3)Fully Taxable Equivalent (“FTE”) net interest margin, excluding loan fees (weighted 10%).

(4)In-market deposit growth (weighted 10%).

(5)Loan growth (weighted 15%).

(6)Exceeding peer group return on average assets (weighted 10%).

The following chart provides the 2011 target for each corporate performance goal, as well as the performance attained for each target.

    2011 Targets  2011
Performance
  Target %
Obtained
 

Target

  25.00%  50.00%  75.00%  100.00%   

Earning per share

  $  1.31   $  1.33   $  1.35   $  1.37    $  1.39    100

Net operating expenses to average assets

   1.69  1.68  1.67  1.64  1.61  100

FTE Net Interest Margin

   3.72  3.74  3.76  3.78  3.68  0

In market deposit growth

   4.50  5.00  5.50  6.00  7.12  100

Loan growth

   3.00  3.50  4.00  4.50  0.78  0

Exceeding peer group return on average assets

   1.01  1.04  1.06  1.09  0.98  0

Benefits and Related Companies Deferred Compensation PlanPerquisites.    Executive officers are eligible for Directors (the “Directors’ Plan”) to motivate its eligible officers to enhance value for shareholders by aligning the interests of management with those of its shareholders.

As part of its goal of attracting and retaining quality team members, the Corporation has developed competitive employee benefit plans. Management feels that the combination of all of the plans listed above makesbenefits made available to full-time employees (such as health insurance, group term life insurance and disability insurance) on the Corporation’ssame basis as other full-time employees and are subject to the same sick leave and other employee policies.

We also provide our executive officers with certain additional perquisites, which we believe are appropriate in order to attract and retain the proper quality of talent for these positions and to recognize that similar executive perquisites are commonly offered by comparable financial institutions. We maintain a plan for qualified officers to provide death benefits to each participant. Insurance policies, designed primarily to fund death benefits, have been purchased on the life of each participant with the Bank as the sole owner and beneficiary of the policies. We believe that perquisites provided to our executive officers in 2012 represented a reasonable percentage of each executive’s total compensation packages attractive.package and are consistent, in the aggregate, with perquisites provided to executive officers of comparable financial institutions. A description and the cost of these perquisites are included in footnotes 2 and 3 in the “Summary Compensation Table” appearing on page 12.

Retirement Plans.    Our retirement plans are designed to assist executives in providing themselves with a financially secure retirement. The retirement plans include a 401(k) plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan, a frozen non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), and a retirement bonus plan.

We have a 401(k) plan, in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. We provide an annual 3.0% of compensation safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment and are 100% vested after 6 years through a laddered vesting schedule of service for matching contributions.

Our defined benefit pension plan was curtailed effective March 1, 2007 and the current participants’ accrued benefits were frozen as of that date. Participation in the plan was limited to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006.

Our non-leveraged ESOP was frozen effective December 31, 2006 to new participants. Contributions to the plan are discretionary and approved by the Board.

The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. Benefit amounts are determined pursuant to the payment schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the Board.

Compensation and Human Resource Committee Report

The following Report of the Compensation and Human Resource Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Corporation filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Corporation specifically incorporates this Report by reference therein.

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee, which includes all of the independent directors of the Board, has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of SEC Regulation S-K with management, and based on such review and discussion, the Compensation and Human Resource Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Submitted by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of Isabella Bank Corporation’s Board of Directors:the Board:

David J. Maness, Chairperson

Jeffrey J. Barnes

Sandra L. Caul

James C. Fabiano

G. Charles Hubscher

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

Joseph LaFramboise

Wilson C. Lauer

W. Joseph Manifold

W. Michael McGuire

Dale D. WeburgSarah R. Opperman

Executive Officers

Executive Officers of the Corporationofficers are compensated in accordance with their employment with the applicable entity. The following table shows information on compensation earned from the Corporation or its subsidiaries forin each of the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2011,2012, for the Chief Executive Officer,CEO, the Chief Financial Officer,CFO, and the Corporation’sour three other most highly compensated executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and principal position

  Year   Salary
($)(1)
   Bonus ($)   Change in pension
value and
non-qualified
deferred
compensation
earnings

($)(2)
   All other
compensation
($)(3)
   Total
($)
   Year   Salary
($)(1)
   Bonus ($)   Change in pension
value and
non-qualified
deferred
compensation
earnings
($)(2)
   All other
compensation
($)(3)
   Total ($) 

Richard J. Barz

   2011    $375,225    $26,535    $181,143    $37,627    $620,530     2012    $396,325    $25,106    $123,578    $35,615    $580,624  

CEO Isabella Bank Corporation

   2010     357,600     24,706     116,364     34,856     533,526  

President and CEO Isabella Bank

   2009     354,250     9,625     90,184     30,568     484,627  

CEO

   2011     375,225     26,535     181,143     37,627     620,530  

Isabella Bank Corporation

   2010     357,600     24,706     116,364     34,856     533,526  

Dennis P. Angner

   2011    $355,625    $26,100    $163,672    $28,542    $573,939     2012    $357,335    $23,628    $131,266    $28,208    $540,437  

President and CFO

   2010     352,600     24,706     103,340     27,922     508,568     2011     355,625     26,100     163,672     28,542     573,939  

Isabella Bank Corporation

   2009     359,425     9,800     79,623     25,252     474,100     2010     352,600     24,706     103,340     27,922     508,568  

Steven D. Pung

   2011    $167,362    $12,719    $98,915    $27,732    $306,728     2012    $195,128    $13,333    $67,361    $30,111    $305,933  

Executive Vice President

   2010     143,632     10,572     62,288     32,886     249,378  

President

   2011     167,362     12,719     98,915     27,732     249,378  

Isabella Bank

   2009     127,100     6,003     48,518     18,468     200,089     2010     143,632     10,572     62,288     32,886     249,378  

Timothy M. Miller

   2011    $181,986    $13,046    $17,000    $15,070    $227,102     2012    $186,459    $11,804    $10,000    $16,676    $224,939  

President of the Breckenridge

   2010     179,309     12,370     9,000     14,709     215,388     2011     181,986     13,046     17,000     15,070     227,102  

Division of Isabella Bank

   2009     180,238     7,319     6,000     11,685     205,242     2010     179,309     12,370     9,000     14,709     215,388  

David J. Reetz(4)

   2011    $125,640    $8,612    $61,944    $15,077    $211,273     2012    $129,397    $9,708    $45,361    $17,138    $201,604  

Sr. Vice President and CLO

   2010     123,910     9,165     36,429     13,694     183,198     2011     125,640     8,612     61,944     15,077     211,273  

Isabella Bank

               2010     123,910     9,165     36,429     13,694     183,198  

 

 

(1)Includes compensation voluntarily deferred under the Corporation’sour 401(k) plan. Directors fees are also included, for calendar years 2012, 2011 2010 and 20092010 respectively as follows: Richard J. Barz $51,325, $50,225, $52,600, and $59,250;$52,600; Dennis P. Angner $51,325, $49,625, $52,600, and $59,425;$52,600; Steven D. Pung $900, $900, and $900; and Timothy M. Miller $10,400, $10,650, $11,300, and $26,900.$11,300.

 

(2)Represents the aggregate non-cash change in the actuarial present value of the noted executive’s accumulated benefit under the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan for calendar years 2012, 2011, 2010, and 20092010 as follows: Richard J. Barz $83,000, $143,000, $81,000, and $56,000;$81,000; Dennis P. Angner $64,000, $109,000, $53,000, and $32,000;$53,000; Steven D. Pung $44,000, $77,000, $42,000, $29,000;and $42,000; Timothy M. Miller $10,000, $17,000, $9,000, and $6,000;$9,000; David J. Reetz $25,000, $43,000 and $19,000; this also includes the non-cash change in the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan for calendar years 2012, 2011, 2010, and 20092010 as follows: Richard J. Barz $40,578, $38,143, $35,364, $34,184;and $35,364; Dennis P. Angner $67,266, $54,672, $50,340, and $47,623;$50,340; Steven D. Pung $23,361, $21,915, $20,288, and $19,518;$20,288; and David J. Reetz $20,361, $18,944 and $17,429.

 

(3)For all notednamed executives all other compensation includes 401(k) matching contributions. For Richard J. Barz, Steven D. Pung, and David J. Reetz this also includes club dues and auto allowance. For Dennis P. Angner and Timothy M. Miller, this also includes auto allowance.

(4)Not a named executive officer prior to 2010.

20112012 Pension Benefits

The following table indicates the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20112012 for each named executive in the summary compensation table.

 

Name

  

Plan name

  Number of
years of
vesting
service as of
01/01/12 (#)
  Present
value of
accumulated
benefit

($)
   Payments
during last
fiscal year
   

Plan name

  Number of
years of
vesting
service as of
01/01/12 (#)
  Present
value of
accumulated
benefit
($)
   Payments
during last
fiscal year
 

Richard J. Barz

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  40  $905,000    $    Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  41  $988,000    $  
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  40   309,074         Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  41   349,652       

Dennis P. Angner

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  28   491,000         Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  29   555,000       
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  28   330,205         Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  29   397,471       

Steven D. Pung

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  33   461,000         Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  34   505,000       
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  33   167,545         Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  34   190,906       

Timothy M.
Miller

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  11   96,000         Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  12   106,000       

David J. Reetz

  Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  25   162,000         Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan  26   187,000       
  Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  25   109,322         Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan  26   129,683       

Defined benefit pension plan.    The Corporation sponsorsWe sponsor the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan, a frozen defined benefit pension plan. In December 2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit planThe curtailment, which was effective March 1, 2007. The curtailment2007, froze the current participant’s accrued benefits as of March 1, 2007that date and limited participation in the plan to eligible employees as of December 31, 2006. Due to the curtailment of the plan, the number of years of credited service was frozen. As such, the years of credited service for the plan may differ from the participant’s actual years of service with the Corporation.service.

Annual contributions are made to the plan as required by accepted actuarial principles, applicable federal tax laws, and to pay expenses ofrelated to operating and maintaining the plan. The amount of contributions on behalf of any one participant cannot be separately or individually computed.

Pension plan benefits are based on years of service and the employees’ five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service, effective through December 31, 2006.

A participant may earn a benefit for up to 35 years of accredited service. Earned benefits are 100 percent100% vested after five years of service. Benefit payments normally start when a participant reaches age 65. A participant with more than five years of service may elect to take early retirement benefits anytime after reaching age 55. Benefits payable under early retirement are reduced actuarially for each month prior to age 65 in which benefits begin.

Dennis P. Angner, Richard J. Barz, Steven D. Pung, and Timothy M. Miller are eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan.plan. Under the provisions of the Plan,plan, participants are eligible for early retirement after reaching the age of 55 with at least 5 years of service. The early retirement benefit amount is the accrued benefit payable at normal retirement date reduced by 5/9% for each of the first 60 months and 5/18% for each of the next 60 months that the benefit commencement date precedes the normal retirement date.

Retirement bonus plan.    The Corporation sponsorsWe sponsor the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan. The Retirement Bonus Plan is aThis nonqualified plan of deferred compensation benefits for eligible employees effective January 1, 2007. This plan is intended to provide eligible employees with additional retirement benefits. To be eligible, the employee needed to be employed by the Corporationan employee on January 1, 2007, and be a participant in the Corporation’sour frozen Executive Supplemental Income Agreement. Participants must also be an officer of the Corporation with at least 10 years of service as of December 31, 2006. The Corporation hasWe have sole and exclusive discretion to add new participants to the plan by authorizing such participation pursuant to action of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.Board.

An initial amount was credited for each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts have been credited on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the Plan.plan. The amount of the initial allocation and the annual allocation shall be determined pursuant to the payment schedule adopted by theat our sole and exclusive discretion, of the Board, as set forth in the Plan.plan.

Richard J. Barz, Dennis P. Angner, and Steven D. Pung are eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan.plan. Under the provisions of the plan, participants are eligible for early retirement upon attaining 55 years of age. There is no difference between the calculation of benefits payable upon early retirement and normal retirement.

20112012 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Executive
contributions in
last FY

($)
   Aggregate
earnings in
last FY ($)
   Aggregate
balance at
last FYE
($)
   Executive
contributions in
last FY
($)
   Aggregate
earnings in
last FY ($)
   Aggregate
balance at
last FYE
($)
 

Richard J. Barz

  $29,462    $5,133    $176,837    $30,012    $6,695    $195,952  

Dennis P. Angner

   33,462     6,898     235,199     38,225     8,870     259,060  

Steven D. Pung

   900     238     7,998     900     292     8,431  

Timothy M. Miller

   3,337     1,080     36,297     3,275     1,289     36,904  

David J. Reetz

   N/A     N/A     N/A     N/A     N/A     N/A  

The directors of the Corporation and its subsidiariesDirectors are required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees into the Directors’ Plan and may defer up to 100% of their earned fees based on their annual election. These amounts are reflected in the 2011 nonqualified deferred compensation table above.above table. Under the Directors’ Plan,plan, these deferred fees are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of the Corporation’sour common stock based on the fair market value of shares of the Corporation’s common stock at that time. Shares credited to a participant’s account are eligible for stock and cash dividends as payable.paid.

Distribution from the Directors’ Planplan occurs when the participant retires from the Board, attains age 70, or upon the occurrence of certain other events. Distributions must take the form of shares of the Corporation’sour common stock. Any Corporation common stock issued under the Directors’ Planplan will be considered restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

The estimated paymentsamounts payable to each named executive officer upon severance from employment, retirement, termination upon death or disability or termination following a change in control of the Corporation are described below. For all termination scenarios, the amounts assume such termination took place as of December 31, 2011.2012.

Any Severance of Employment

Regardless of the manner in which a named executive officer’s employment terminates, he or she is entitled to receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment. Such amounts include:

 

Amounts accrued and vested through the Defined Benefit Pension Plan.

 

Amounts accrued and vested through the Retirement Bonus Plan.

 

Amounts deferred in the Directors’ Plan.

 

Unused vacation pay.

Retirement

In the event of the retirement of an executive officer, the officer would receive the benefits identified above. As of December 31, 2011,2012, the named executive officers listed had no unused vacation days.

Death or Disability

In the event of death or disability of an executive officer, in addition to the benefits listed above, the executive officer will also receive payments under the Corporation’sour life insurance plan or benefits under the Corporation’sour disability plan as appropriate.

In addition to potential payments upon termination available to all employees, the estates for the executive officers listed below would receive the following payments upon death:

 

Name

  While an
Active
Employee
   Subsequent to
Retirement
   While an
Active
Employee
   Subsequent to
Retirement
 

Richard J. Barz

  $650,000    $325,000    $690,000    $345,000  

Dennis P. Angner

   612,000     306,000     612,000     306,000  

Steven D. Pung

   333,000     166,500     388,400     194,200  

Timothy M. Miller

   305,600     152,800     314,000     157,000  

David J. Reetz

   251,200     125,600     258,800     129,400  

Change in Control

The CorporationWe currently doesdo not have a change in control agreement with any of the executive officers; provided, however, pursuant to the Retirement Bonus Plan each participant would become 100% vested in their benefit under the plan if, following a change in control, they voluntarily terminate employment or are terminated without just cause.

Director Compensation

The following table summarizes the Compensation of each non-employee director who served on the Board of Directors during 2011.2012.

 

   

Fees

earned or

paid in
cash

   Total 

Name

  ($)   ($) 

Jeffrey J. Barnes

   27,675     27,675  

Sandra L. Caul

   32,675     32,675  

James C. Fabiano

   32,550     32,550  

G. Charles Hubscher

   32,375     32,375  

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

   36,675     36,675  

Joseph LaFramboise

   32,775     32,775  

David J. Maness

   58,321     58,321  

W. Joseph Manifold

   30,871     30,871  

W. Michael McGuire

   35,050     35,050  

Dianne C. Morey

   7,350     7,350  

Dale D. Weburg

   36,425     36,425  
Fees
earned or
paid in
cash

Name

($)

Jeffrey J. Barnes

27,825

Sandra L. Caul

34,225

James C. Fabiano

35,525

G. Charles Hubscher

32,925

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

38,425

Joseph LaFramboise

34,425

Wilson C. Lauer

20,975

David J. Maness

57,925

W. Joseph Manifold

30,025

W. Michael McGuire

37,625

Sarah R. Opperman

14,325

Dale D. Weburg

37,325

The CorporationWe paid $1,350 per board meeting plus a retainer of $6,000 to each board member during 2011.2012. Members of the Audit Committee were paid $500 per audit committee meeting attended. Members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee were paid $200 per meeting attended. The Chairchairperson of the Board is paid a retainer of $33,000$39,000 and the Chairchairperson for the Audit Committee is paid a retainer of $4,000. Fees paid to Dianne C. Morey during 2011 were significantly less than the other directors due to her resignation from the Corporation’s Board of Directors on April 27, 2011.

Pursuant to the Directors’ Plan, the directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees.fees into the plan. Under the Directors’ Plan, deferred directors’ fees are converted on a quarterly basis into shares of the Corporation’sour common stock, based on the fair market value of a share of the Corporation’sour common stock at that time. Shares of stock credited to a participant’s account are eligible for cash and stock dividends as payable.paid. Directors of the Corporation deferred $444,905$458,893 under the Directors’ Plan in 2011.2012.

Upon a participant’s attainment of age 70, retirement from the Board, or the occurrence of certain other events, the participant isthey are eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind distribution of all of the stock that is then credited to his or hertheir account. The plan does not allow for cash settlement. Stock issued under the Directors’ Plan is restricted stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The CorporationWe established a Rabbi Trust (the Trust) effective as of January 1, 2008 to fund the Directors’ Plan. The Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the Corporationwe may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the Corporationwe may not reach the assets of the Trust for any purpose other than meeting its obligations under the Directors’ Plan, the assets of the Trust remain subject to the claims of the Corporation’sour creditors. The CorporationWe may contribute cash or common stock to the Trust from time to time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors’ Plan. The Trust will use any cash that the Corporationwe may contribute to purchase shares of the Corporation’sour common stock on the open market through the Corporation’sour brokerage services department.

The Corporation

We transferred $440,155$459,193 to the Trust in 2011,2012, which held 16,5855,130 shares of the Corporation’sour common stock for settlement as of December 31, 2011.2012. As of December 31, 2011,2012, there were 201,438165,436 shares of stock credited to participants’ accounts, which credits are unfunded as of such date to the extent that they are in excess of the stock and cash that has been credited to the Trust. All amounts are unsecured claims against the Corporation’sour general assets. The net cost of this benefit to the Corporation was $183,703$170,688 in 2011.2012.

The following table displays the cumulative number of equity shares credited to the accounts of active directors pursuant to the terms of the Directors’ Plan as of December 31, 2011:2012:

 

Name

  # of shares of
stock credited
 

Dennis PP. Angner

   9,92411,911  

Jeffrey J. Barnes

   4,5615,914  

Richard J. Barz

   7,4619,009  

Sandra L. Caul

   17,806

James C. Fabiano

47,51818,783  

G. Charles Hubscher

   7,4069,079  

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

   13,25115,358  

Joseph LaFramboise

   5,4166,476

Wilson C. Lauer

1,501  

David J. Maness

   15,85818,897  

W. Joseph Manifold

   9,66711,291  

W. Michael McGuire

   5,8456,512  

Dale D. WeburgSarah R. Opperman

   15,651619  

Compensation and Human Resource Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Corporation’s Board the compensation of the Chief Executive OfficerCEO and other executive officers, of the Corporation, benefit plans and the overall percentage increase in salaries. The committee consists of directors Maness, Barnes, Caul, Fabiano, Hubscher, Kleinhardt, LaFramboise, Lauer, Manifold, McGuire, and Weburg.Opperman.

Indebtedness of and Transactions with Management

Certain directors and officers of the Corporation and members of their families were loan customers of Isabellathe Bank, or have been directors or officers of corporations, members or managers of limited liability companies, or partners of partnerships which have had transactions with the Bank. In management’sour opinion, all such transactions were made in the ordinary course of business and were substantially on the same terms, including collateral and interest rates, as those prevailing at

the same time for comparable transactions with customers not related to the Bank. These transactions do not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Total loans to these customers were approximately $3,728,000$6,598,000 as of December 31, 2011. The Corporation addresses2012. We address transactions with related parties in itsour Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Policy.Conflicts of interest are prohibited, as a matter of Corporation policy, except under guidelinesboard approved by the Board of Directors or committees of the Board.guidelines.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

As of March 28, 2012 the Corporation does26, 2013, we do not have any person who is known to the Corporation to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of theour common stock of the Corporation.stock.

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 28, 201226, 2013 as to theour common stock of the Corporation owned beneficially by each director and director nominee, by each named executive officer, and by all directors, director nominees and executive officers of the Corporation as a group. The shares to be credited under the Directors’ Plan are not included in the table below.

 

 Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership  Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership 

Name of Owner

 Sole Voting
and  Investment
Powers
   Shared Voting
or Investment
Powers
   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percentage of
Common  Stock
Outstanding
  Sole Voting
and Investment
Powers
   Shared Voting
or Investment
Powers
   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percentage of
Common Stock
Outstanding
 

Dennis P. Angner*

  18,712          18,712     0.25  19,378          19,378     0.25

Jeffrey J. Barnes

       5,837     5,837     0.08       6,040     6,040     0.08

Richard J. Barz*

  18,911          18,911     0.25  19,579          19,579     0.26

Sandra L. Caul

       10,609     10,609     0.14       10,609     10,609     0.14

James C. Fabiano

  272,708     6,773     279,481     3.67

G. Charles Hubscher

  28,860     3,523     32,383     0.43  29,865     3,646     33,511     0.44

Thomas L. Kleinhardt

       31,546     31,546     0.41       31,991     31,991     0.42

Joseph LaFramboise

  200     937     1,137     0.01  200     969     1,169     0.02

Wilson C. Lauer

  187          187     0.00

David J. Maness

  480     1,274     1,754     0.02  497     1,100     1,597     0.02

W. Joseph Manifold

  2,107          2,107     0.03  4,827          4,827     0.06

W. Michael McGuire

  116,462          116,462     1.53  116,462          116,462     1.52

Dale D. Weburg

  28,665     32,620     61,285     0.80

Timothy M. Miller

  258     3,428     3,686     0.05  287     3,723     4,010     0.05

Sarah R. Opperman

  449          449     0.01

Steven D. Pung

  9,752     8,647     18,399     0.24  10,092     9,115     19,207     0.25

David J. Reetz

  8,871     181     9,051     0.12  9,100     187     9,287     0.12
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

All Directors, nominees and Executive

Officers as a Group (15) persons

  505,985     105,374     611,360     8.03  210,923     67,380     278,303     3.64
 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

*Trustees of the ESOP who vote ESOP stock.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC as theour independent auditors of the Corporation for the year ending December 31, 2012.2013.

A representative of Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders and to make any comments Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC believes are appropriate.

Fees for Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC

The following table shows the aggregate fees billed by Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC for the audit and other services provided to the Corporation for 20112012 and 2010.2011.

 

 2011  2010  2012   2011 

Audit fees

 $253,920    $252,163   $263,180    $253,920  

Audit related fees

  17,510     39,089    28,250     17,510  

Tax fees

  20,175     24,730    25,950     20,175  
 

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

 $291,605    $315,982   $317,380    $291,605  
 

 

    

 

   

 

   

 

 

The audit fees were for performing the integrated audit of the Corporation’sour consolidated annual financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reportingattestation report related to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act, review of interim quarterly financial statements included in the Corporation’sour Forms 10-Q, and services that are normally provided by Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

The audit related fees are typically for various discussions related to the adoption and interpretation of new accounting pronouncements. During 2010,2012, this includes fees for procedures related to an SEC comment letter and other nonrecurring regulatory filings. Also included are fees for auditing of the Corporation’sour employee benefit plans.

The tax fees were for the preparation of the Corporation’s and its subsidiaries’our state and federal tax returns and for consultation with the Corporation on various tax matters.

The Audit Committee has considered whether the services provided by Rehmann Robson P.C.,LLC, other than the audit fees, are compatible with maintaining Rehmann Robson P.C.’sLLC’s independence and believes that the other services provided are compatible.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

All audit and non-audit services over $5,000 to be performed by Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee if those fees are reasonably expected to exceed 5.0% of the current year agreed upon fee for independent audit services. As permitted by the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee has authorized its Chairpersonchairperson to pre-approve audit, audit-related, tax and non-audit services, provided that such approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.

As early as practicable in each calendar year, the independent auditor provides to the Audit Committee a schedule of the audit and other services that the independent auditor expects to provide or may provide during the next twelve months. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed services, the proposed fees, timing, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline the proposed services. Upon approval, this schedule will serve as the budget for fees by specific activity or service for the next twelve months.

A schedule of additional services proposed to be provided by the independent auditor, or proposed revisions to services already approved, along with associated proposed fees, may be presented to the Audit Committee for their consideration and approval at any time. The schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed service, the proposed fee, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline authorization for each proposed new service.

Applicable SEC rules and regulations permit waiver of the pre-approval requirements for services other than audit, review or attest services if certain conditions are met. Out of the services characterized above as audit-related, tax and professional services, none were billed pursuant to these provisions in 2012 and 2011 and 2010 without pre-approval as required under the Corporation’s policies.pre-approval.

Shareholder Proposals

Any proposals which shareholders of the Corporationyou intend to present at the next annual meeting of the Corporation must be received before December 6, 201212, 2013 to be considered for inclusion in the Corporation’sour proxy statement and proxy for that meeting. Proposals should be made in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 14a-8.

Directors’ Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders

The Corporation’sOur directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. At the 20112012 annual meeting, all directors were in attendance with the exception of Fabiano.attendance.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Corporation’sour directors and certain officers and persons who own more than ten percent10% of the Corporation’sour common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Corporation’sour common stock. These officers, directors, and greater than ten percent10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Corporationus with copies of these reports.

To the Corporation’sour knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished, to the Corporation, during the year ended December 31, 20112012 all Section 16(a) filing requirements were satisfied, with respect to the applicable officers, directors, and greater than 10 percent10% beneficial owners.owners with the exception of directors Lauer and Opperman. Directors Lauer and Opperman did not file their Form 3s, which were due on July 16, 2012, until July 19, 2012.

Other Matters

TheWe will bear the cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Corporation.proxies. In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and other employees of the Corporation may solicit proxies by telephone or in person, without compensation other than their regular compensation.

As to Other Business Which May Come Before the Meeting

Management of the Corporation doesWe do not intend to bring any other business before the meeting for action. However, if any other business should be presented for action, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote in accordance with their judgment on such business.

By order of the Board of Directors

 

LOGO

Debra Campbell, Secretary

Isabella Bank Corporation

Financial Information Index

 

Page  Description
  21  

Summary of Selected Financial Data

  22  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  23  

Consolidated Financial Statements

  28  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  7374  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  97

100

  

Common Stock and Dividend Information

100

Shareholders’ Information

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

 

   2011  2010  2009  2008  2007 

INCOME STATEMENT DATA

      

Total interest income

  $57,905   $57,217   $58,105   $61,385   $53,972  

Net interest income

   41,702    40,013    38,266    35,779    28,013  

Provision for loan losses

   3,826    4,857    6,093    9,500    1,211  

Net income

   10,210    9,045    7,800    4,101    7,930  

BALANCE SHEET DATA

      

End of year assets

  $1,337,925   $1,225,810   $1,143,944   $1,139,263   $957,282  

Daily average assets

   1,287,195    1,182,930    1,127,634    1,113,102    925,631  

Daily average deposits

   927,186    840,392    786,714    817,041    727,762  

Daily average loans/net

   730,919    712,272    712,965    708,434    596,739  

Daily average equity

   145,725    139,855    139,810    143,626    119,246  

PER SHARE DATA

      

Earnings per share

      

Basic

  $1.35   $1.20   $1.04   $0.55   $1.14  

Diluted

   1.31    1.17    1.01    0.53    1.11  

Cash dividends

   0.76    0.72    0.70    0.65    0.62  

Book value (at year end)

   20.40    19.23    18.69    17.89    17.58  

FINANCIAL RATIOS

      

Shareholders’ equity to assets (at year end)

   11.57  11.84  12.31  11.80  12.86

Return on average equity

   7.01    6.47    5.58    2.86    6.65  

Return on average tangible equity

   10.30    9.55    8.53    4.41    8.54  

Cash dividend payout to net income

   56.51    59.93    67.40    118.82    54.27  

Return on average assets

   0.79    0.76    0.69    0.37    0.86  
   2012  2011  2010  2009  2008 

INCOME STATEMENT DATA

      

Interest income

  $56,401   $57,905   $57,217   $58,105   $61,385  

Interest expense

   13,423    16,203    17,204    19,839    25,606  

Net interest income

   42,978    41,702    40,013    38,266    35,779  

Provision for loan losses

   2,300    3,826    4,857    6,093    9,500  

Noninterest income

   11,530    8,218    9,300    10,156    7,802  

Noninterest expenses

   37,639    34,530    33,807    33,683    30,704  

Federal income tax expense

   2,363    1,354    1,604    846    (724

Net Income

  $12,206   $10,210   $9,045   $7,800   $4,101  

PER SHARE

      

Basic earnings

  $1.61   $1.35   $1.20   $1.04   $0.55  

Diluted earnings

   1.56    1.31    1.17    1.01    0.53  

Dividends

   0.80    0.76    0.72    0.70    0.65  

Market value*

   21.75    23.70    17.30    18.95    25.50  

Tangible book value*

   14.72    13.90    13.22    12.67    12.27  

BALANCE SHEET DATA

      

At end of period

      

Loans

  $772,753   $750,291   $735,304   $723,316   $735,385  

Total assets

   1,430,639    1,337,925    1,225,810    1,143,944    1,139,263  

Deposits

   1,017,667    958,164    877,339    802,652    775,630  

Shareholders’ equity

   164,489    154,783    145,161    140,803    134,476  

Average balance

      

Loans

  $754,304   $743,441   $725,534   $725,299   $717,040  

Total assets

   1,381,083    1,287,195    1,182,930    1,127,634    1,113,102  

Deposits

   984,927    927,186    840,392    786,714    817,041  

Shareholders’ equity

   160,682    151,379    145,304    137,910    142,597  

PERFORMANCE RATIOS

      

Return on average total assets

   0.88  0.79  0.76  0.69  0.37

Return on average shareholders’ equity

   7.60  6.74  6.22  5.66  2.88

Return on average tangible equity

   11.41  10.30  9.51  8.53  4.41

Net interest margin yield (FTE)

   3.70  3.87  4.04  4.06  3.87

Loan to deposit*

   75.93  78.31  83.81  90.12  94.81

Nonperforming loans to total loans*

   1.00  0.95  0.83  1.28  1.69

Nonperforming assets to total assets*

   0.68  0.67  0.67  0.91  1.35

ALLL to nonperforming loans*

   154.39  173.10  202.97  139.71  96.42

CAPITAL RATIOS

      

Shareholders’ equity to assets*

   11.50  11.57  11.84  12.31  11.80

Tier 1 capital to average assets*

   8.29  8.18  8.24  8.60  8.42

Tier 1 risk-based capital*

   13.23  12.92  12.44  12.80  12.30

Total risk-based capital*

   14.48  14.17  13.69  14.06  13.50

 

  2011  2010 
   4th  3rd  2nd  1st  4th  3rd  2nd  1st 

Quarterly Operating Results:

        

Total interest income

 $14,466   $14,532   $14,669   $14,238   $14,540   $14,306   $14,272   $14,099  

Interest expense

  3,979    4,070    4,101    4,053    4,217    4,296    4,291    4,400  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net interest income

  10,487    10,462    10,568    10,185    10,323    10,010    9,981    9,699  

Provision for loan losses

  1,443    963    603    817    1,626    968    1,056    1,207  

Noninterest income

  2,433    1,859    1,978    1,948    2,629    2,634    1,870    2,167  

Noninterest expenses

  8,651    8,513    8,779    8,587    8,558    8,620    8,275    8,354  

Net income

  2,711    2,511    2,672    2,316    2,318    2,553    2,151    2,023  

Per Share of Common Stock:

        

Earnings per share

        

Basic

 $0.36   $0.33   $0.35   $0.31   $0.30   $0.34   $0.29   $0.27  

Diluted

  0.35    0.32    0.34    0.30    0.30    0.33    0.28    0.26  

Cash dividends

  0.19    0.19    0.19    0.19    0.18    0.18    0.18    0.18  

Book value (at quarter end)

  20.40    20.53    20.00    19.52    19.23    19.59    19.39    18.89  
*At end of period

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors

Isabella Bank Corporation

Mount Pleasant, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets ofIsabella Bank Corporationas of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, and the related consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity, income, comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011.2012. We also have auditedIsabella Bank Corporation’sinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2012, based on criteria established in theInternal Control-Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).Isabella Bank Corporation’smanagement is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the effectiveness ofIsabella Bank Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting, based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the corporation; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position ofIsabella Bank Corporation as of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20112012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinionIsabella Bank Corporationmaintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011,2012, based on the criteria established in theInternal Control-Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.

 

LOGO

Rehmann Robson P.C.LLC

Saginaw, Michigan

March 6, 201211, 2013

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  December 31,   December 31, 2013 
  2011   2010   2012   2011 

ASSETS

ASSETS

  

ASSETS

  

Cash and cash equivalents

        

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

  $24,514    $16,978    $22,634    $24,514  

Interest bearing balances due from banks

   4,076     1,131     2,286     4,076  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

   28,590     18,109     24,920     28,590  

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   8,924     15,808     4,465     8,924  

Trading securities

   4,710     5,837     1,573     4,710  

Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $414,614 in 2011 and $329,435 in 2010)

   425,120     330,724  

AFS securities (amortized cost of $490,420 in 2012 and $414,614 in 2011)

   504,010     425,120  

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

   3,205     1,182     3,633     3,205  

Loans

        

Commercial

   371,505     365,714  

Agricultural

   74,645     71,446     83,606     74,645  

Commercial

   365,714     348,852  

Residential real estate

   284,148     278,360  

Consumer

   31,572     30,977     33,494     31,572  

Residential real estate mortgage

   278,360     284,029  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total loans

   750,291     735,304     772,753     750,291  

Less allowance for loan losses

   12,375     12,373     11,936     12,375  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net loans

   737,916     722,931     760,817     737,916  

Premises and equipment

   24,626     24,627     25,787     24,626  

Corporate owned life insurance

   22,075     17,466     22,773     22,075  

Accrued interest receivable

   5,848     5,456     5,227     5,848  

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

   17,189     17,564     18,118     17,189  

Goodwill and other intangible assets

   46,792     47,091     46,532     46,792  

Other assets

   12,930     19,015     12,784     12,930  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $1,337,925    $1,225,810    $1,430,639    $1,337,925  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

Deposits

        

Noninterest bearing

  $119,072    $104,902    $143,735    $119,072  

NOW accounts

   163,653     142,259     181,259     163,653  

Certificates of deposit under $100 and other savings

   440,123     425,981     455,546     440,123  

Certificates of deposit over $100

   235,316     204,197     237,127     235,316  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deposits

   958,164     877,339     1,017,667     958,164  

Borrowed funds ($5,242 in 2011 and $10,423 in 2010 at fair value)

   216,136     194,917  

Borrowed funds ($0 in 2012 and $5,242 in 2011 at fair value)

   241,001     216,136  

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

   8,842     8,393     7,482     8,842  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,183,142     1,080,649     1,266,150     1,183,142  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Shareholders’ equity

        

Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,589,226 (including 16,585 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2011 and 7,550,074 (including 32,686 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2010

   134,734     133,592  

Common stock — no par value 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 7,671,846 shares (including 5,130 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2012 and 7,589,226 shares (including 16,585 shares held in the Rabbi Trust) in 2011

   136,580     134,734  

Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations

   4,524     4,682     3,734     4,524  

Retained earnings

   13,036     8,596     19,168     13,036  

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

   2,489     (1,709

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   5,007     2,489  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   154,783     145,161     164,489     154,783  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

  $1,337,925    $1,225,810  

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $1,430,639    $1,337,925  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS'SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

 

 Common Stock
Shares
Outstanding
 Common
Stock
 Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
 Totals  Common Stock
Shares
Outstanding
 Common
Stock
 Shares to be
Issued for
Deferred
Compensation
Obligations
 Retained
Earnings
 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
 Totals 

Balance, January 1, 2009

  7,518,856   $133,602   $4,015   $2,428   $(5,569 $134,476  

Comprehensive income

              7,800    3,450    11,250  

Issuance of common stock

  126,059    2,664                2,664  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  12,890    331    (185          146  

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          677            677  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (767        (767

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (122,612  (2,387           (2,387

Cash dividends ($0.70 per share)

              (5,256      (5,256
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2009

  7,535,193    133,443    4,507    4,972    (2,119  140,803  

Balances, January 1, 2010

  7,535,193   $133,443   $4,507   $4,972   $(2,119 $140,803  

Comprehensive income

              9,045    410    9,455                9,045    410    9,455  

Issuance of common stock

  124,953    2,683                2,683    124,953    2,683                2,683  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  28,898    537    (475          62    28,898    537    (475          62  

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          650            650            650            650  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (514        (514      (514        (514

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (138,970  (2,557           (2,557  (138,970  (2,557           (2,557

Cash dividends ($0.72 per share)

              (5,421      (5,421              (5,421      (5,421
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2010

  7,550,074    133,592    4,682    8,596    (1,709  145,161  

Balances, December 31, 2010

  7,550,074    133,592    4,682    8,596    (1,709  145,161  

Comprehensive income

              10,210    4,198    14,408                10,210    4,198    14,408  

Issuance of common stock

  120,336    3,075                3,075    120,336    3,075                3,075  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  39,257    697    (773          (76  39,257    697    (773          (76

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          615            615            615            615  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (426              (426      (426              (426

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (120,441  (2,204           (2,204  (120,441  (2,204           (2,204

Cash dividends ($0.76 per share)

              (5,770      (5,770              (5,770      (5,770
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

  7,589,226   $134,734   $4,524   $13,036   $2,489   $154,783  

Balances, December 31, 2011

  7,589,226    134,734    4,524    13,036    2,489    154,783  

Comprehensive income

              12,206    2,518    14,724  

Issuance of common stock

  124,530    2,898                2,898  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

  41,676    814    (814            

Common stock transferred from the

      

Rabbi Trust to satisfy deferred compensation obligations

      619    (619            

Share based payment awards under equity compensation plan

          643            643  

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

      (505              (505

Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced repurchase plan

  (83,586  (1,980              (1,980

Cash dividends ($0.80 per share)

              (6,074      (6,074
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Balances, December 31, 2012

  7,671,846   $136,580   $3,734   $19,168   $5,007   $164,489  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

 

  Year Ended December 31   Year Ended December 31 
  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011   2010 

Interest income

         

Loans, including fees

  $45,463   $46,794   $47,706    $43,396   $45,463    $46,794  

Investment securities

    

AFS securities

     

Taxable

   6,941    5,271    4,712     7,555    6,941     5,271  

Nontaxable

   4,806    4,367    4,623     4,870    4,806     4,367  

Trading account securities

   189    306    687  

Trading securities

   94    189     306  

Federal funds sold and other

   506    479    377     486    506     479  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total interest income

   57,905    57,217    58,105     56,401    57,905     57,217  

Interest expense

         

Deposits

   10,935    11,530    13,588     9,131    10,935     11,530  

Borrowings

   5,268    5,674    6,251     4,292    5,268     5,674  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total interest expense

   16,203    17,204    19,839     13,423    16,203     17,204  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net interest income

   41,702    40,013    38,266     42,978    41,702     40,013  

Provision for loan losses

   3,826    4,857    6,093     2,300    3,826     4,857  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

   37,876    35,156    32,173     40,678    37,876     35,156  

Noninterest income

         

Service charges and fees

   6,118    6,480    6,913     6,432    6,118     6,480  

Gain on sale of mortgage loans

   538    610    886     1,576    538     610  

Net (loss) gain on trading securities

   (78  (94  80  

Net gain on borrowings measured at fair value

   181    227    289  

Gain on sale of available-for-sale investment securities

   3    348    648     1,119    3     348  

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies

   698    609     663  

Other

   1,456    1,729    1,340     1,705    950     1,199  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total noninterest income

   8,218    9,300    10,156     11,530    8,218     9,300  

Noninterest expenses

         

Compensation and benefits

   19,292    18,552    18,258     21,227    19,292     18,552  

Occupancy

   2,470    2,351    2,170     2,519    2,470     2,351  

Furniture and equipment

   4,497    4,344    4,146     4,560    4,497     4,344  

FDIC insurance premiums

   1,086    1,254    1,730  
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Available-for-sale impairment loss

     

Total other-than-temporary impairment loss

   486           

Portion of loss reported in other comprehensive income

   (204         
  

 

  

 

   

 

 

Net available-for-sale impairment loss

   282           

Other

   7,185    7,306    7,379     9,051    8,271     8,560  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

   34,530    33,807    33,683     37,639    34,530     33,807  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Income before federal income tax expense

   11,564    10,649    8,646     14,569    11,564     10,649  

Federal income tax expense

   1,354    1,604    846     2,363    1,354     1,604  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

NET INCOME

  $10,210   $9,045   $7,800    $12,206   $10,210    $9,045  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Earnings per share

         

Basic

  $1.35   $1.20   $1.04    $1.61   $1.35    $1.20  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Diluted

  $1.31   $1.17   $1.01    $1.56   $1.31    $1.17  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Cash dividends per basic share

  $0.76   $0.72   $0.70    $0.80   $0.76    $0.72  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  Year Ended December 31   Year Ended December 31 
  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Net income

  $10,210   $9,045   $7,800    $12,206   $10,210   $9,045  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities:

        

Unrealized gains arising during the year

   9,220    1,156    3,415     3,921    9,220    1,156  

Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net income

   (3  (348  (648   (1,119  (3  (348

Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income

   282    —      —    
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net unrealized gains

   9,217    808    2,767     3,084    9,217    808  

Tax effect

   (3,719  (351  436  

Tax effect(1)

   (348  (3,719  (351
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Unrealized gains, net of tax

   5,498    457    3,203     2,736    5,498    457  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

(Increase) reduction of unrecognized pension costs

   (1,971  (72  374  

Increase in unrecognized pension costs

   (329  (1,971  (72

Tax effect

   671    25    (127   111    671    25  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net unrealized (loss) gain on defined benefit pension plan

   (1,300  (47  247  

Net unrealized loss on defined benefit pension plan

   (218  (1,300  (47
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

   4,198    410    3,450     2,518    4,198    410  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Comprehensive income

  $14,408   $9,455   $11,250    $14,724   $14,408   $9,455  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

(1)See “Note 12 — Federal Income Taxes” for tax effect reconciliation.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  Year Ended December 31   Year Ended December 31 
  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

        

Net income

  $10,210   $9,045   $7,800    $12,206   $10,210   $9,045  

Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operations:

        

Provision for loan losses

   3,826    4,857    6,093     2,300    3,826    4,857  

Impairment of foreclosed assets

   82    180    157     166    82    180  

Depreciation

   2,521    2,522    2,349     2,417    2,521    2,522  

Amortization and impairment of originated mortgage servicing rights

   714    543    683     787    714    543  

Amortization of acquisition intangibles

   299    338    375     260    299    338  

Net amortization of available-for-sale securities

   1,689    1,153    741     2,277    1,689    1,153  

Available-for-sale security impairment loss

   282          

Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

   (3  (348  (648   (1,119  (3  (348

Net unrealized losses (gains) on trading securities

   78    94    (80

Net unrealized losses on trading securities

   52    78    94  

Net gain on sale of mortgage loans

   (538  (610  (886   (1,576  (538  (610

Net unrealized gains on borrowings measured at fair value

   (181  (227  (289   (33  (181  (227

Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance

   (609  (642  (641   (698  (609  (642

Realized gain on redemption of corporate owned life insurance

       (21               (21

Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan

   615    650    677     643    615    650  

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

   389    179    (641

Deferred income tax expense

   616    389    179  

Origination of loans held for sale

   (57,584  (72,106  (153,388   (99,353  (57,584  (72,106

Proceeds from loan sales

   56,099    73,815    152,891     100,501    56,099    73,815  

Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:

        

Trading securities

   1,049    7,632    8,292     3,085    1,049    7,632  

Accrued interest receivable

   (392  376    490     621    (392  376  

Other assets

   147    (1,914  (6,331   (2,610  147    (1,914

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

   449    1,005    581     (1,360  449    1,005  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   18,860    26,521    18,225     19,464    18,860    26,521  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

        

Net change in certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   6,884    (10,428  (4,805   4,459    6,884    (10,428

Activity in available-for-sale securities

        

Maturities, calls, and sales

   78,152    85,273    130,580  

Sales

   40,677    8,877    18,303  

Maturities and calls

   89,112    69,275    66,970  

Purchases

   (165,017  (156,928  (140,517   (207,035  (165,017  (156,928

Loan principal originations and collections, net

   (20,743  (21,319  4,437  

Loan principal originations, net

   (27,103  (20,743  (21,319

Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets

   2,041    2,778    4,145     1,594    2,041    2,778  

Purchases of premises and equipment

   (2,520  (3,232  (3,035   (3,578  (2,520  (3,232

Purchases of corporate owned life insurance

   (4,000  (175           (4,000  (175

Proceeds from the redemption of corporate owned life insurance

       154    11  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (105,203  (103,877  (9,184   (101,874  (105,203  (103,877
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

        

Acceptances and withdrawals of deposits, net

  $80,825   $74,687   $27,022     59,503    80,825   $74,687  

Increase (decrease) in other borrowed funds

   21,400    2,043    (28,960

Increase in other borrowed funds

   24,898    21,400    2,043  

Cash dividends paid on common stock

   (5,770  (5,421  (5,256   (6,074  (5,770  (5,421

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   2,302    2,208    2,479     2,279    2,302    2,208  

Common stock repurchased

   (1,507  (2,020  (2,056   (1,361  (1,507  (2,020

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

   (426  (514  (767   (505  (426  (514
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   96,824    70,983    (7,538

Net cash provided by financing activities

   78,740    96,824    70,983  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   10,481    (6,373  1,503  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

   18,109    24,482    22,979  

(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   (3,670  10,481    (6,373

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   28,590    18,109    24,482  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

  $28,590   $18,109   $24,482  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

  $24,920   $28,590   $18,109  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:

        

Interest paid

  $16,239   $17,344   $20,030    $13,639   $16,239   $17,344  

Federal income taxes paid

   878    1,261    2,237     2,357    878    1,261  

SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INFORMATION:

    

SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION:

    

Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets

  $1,932   $3,868   $2,536    $1,902   $1,932   $3,868  

Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations

   773    475    185     619    773    475  

Common stock repurchased from an associated grantor trust (Rabbi Trust)

   (697  (537  (33

Common stock repurchased from the Rabbi Trust

   (619  (697  (537

The accompanyingSee notes are an integral part of theseto interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION:    The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Isabella Bank Corporation, (the “Corporation”), a financial services holding company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Isabella Bank (the “Bank”),and Financial Group Information Services, and IB&T Employee Leasing, LLC.Services. All intercompany balances and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.

NATURE OF OPERATIONS:    Isabella Bank Corporation is a financial services holding company offering a wide array of financial products and services in several mid-Michigan counties. ItsOur banking subsidiary, Isabella Bank, offers banking services through 2526 locations, 24 hour banking services locally and nationally through shared automatic teller machines, 24 hour online banking, and direct deposits to businesses, institutions, and individuals. Lending services offered include commercial loans, agricultural loans, residential real estate loans, and consumer loans. Deposit services include interest and noninterest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of deposit. Other related financial products include trust and investment services, safe deposit box rentals, and credit life insurance. Active competition, principally from other commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions, exists in all of the Corporation’sour principal markets. The Corporation’sOur results of operations can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates or changes in the local economic environment.

Financial Group Information Services provides information technology services to Isabella Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries.

IB&T Employee Leasing provides payroll services, benefit administration, and other human resource services to Isabella Bank Corporation and itsour subsidiaries.

USE OF ESTIMATES:    In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management iswe are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,ALLL, the fair value of certain available-for-saleAFS investment securities, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets, and determinations of assumptions in accounting for the defined benefit pension plan.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:    Fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants in the market in which the reporting entity transacts such sales or transfers based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. Assumptions are developed based on prioritizing information within a fair value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entity’s own data. The CorporationWe may choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value measurement option has been elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option (i) may be applied instrument by instrument, with certain exceptions, allowing the Corporationus to record identical financial assets and liabilities at fair value or by another measurement basis permitted under generally accepted accounting principles, (ii) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs) and (iii) is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments.

For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is the Corporation’sour policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements for those financial instruments for which there is an active market. In cases where the market for a financial asset or liability is not active, the Corporation includeswe include appropriate risk adjustments that market participants would make for nonperformance and liquidity risks when developing fair value measurements. Fair value measurements for assets and liabilities for

which limited or no observable market data exists are accordingly based primarily upon estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or liability and other factors. Therefore, the results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, could significantly affect the results of current or future values.

The Corporation utilizesWe utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Investment securities available-for-sale,AFS, trading securities, and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Corporationwe may be required to record other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as mortgage loans available-for-sale,AFS, impaired loans, foreclosed assets, originated mortgage servicing rights,OMSR, goodwill, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write downs of individual assets.

Fair Value Hierarchy

Under fair value measurement and disclosure authoritative guidance, the Corporation groupswe group assets and liabilities measured at fair value into three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded, and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value, based on the prioritization of inputs in the valuation techniques. These levels are:

Level 1:    Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2:    Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3:    Valuation is generated from model based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Transfers between measurement levels are recognized at the end of reporting periods.

For a further discussion of fair value considerations, refer to Note“Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements.— Fair Value.”

SIGNIFICANT GROUP CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK:    Most of the Corporation’sour activities conducted are with customers located within the central Michigan area. A significant amount of itsour outstanding loans are secured by commercial and residential real estate. Other than these types of loans, there is no significant concentration to any other industry or any one customer.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:    For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from banks, federal funds sold, and other deposit accounts. Generally, federal funds sold are for a one day period. The Corporation maintainsWe maintain deposit accounts in various financial institutions which generally exceed federally insured limits or are not insured. Management doesWe do not believe the Company iswe are exposed to any significant interest, credit or other financial risk as a result of these deposits.

CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT HELD IN OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS:Certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions consist of interest bearing certificates of deposit that mature within 3 years and are carried at cost.

TRADING SECURITIES:    The Corporation engagesWe engage in trading activities of itsour own accounts. Securities that are held principally for resale in the near term are recorded in the trading assets account at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest income is included in net interest income.

AVAILAAFS SECURITIES:    BLE-FOR-SALE INVESTMENT SECURITIES:    All purchasesPurchases of investment securities are generally classified as available-for-sale.AFS. However, classification of investmentwe may elect to classify securities as either held to maturity or trading may be elected by management of the Corporation.trading. Securities classified as available-for-saleAFS are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of the effect of deferred income taxes, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. AuctionIncluded in AFS securities are auction rate money market preferred securitiespreferreds and preferred stocksstocks. These investments are considered equity securities for federal income tax purposes, and as such, no estimated federal income tax impact is expected or recorded. Auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stockstocks are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses considered not other-than-temporary, excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale investmentAFS securities are determined using the specific identification method.

InvestmentAFS securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”).OTTI. In determining whether an other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI exists for debt securities, managementwe must assert that: (a) it doeswe do not have the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely than not itwe will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. If these conditions are not met, the Corporationwe must recognize an other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI charge through earnings for the difference between the debt security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value, and such amount is included in noninterest income. For debt securities that do not meet the above criteria, and the Corporation doeswe do not expect to recover the security’s amortized cost basis, the security is considered other-than-temporarily impaired. For these debt securities, the Corporation separateswe separate the total impairment into the credit risk loss component and the amount of the loss related to market and other risk factors. In order to determine the amount of the credit loss for a debt security, the Corporation calculateswe calculate the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the current cash flows and future cash flows management expectswe expect to recover. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI related to the credit risk is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI related to other risk factors is recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. For debt securities that have recognized an other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI through earnings, if through subsequent evaluation there is a significant increase in the cash flow expected, the difference between the amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected is accreted as interest income.

Available-for-saleAFS equity securities are reviewed for other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI at each reporting date. This evaluation considers a number of factors including, but not limited to, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and management’sour ability and intent to hold the securities until fair value recovers. If it is determined that management doeswe do not have the ability and intent to hold the securities until recovery or that there are conditions that indicate that a security may not recover in value then the difference between the fair value and the cost of the security is recognized in earnings and is included in noninterest income. No such losses for debt or equity securities were recognized in 2011, 2010, or 2009.

LOANS:    Loans that management haswe have the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loans losses,ALLL, and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.

The accrual of interest on agricultural, commercial and mortgage loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged offcharged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

For loans that are placed on non-accrualnonaccrual status or charged off,charged-off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected is charged against the allowance for loan losses.ALLL. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:    The allowance for loan lossesALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believeswe believe the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluatedWe evaluate the ALLL on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’sour periodic review of the collectibilitycollectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The allowanceALLL consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are deemed to be impaired. For such loans that are also analyzed for specific allowance allocations, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows or collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non classified loans and is based on historical loss experience. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that management believeswe believe affect itsour estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:

1.  There has been a chargeoffcharge-off of its principal balance;

2.  The loan has been classified as a troubled debt restructuring;TDR; or

3.  The loan is in nonaccrual status.

Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for agriculturalcommercial and commercialagricultural loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.

LOANS HELD FOR SALE:Mortgage loans originated and intendedheld for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as determined by aggregating outstanding commitments from investors or current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses, if any, arewould be recognized throughas a valuation allowancecomponent of which the provision is accounted for in other noninterest expenses in the consolidated statements of income.expenses.

Mortgage loans held for sale are sold with the mortgage servicing rights retained by the Corporation.us. The carrying value of mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or losses on sales of mortgage loans are recognized based on the difference between the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage loans sold.

TRANSFERS OF FINANCIAL ASSETS:    Transfers of financial assets, including mortgage loans and participation loans are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is determined to be surrendered when 1) the assets have been legally isolated from the Corporation,us, 2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of the right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and 3) the Corporation doeswe do not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. Other than servicing, the Corporation haswe have no substantive continuing involvement related to these loans.

SERVICING:Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial assets. The Corporation hasWe have no purchased servicing rights. For sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively, is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing

income, such as the cost to service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses.

Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the tranche. If the Corporationwe later determinesdetermine that all or a portion of the impairment no longer exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the valuation allowance may be recorded as an increase to income. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. The unpaid principal balance of mortgages serviced for others was $304,626$303,351 and $309,882$304,626 with capitalized servicing rights of $2,374$2,285 and $2,667$2,374 at December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively.

Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing loans for others. The fees are based on a contractual percentage of the outstanding principal; or a fixed amount per loan and are recorded as income when earned. The CorporationWe recorded servicing fee revenue of $757, $732, $760, and $724$760 related to residential mortgage loans serviced for others during 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009,2010, respectively and is included in other non interestnoninterest income.

LOANS ACQUIRED THROUGH TRANSFER:    Authoritative accounting guidance related to acquired loans requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at acquisition. This standard applies to any loan acquired in a transfer that shows evidence of credit quality deterioration since it was originated.

FORECLOSED ASSETS:    Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at the lower of the Corporation’sour carrying amount or fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any write downswrite-downs based on the asset’s fair value at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan losses.ALLL. After foreclosure, property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost basis or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on property to be held and used are measured at the amount by which the carrying amount of property exceeds its fair value. Costs relating to holding these assets are expensed as incurred. Valuations areWe periodically performed by management,perform valuations and any subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations, if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the lower of the Corporation’sour carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Foreclosed assets of $1,876$2,018 and $2,067$1,876 as of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively, are included in Other Assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.other assets.

PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT:    Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation which is computed principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 40 years. Major improvements are capitalized and appropriately amortized based upon the useful lives of the related assets or the expected terms of the leases,

if shorter, using the straight-line method. Maintenance, repairs and minor alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures occur. ManagementWe annually reviewsreview these assets to determine whether carrying values have been impaired.

FDIC INSURANCE PREMIUMPREMIUM::    In 2009, the Corporation was required to prepay quarterly    Included in other assets were prepaid FDIC risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009$1,804 and each of the quarters in the years ending December 31, 2010, 2011 and 2012. The assessments for 2010 through 2012, which had a carrying balance of $2,588 and $3,586 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, respectively, have been recorded as a prepaid asset in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in Other Assets, and will be expensed on a ratable basis quarterly through December 31, 2012.respectively.

EQUITY SECURITIES WITHOUT READILY DETERMINABLE FAIR VALUES:    Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost,FHLB Stock and investmentsFRB Stock as well as our ownership interests in nonconsolidated entities accountedCorporate Settlement Solutions and Valley Financial Corporation. The investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions, a title insurance company, was made in the 1st quarter 2007. The Corporation is not the managing entity of Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, and accounts for its investment in that entity under the equity method of accounting. Valley Financial Corporation is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a de novo bank that opened in 2005. The Corporation made investments in Valley Financial Corporation in 2004 and in 2007.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values consist of the following as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2012   2011 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

  $7,380    $7,596    $7,850    $7,380  

Investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions

   6,611     6,793     7,040     6,611  

Federal Reserve Bank Stock

   1,879     1,879     1,879     1,879  

Investment in Valley Financial Corporation

   1,000     1,000     1,000     1,000  

Other

   319     296     349     319  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $17,189    $17,564    $18,118    $17,189  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN:    At December 31, 2011,2012, the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred CompensationDirectors Plan for Directors (the “Directors Plan”) had 218,023170,566 shares eligible to be issued to participants, for which an associated grantor trust (Rabbi Trust)the Rabbi Trust held 16,5855,130 shares. The CorporationWe had 224,663218,023 shares to be issued in 2010,2011, with 32,68616,585 shares held in the Rabbi Trust. Compensation costs relating to share based payment transactions are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as the services are rendered, with the cost measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued (see “Equity Compensation Plan” in Note 17.“Note 17 — Benefit Plans”) The Corporation has. We have no other share-basedequity-based compensation plans.

CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE:    The Corporation hasWe have purchased life insurance policies on key members of management. In the event of death of one of these individuals, the Corporationwe would receive a specified cash payment equal to the face value of the policy. Such policies are recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can be realized on the balance sheet dates. Increases in cash surrender value in excess of single premiums paid are reported as Other Noninterest Income.other noninterest income.

As of December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the present value of the post retirement benefits payable by the Corporationus to the covered employees was estimated to be $2,633$2,657 and $2,573,$2,633, respectively, and is included in Accrued Interest Payableaccrued interest payable and Other Liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.other liabilities . The periodic policy maintenance costs were $24, $60, and $68 for 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.respectively and is included in other noninterest expenses.

ACQUISITION INTANGIBLES AND GOODWILL:    The CorporationWe previously acquired branch facilities and related deposits in business combinations accounted for as a purchase. The acquisitions included amounts related to the valuation of customer deposit relationships (core deposit intangibles). Core deposit intangibles arising from acquisitions are included in Other Assetsgoodwill and other intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated lives and evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Goodwill which is included in Other Assets, represents the excess of purchase price over identifiable assets, is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment on at least an annual basis. Goodwill isAcquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired, management performswe perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the

potential impairment. Acquisition intangibles are tested for impairment with a cash flow valuation. This valuation method requires a significant degree of managementour judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows for these intangible assets are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model.

OFF BALANCE SHEET CREDIT RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:    In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation haswe have entered into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under credit card arrangements, home equity lines of credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.

FEDERAL INCOME TAXES:    Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax assets or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases on the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. Valuation allowances are established, where necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable or refundable for the year plus or minus the change during the year in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

The Corporation analyzes its

We analyze our filing positions in the jurisdictions where it is required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The Corporation hasWe have also elected to retain itsour existing accounting policy with respect to the treatment of interest and penalties attributable to income taxes, and continuescontinue to reflect any charges for such, to the extent they arise, as a component of itsour noninterest expenses.

MARKETING COSTS:    Marketing costs are expensed as incurred (see Note 11)“Note 11 — Other Noninterest Expenses”).

RECLASSIFICATIONS:    Certain amounts reported in the 20102011 and 20092010 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 20112012 presentation.

NOTE 2 — COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.year. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustments to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that we may be issued by the Corporationissue relate solely to outstanding shares in the Directors Plan, see Note 17.“Note 17 — Benefit Plans.”

Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Average number of common shares outstanding for basic calculation

   7,572,841     7,541,676     7,517,276     7,604,303     7,572,841     7,541,676  

Average potential effect of shares in the Directors Plan(1)

   194,634     187,744     181,319     195,063     194,634     187,744  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share

   7,767,475     7,729,420     7,698,595     7,799,366     7,767,475     7,729,420  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

  $10,210    $9,045    $7,800    $12,206    $10,210    $9,045  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Earnings per share

            

Basic

  $1.35    $1.20    $1.04    $1.61    $1.35    $1.20  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Diluted

  $1.31    $1.17    $1.01    $1.56    $1.31    $1.17  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

(1)Exclusive of shares held in the Rabbi Trust

NOTE 3 — ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Updates

Accounting Standards Update (ASU)ASU No. 2010-06:2011-03:Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurement”Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements”

In January 2010,April 2011, ASU No. 2010-062011-03 amended Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)ASC Topic 310, “Transfers and Servicing” to eliminate from the assessment of effective control, the criteria calling for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed upon terms, even in the event of the transferee’s default. The assessment of effective control should instead focus on the transferor’s contractual rights and obligations. The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and did not impact our consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-04:“Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS”

In May 2011, ASU No. 2011-04 amended ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”Measurement” to add new disclosures for: (1) significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2align fair value measurements and disclosures in GAAP and IFRS. The ASU changes the reasonswording used to describe the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and disclosures about fair value.

The ASU clarifies the transfersapplication of existing fair value measurements and (2) presenting separately informationdisclosure requirements related to:

The application of highest and best use and valuation premise concepts.

Measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in shareholders’ equity.

Disclosure about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements forfair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The ASU also changes particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information measuring fair value and disclosures related to:

Measuring the fair value of financial instruments (as opposedthat are managed within a portfolio.

Application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement.

The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and did not have a financial impact but increased the level of disclosures related to reporting activity as net).fair value measurements in our consolidated financial statements in 2012.

ASU No. 2010-06 also clarified existing disclosures by requiring2011-05:“Presentation of Comprehensive Income”

In June 2011, ASU No. 2011-05 amended ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income” to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting entities to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and to provide disclosures aboutincrease the valuation techniquesprominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. In addition, to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income, and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurringfacilitate the convergence of GAAP and nonrecurring fair value measurements.IFRS, the FASB eliminated the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.

The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances2011 and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The new guidance did not have a significantan impact on the Corporation’sour consolidated financial statements.statements as we have historically elected to present a separate statement of comprehensive income.

ASU No. 2011-01: 2012-02:Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20.”

In January 2011, ASU No. 2011-01 amended ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” to temporarily delay the effective date of new disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings as required in ASU No. 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing ReceivablesIntangibles — Goodwill and the AllowanceOther (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Credit Losses”,Impairment”which was initially intended to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2010. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings was delayed to coordinate with the newly issued guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (ASU No. 2011-02). The new disclosures were effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and increased the level of reporting disclosures related to troubled debt restructurings.

ASU No. 2011-02: “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.”

In April 2011,August 2012, ASU No. 2011-02 amended ASC Topic 310, “Receivables” to clarify authoritative guidance as to what loan modifications constitute concessions, and would therefore be considered a troubled debt restructuring. Classification as a troubled debt restructuring will automatically classify such loans as impaired. ASU No. 2011-02 clarifies that:

If a debtor does not otherwise have access to funds at a market rate for debt with similar risk characteristics as the modified debt, the modification would be considered to be at a below-market rate, which may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession.

A modification that results in a temporary or permanent increase in the contractual interest rate cannot be presumed to be at a rate that is at or above a market rate and therefore could still be considered a concession.

A creditor must consider whether a borrower’s default is “probable” on any of its debt in the foreseeable future when assessing financial difficulty.

A modification that results in an insignificant delay in payments is not a concession.

In addition, ASU No. 2011-02 clarifies that a creditor is precluded from using the effective interest rate test in the debtor’s guidance on modification of payables (ASC Topic 470, “Debt”) when evaluating whether a modification constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The new authoritative guidance was effective for interim

and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and increased the volume of loans that the Corporation classified as troubled debt restructurings and required additional disclosures (see Note 6 – Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses).

ASU No. 2011-08: “Testing Goodwill for Impairment

In September 2011, ASU No. 2011-082012-02 amended ASC Topic 350, “Goodwill and Other” to simplify the testing of goodwill impairments.intangible assets with indefinite lives. This update will allow for a qualitative assessment of goodwillintangible assets with indefinite lives to determine whether or not it is necessary to perform the two-step impairment test described in ASC Topic 350. While the new authoritative guidance iswas effective for fiscal years beginning after DecemberSeptember 15, 2011, the Corporation2012, we elected to early adopt the guidance as of December 31, 2011. The new guidance2012. This standard did not have any impact on the Corporation’sour consolidated financial statements.

Pending Accounting Standards Updates

ASU No. 2011-03: “Reconsideration2012-06:“Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreementsa Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution”

In April 2011,October 2012, ASU No. 2011-032012-06 amended ASC Topic 310, “Transfers and Servicing”805, “Business Combinations” to eliminate fromclarify the assessmentapplicable guidance for subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized as part of effective control, the criteria calling for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem thea government assisted acquisition of a financial assets on substantially the agreed upon terms, even in the event of the transferee’s default. The assessment of effective control should instead focus on the transferor’s contractual rights and obligations.institution. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periodsfiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 20112012 and is not expected to impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-04: “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS

In May 2011, ASU No. 2011-04 amended ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement” to align fair value measurements and disclosures in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The ASU changes the wording used to describe the requirements in GAAP for measuring fair value and disclosures about fair value.

The ASU clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and disclosure requirements related to:

The application of highest and best use and valuation premise concepts.

Measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity’s stockholders’ equity.

Disclosure about fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The ASU also changes particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value and disclosing information measuring fair value and disclosures related to:

Measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio.

Application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement.

The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 andat this time is not expected to have a significantany impact on the Corporation’sour consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2011-05: “Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, ASU No. 2011-05 amended ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income” to improve the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. In addition, to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income, and to facilitate the convergence of GAAP and IFRS, the FASB eliminated the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity.

The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and is not expected to have a significant impact on Corporation’s consolidated financial statements since the Corporation has always elected to present a separate statement of comprehensive income.

NOTE 4 — TRADING SECURITIES

Trading securities, at fair value, consist of the following investments at December 31:

 

   2011   2010 

States and political subdivisions

  $4,710    $5,837  
   2012   2011 

States and political subdivisions

  $1,573    $4,710  

Included in the net trading losses of $52 during 2012, were $18 of net trading losses on securities that relate to our trading portfolio as of December 31, 2012. Included in net trading gains of $78 during 2011, were $60 of net trading lossesgains on securities that relate to the Corporation’sour trading portfolio as of December 31, 2011. Included in net trading gains of $94 during 2010, were $74 of net trading gains on securities that relate to the Corporation’s trading portfolio as of December 31, 2010.

NOTE 5 — AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE INVESTMENTAFS SECURITIES

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale investmentAFS securities, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows as of December 31:

 

  2011   2012 
      Gross   Gross           Gross   Gross     
  Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair   Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair 
  Cost   Gains   Losses   Value   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $395    $2    $    $397    $25,668    $108    $    $25,776  

States and political subdivisions

   166,832     8,157     51     174,938     174,118     9,190     565     182,743  

Auction rate money market preferred

   3,200          1,151     2,049     3,200          422     2,778  

Preferred stocks

   6,800          1,767     5,033     6,800          437     6,363  

Mortgage-backed securities

   140,842     2,807     47     143,602     152,256     3,199     110     155,345  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   96,545     2,556          99,101     128,378     2,627          131,005  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $414,614    $13,522    $3,016    $425,120    $490,420    $15,124    $1,534    $504,010  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

  2010   2011 
      Gross   Gross           Gross   Gross     
  Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair   Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair 
  Cost   Gains   Losses   Value   Cost   Gains   Losses   Value 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $5,394    $10    $    $5,404    $395    $2    $    $397  

States and political subdivisions

   167,328     3,349     960     169,717     166,832     8,157     51     174,938  

Auction rate money market preferred

   3,200          335     2,865     3,200          1,151     2,049  

Preferred stocks

   7,800          864     6,936     6,800          1,767     5,033  

Mortgage-backed securities

   101,096     1,633     514     102,215     140,842     2,807     47     143,602  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   44,617     103     1,133     43,587     96,545     2,556          99,101  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $329,435    $5,095    $3,806    $330,724    $414,614    $13,522    $3,016    $425,120  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-saleAFS securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 20112012 are as follows:

 

  Maturing   

Securities

With

Variable

Monthly

Payments

or

       Maturing   

Securities

With

Variable

Monthly

Payments

or

     
      After One   After Five               After One   After Five         
  Due in   Year But   Years But       Continual       Due in   Year But   Years But         
  One Year   Within   Within   After   Call       One Year   Within   Within   After   Noncontractual     
  or Less   Five Years   Ten Years   Ten Years   Dates   Total   or Less   Five Years   Ten Years   Ten Years   Maturities   Total 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $    $    $395    $    $    $395    $    $72    $25,596    $    $    $25,668  

States and political subdivisions

   8,381     34,610     87,436     36,405          166,832     11,670     36,157     86,062     40,229          174,118  

Auction rate money market preferred

                       3,200     3,200                         3,200     3,200  

Preferred stocks

                       6,800     6,800                         6,800     6,800  

Mortgage-backed securities

                       140,842     140,842                         152,256     152,256  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

                       96,545     96,545                         128,378     128,378  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total amortized cost

  $8,381    $34,610    $87,831    $36,405    $247,387    $414,614    $11,670    $36,229    $111,658    $40,229    $290,634    $490,420  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Fair value

  $8,441    $35,904    $93,586    $37,404    $249,785    $425,120    $11,746    $37,759    $117,884    $41,130    $295,491    $504,010  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Expected maturities for government sponsored enterprises and states and political subdivisions may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

As auction rate money market preferreds and preferred stocks have continual call dates,noncontractual maturities they are not reported by a specific maturity group. Because of their variable monthly payments, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.

A summary of the activity related to the sale of available-for-sale debtAFS securities is as follows during the years ended December 31:

 

  2011   2010 2009   2012   2011   2010 

Proceeds from sales of securities

  $8,877    $18,303   $32,204  

Proceeds from sales AFS of securities

  $40,677    $8,877    $18,303  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Gross realized gains

  $3    $351   $648    $1,119    $3    $351  

Gross realized losses

        (3                 (3
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net realized gains

  $3    $348   $648    $1,119    $3    $348  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Applicable income tax expense

  $1    $118   $220    $380    $1    $118  
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The cost basis used to determine the realized gains or losses of securities sold was the amortized cost of the individual investment security as of the trade date.

Information pertaining to available-for-saleAFS securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31 aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous loss position, follows:

 

  2011   2012 
  Less Than Twelve Months   Over Twelve Months       Less Than Twelve Months   Over Twelve Months     
  Gross       Gross       Total   Gross       Gross       Total 
  Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized 
  Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses 

States and political subdivisions

  $51    $1,410    $    $    $51    $80    $5,019    $485    $2,352    $565  

Auction rate money market preferred

             1,151     2,049     1,151               422     2,778     422  

Preferred stocks

             1,767     5,033     1,767               437     3,363     437  

Mortgage-backed securities

   47     24,291               47     110     25,499               110  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $98    $25,701    $2,918    $7,082    $3,016    $190    $30,518    $1,344    $8,493    $1,534  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:

     6       6     12       15       6     21  
    

 

     

 

   

 

     

 

     

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
   Less Than Twelve Months   Over Twelve Months     
   Gross       Gross       Total 
   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized 
   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses 

States and political subdivisions

  $960    $29,409    $    $    $960  

Auction rate money market preferred

             335     2,865     335  

Preferred stocks

             864     2,936     864  

Mortgage-backed securities

   514     38,734               514  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   1,133     33,880               1,133  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,607    $102,023    $1,199    $5,801    $3,806  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:

     82       4     86  
    

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

As a result of market conditions associated with certain auction rate money market preferred investment securities, $7,800 of the Corporation’s initial investment of $11,000 converted to preferred stocks with debt like characteristics in 2009. Due to the limited trading of these securities in 2009 and 2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair values on December 31, 2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, the current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the interest rates of similarly rated financial institution’s debt based on the weighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90% as of December 31, 2010. During 2011, the markets for these securities have normalized and established regular trading patterns. As such, the Corporation determined the fair value for these securities based on quoted prices for identical securities, or based on quoted prices for similar securities as of December 31, 2011.

   2011 
   Less Than Twelve Months   Over Twelve Months     
   Gross       Gross       Total 
   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized   Fair   Unrealized 
   Losses   Value   Losses   Value   Losses 

States and political subdivisions

  $51    $1,410    $    $    $51  

Auction rate money market preferred

             1,151     2,049     1,151  

Preferred stocks

             1,767     5,033     1,767  

Mortgage-backed securities

   47     24,291               47  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $98    $25,701    $2,918    $7,082    $3,016  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Number of securities in an unrealized loss position:

     6       6     12  
    

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and December 31, 2010, managementwe conducted an analysis to determine whether allany AFS securities currently in an unrealized loss position, including auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks, should be considered other-than-temporarily-impaired (“OTTI”).OTTI. Such analyses considered, among other factors, the following criteria:

 

Has the value of the investment declined more than what is deemed to be reasonable based on a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?

 

Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?

 

Is it probable that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount when due?

Is it more likely than not that the Corporationwe will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis?

 

Has the duration of the investment been extended?

During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, we had one state issued student loan auction rate AFS investment security (which is included in states and political subdivisions) that was downgraded by Moody’s from A3 to Caa3. As a result of this downgrade, we engaged the services of an independent investment valuation firm to estimate the amount of credit losses (if any) related to this particular issue as of March 31, 2012. The evaluation calculated a range of estimated credit losses utilizing two different bifurcation methods: 1) Estimated Cash Flow Method and 2) Credit Yield Analysis Method. The two methods were then weighted, with a higher weighting applied to the Estimated Cash Flow Method, to determine the estimated credit related impairment. As a result of this analysis we recognized an OTTI of $282 in earnings in the first quarter of 2012.

A summary of key valuation assumptions used in the aforementioned analysis as of March 31, 2012, follows:

Discounted
Cash Flow Method

Ratings

Fitch

Not Rated

Moody’s

Caa3

S&P

A

Seniority

Senior

Discount rate

LIBOR + 5.64%

Credit Yield
Analysis Method

Credit discount rate

LIBOR + 4.00%

Average observed discounts based on closed transactions

17.06%

To test for additional impairment of this security as of December 31, 2011,2012, we obtained another investment valuation (from the Corporation held an auction rate money market preferred security and preferred stocks which continuedsame independent firm engaged to beperform the initial valuation as of March 31, 2012) as of December 31, 2012. Based on the results of this valuation, no additional OTTI was indicated.

A rollforward of credit related impairment recognized in an unrealized loss positionearnings on AFS securities was as a result of the securities’ interest rates, as they are currently lower than the offering rates offollows:

January 1, 2012

  $  

Additions to credit losses for which no previous OTTI was recognized

   282  
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

  $282  
  

 

 

 

There were no credit losses recognized in earnings on AFS securities with similar characteristics. Management has determined that any declines in the fair value of these securities are the result of changes in interest rates and not risks related to the underlying credit quality of the security. Additionally, none of these securities are deemed to be below investment grade, management does not intend to sell the securities in an unrealized loss position, and it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not have to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis. As a result, the Corporation has not recognized an other-than-temporary impairment related to these declines in fair value.during 2011.

Based on the Corporation’sour analysis using the above criteria, the fact that management haswe have asserted that it doeswe do not have the intent to sell these securities in an unrealized loss position, and our testing that it is more likely than not the Corporationunlikely that we will not have to sell the securities before recovery of their cost basis, management doeswe do not believe that the values of any suchother securities are other-than-temporarily impaired as of as of December 31, 20112012 or 2010.December 31, 2011.

NOTE 6 — LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (ALLL)

The Corporation grantsWe grant commercial, agricultural, residential real estate, and consumer loans to customers situated primarily in Clare, Gratiot, Isabella, Mecosta, Midland, Montcalm, and Saginaw counties in Michigan. The ability of the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, light manufacturing, retail, gaming and tourism, higher education, and general economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of the consumer and residential mortgagereal estate loans are secured by various items of property, while commercial and agricultural loans are secured primarily by real estate, business assets, and personal guarantees; a portion of loans are unsecured.

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold in its portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loans losses, and any deferred fees or costs. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component of interest income over the term of the loan using the level yield method.

The accrual of interest on agricultural, commercial and mortgage loans is typically discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans are typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

For loans that are placed on nonaccrual status or charged off, all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not collected, is reversed against interest income while interest accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected, is charged against the allowance for loan losses. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash basis, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status after six months of continuous performance. For impaired loans not classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount outstanding.

Commercial and agricultural loans include loans for commercial real estate, commercial operating loans, farmland and agricultural production, and statestates and political subdivisions. Repayment of these loans is often dependent upon the successful operation and management of a business; thus, these loans generally involve greater risk than other types of lending. The Corporation minimizes itsWe minimize our risk by limiting the amount of loans to any one borrower to $12,500. Borrowers with credit needs of more than $12,500 are serviced through the use of loan participations with other commercial banks. Commercial and agricultural real estate loans generally require

loan-to-value limits of less than 80%. or less. Depending upon the type of loan, past credit history, and current operating results, the Corporationwe may require the borrowerborrowers to pledge accounts receivable, inventory, and property and equipment. Personal guarantees are generally required from the owners of closely held corporations, partnerships, and sole proprietorships. In addition, the Corporation requireswe require annual financial statements, preparesprepare cash flow analyses, and reviewsreview credit reports as deemed necessary.

The Corporation offers

We offer adjustable rate mortgages, fixed rate balloon mortgages, construction loans, and fixed rate mortgage loans which typically have amortization periods up to a maximum of 30 years. Fixed rate loans with an amortization of greater than 15 years are generally sold upon origination to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.FHLMC. Fixed rate residential mortgagereal estate loans with an amortization of 15 years or less may be held in the Corporation’sour portfolio, held for future sale, or sold upon origination. Factors used in determining when to sell these mortgages include management’s judgment aboutWe consider the direction of interest rates, the Corporation’s need for fixed rate assetssensitivity of our balance sheet to changes in the management of its interest rate sensitivity,rates, and overall loan demand.demand to determine whether or not to sell these loans to FHLMC.

LendingOur lending policies generally limit the maximum loan-to-value ratio on residential mortgagesreal estate loans to 95% of the lower of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price, with the condition that private mortgage insurance is required on loans with loan to value ratios in excess of 80%. Substantially all loans upon origination have a loan to value ratio of less than 80%. Underwriting criteria for residential real estate loans include: evaluation of the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments, the value of the property securing the loan, ensuring the payment of principal, interest, taxes, and hazard insurance does not exceed 28% of a borrower’s gross income, all debt servicing does not exceed 36% of income, acceptable credit reports, verification of employment, income, and financial information. Appraisals are performed by independent appraisers and reviewed internally. All mortgage loan requests are reviewed by aour mortgage loan committee or through a secondary market automated underwriting system; loans in excess of $400 require the approval of the Bank’sour Internal Loan Committee, the Board of Directors,Directors’ Loan Committee, or the Board of Director’s Loan Committee.Directors.

Consumer loans include automobile loans, secured and unsecured personal loans, and overdraft protection related loans. Loans are amortized generally for a period of up to 6 years. The underwriting emphasis is on a borrower’s perceived intent and ability to pay rather than collateral value. No consumer loans are sold to the secondary market.

The ALLL is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the ALLL when management believeswe believe the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.ALLL.

The ALLL is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’sa periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

The primary factors behind the determination of the level of the ALLL are specific allocations for impaired loans, historical loss percentages, as well as unallocated components. Specific allocations for impaired loans are primarily determined based on the difference between the net realizable value of the loan’s underlying collateral or the net present value of the projected payment stream and itsour recorded investment. Historical loss allocations arewere calculated at the loan class and segment levels based on a migration analysis of the loan portfolio over the preceding threefour years. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that management believeswe believe affect itsour estimate of probable losses based on qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

Allowance for Loan Losses

A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses (ALLL)ALLL and the recorded investment in loans by segments follows:

 

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans 
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
   Commercial  Agricultural  Residential
Real
Estate
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total 

Allowance for loan losses

       

January 1, 2011

  $6,048   $1,033   $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  

Loans charged off

   (1,863  (121  (2,240  (552      (4,776

Recoveries

   460    1    177    314        952  

Provision for loan losses

   1,639    90    1,845    266    (14  3,826  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

  $6,284   $1,003   $2,980   $633   $1,475   $12,375  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2011

       

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $2,152   $822   $1,146   $   $   $4,120  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   4,132    181    1,834    633    1,475    8,255  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $6,284   $1,003   $2,980   $633   $1,475   $12,375  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans as of December 31, 2011

       

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $14,097   $3,384   $7,664   $105    $25,250  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   351,617    71,261    270,696    31,467     725,041  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $365,714   $74,645   $278,360   $31,572    $750,291  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans

 
Year Ended December 31, 2010 
   Commercial  Agricultural   Residential
Real Estate
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total 

Allowance for loan losses

        

January 1, 2010

  $5,531   $731    $3,590   $626   $2,501   $12,979  

Loans charged off

   (3,731       (2,524  (596      (6,851

Recoveries

   452    1     638    297        1,388  

Provision for loan losses

   3,796    301     1,494    278    (1,012  4,857  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

  $6,048   $1,033    $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2010

        

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $490   $558    $732   $   $   $1,780  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   5,558    475     2,466    605    1,489    10,593  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $6,048   $1,033    $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Loans as of December 31, 2010

        

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $4,939   $2,196    $4,865   $48    $12,048  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   343,913    69,250     279,164    30,929     723,256  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $348,852   $71,446    $284,029   $30,977    $735,304  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Following is a summary of changes in the ALLL for the year ended December 31, 2009:

Allowance for Loan Losses 
Year Ended December 31, 2012 
   Commercial  Agricultural  Residential
Real
Estate
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total 

January 1, 2012

  $6,284   $1,003   $2,980   $633   $1,475   $12,375  

Loans charged off

   (1,672      (1,142  (542      (3,356

Recoveries

   240        122    255        617  

Provision for loan losses

   2,010    (596  1,667    320    (1,101  2,300  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

  $6,862   $407   $3,627   $666   $374   $11,936  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2009

  $11,982  

Loans charged off

   (6,642

Recoveries

   1,546  

Provision for loan losses

   6,093  
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2009

  $12,979  
  

 

 

 
Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans 
As of December 31, 2012 
   Commercial   Agricultural   Residential
Real
Estate
   Consumer   Unallocated   Total 

ALLL

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $2,050    $91    $1,796    $    $    $3,937  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   4,812     316     1,831     666     374     7,999  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $6,862    $407    $3,627    $666    $374    $11,936  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $14,456    $723    $10,704    $75      $25,958  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   357,049     82,883     273,444     33,419       746,795  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

  $371,505    $83,606    $284,148    $33,494      $772,753  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses 
Year Ended December 31, 2011 
   Commercial  Agricultural  Residential
Real
Estate
  Consumer  Unallocated  Total 

January 1, 2011

  $6,048   $1,033   $3,198   $605   $1,489   $12,373  

Loans charged off

   (1,863  (121  (2,240  (552      (4,776

Recoveries

   460    1    177    314        952  

Provision for loan losses

   1,639    90    1,845    266    (14  3,826  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

  $6,284   $1,003   $2,980   $633   $1,475   $12,375  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Credit Quality Indicators

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 
   Commercial   Agricultural   Residential
Real
Estate
   Consumer   Unallocated   Total 

ALLL

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $2,152    $822    $1,146    $    $    $4,120  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   4,132     181     1,834     633     1,475     8,255  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $6,284    $1,003    $2,980    $633    $1,475    $12,375  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans

            

Individually evaluated for impairment

  $14,097    $3,384    $7,664    $105      $25,250  

Collectively evaluated for impairment

   351,617     71,261     270,696     31,467       725,041  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 

Total

  $365,714    $74,645    $278,360    $31,572      $750,291  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

 

The following table displays the credit quality indicators for commercial and agricultural credit exposures based on internally assigned credit ratings as of December 31:

 

  2011   2012 
  Commercial   Agricultural   Commercial   Agricultural 
  Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total 

Rating

                        

2 — High quality

  $11,113    $11,013    $22,126    $3,583    $1,390    $4,973    $25,209    $15,536    $40,745    $2,955    $2,313    $5,268  

3 — High satisfactory

   90,064     29,972     120,036     11,154     5,186     16,340     83,805     28,974     112,779     16,972     11,886     28,858  

4 — Low satisfactory

   118,611     57,572     176,183     24,253     15,750     40,003     127,423     45,143     172,566     27,291     15,437     42,728  

5 — Special mention

   15,482     4,200     19,682     3,863     2,907     6,770     16,046     1,692     17,738     1,008     3,191     4,199  

6 — Substandard

   19,017     4,819     23,836     1,640     4,314     5,954     20,029     2,224     22,253     1,167     1,217     2,384  

7 — Vulnerable

   187          187                    1,512     2,294     3,806                 

8 — Doubtful

   3,621     43     3,664     190     415     605     1,596     22     1,618          169     169  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $258,095    $107,619    $365,714    $44,683    $29,962    $74,645    $275,620    $95,885    $371,505    $49,393    $34,213    $83,606  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

  2010   2011 
  Commercial   Agricultural   Commercial   Agricultural 
  Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total   Real Estate   Other   Total 

Rating

                        

2 — High quality

  $10,995    $13,525    $24,520    $3,792    $1,134    $4,926    $11,113    $11,013    $22,126    $3,583    $1,390    $4,973  

3 — High satisfactory

   74,912     30,322     105,234     11,247     3,235     14,482     90,064     29,972     120,036     11,154     5,186     16,340  

4 — Low satisfactory

   119,912     57,403     177,315     22,384     14,862     37,246     118,611     57,572     176,183     24,253     15,750     40,003  

5 — Special mention

   19,560     6,507     26,067     4,169     3,356     7,525     15,482     4,200     19,682     3,863     2,907     6,770  

6 — Substandard

   10,234     1,104     11,338     2,654     4,613     7,267     19,017     4,819     23,836     1,640     4,314     5,954  

7 — Vulnerable

   3,339     54     3,393                    187          187                 

8 — Doubtful

   858     127     985                    3,621     43     3,664     190     415     605  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $239,810    $109,042    $348,852    $44,246    $27,200    $71,446    $258,095    $107,619    $365,714    $44,683    $29,962    $74,645  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Internally assigned risk ratings are reviewed, at a minimum, when loans are renewed or when management has knowledge of improvements or deterioration of the credit quality of individual credits. Descriptions of the internally assigned risk ratings for commercial and agricultural loans are as follows:

1.    EXCELLENT — Substantially Risk Free

Credit has strong financial condition and solid earnings history, characterized by:

 

High liquidity, strong cash flow, low leverage.

 

Unquestioned ability to meet all obligations when due.

 

Experienced management, with management succession in place.

 

Secured by cash.

2.HIGH QUALITY — Limited Risk

Credit with sound financial condition and has a positive trend in earnings supplemented by:

 

Favorable liquidity and leverage ratios.

 

Ability to meet all obligations when due.

Management with successful track record.

 

Steady and satisfactory earnings history.

 

If loan is secured, collateral is of high quality and readily marketable.

 

Access to alternative financing.

 

Well defined primary and secondary source of repayment.

 

If supported by guaranty, the financial strength and liquidity of the guarantor(s) are clearly evident.

3.    HIGH SATISFACTORY — Reasonable Risk

Credit with satisfactory financial condition and further characterized by:

 

Working capital adequate to support operations.

 

Cash flow sufficient to pay debts as scheduled.

 

Management experience and depth appear favorable.

 

Loan performing according to terms.

 

If loan is secured, collateral is acceptable and loan is fully protected.

4.    LOW SATISFACTORY — Acceptable Risk

Credit with bankable risks, although some signs of weaknesses are shown:

 

Would include most start-up businesses.

 

Occasional instances of trade slowness or repayment delinquency — may have been 10-30 days slow within the past year.

 

Management’s abilities are apparent, yet unproven.

 

Weakness in primary source of repayment with adequate secondary source of repayment.

 

Loan structure generally in accordance with policy.

If secured, loan collateral coverage is marginal.

 

Adequate cash flow to service debt, but coverage is low.

To be classified as less than satisfactory, only one of the following criteria must be met.

5.    SPECIAL MENTION — Criticized

Credit constitutes an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of the circumstances surrounding a specific loan:

 

Downward trend in sales, profit levels, and margins.

 

Impaired working capital position.

 

Cash flow is strained in order to meet debt repayment.

 

Loan delinquency (30-60 days) and overdrafts may occur.

Shrinking equity cushion.

 

Diminishing primary source of repayment and questionable secondary source.

 

Management abilities are questionable.

 

Weak industry conditions.

 

Litigation pending against the borrower.

 

Collateral /or guaranty offers limited protection.

 

Negative debt service coverage, however the credit is well collateralized and payments are current.

6.    SUBSTANDARD — Classified

Credit where the borrower’s current net worth, paying capacity, and value of the collateral pledged is inadequate. There is a distinct possibility that the Corporationwe will implement collection procedures if the loan deficiencies are not corrected. In addition, the following characteristics may apply:

 

Sustained losses have severely eroded the equity and cash flow.

 

Deteriorating liquidity.

 

Serious management problems or internal fraud.

 

Original repayment terms liberalized.

 

Likelihood of bankruptcy.

 

Inability to access other funding sources.

 

Reliance on secondary source of repayment.

 

Litigation filed against borrower.

 

Collateral provides little or no value.

 

Requires excessive attention of the loan officer.

 

Borrower is uncooperative with loan officer.

7.    VULNERABLE — Classified

Credit is considered “Substandard” and warrants placing on nonaccrual. Risk of loss is being evaluated and exit strategy options are under review. Other characteristics that may apply:

 

Insufficient cash flow to service debt.

 

Minimal or no payments being received.

 

Limited options available to avoid the collection process.

 

Transition status, expect action will take place to collect loan without immediate progress being made.

8.    DOUBTFUL — Workout

Credit has all the weaknesses inherent in a “Substandard” loan with the added characteristic that collection and/or liquidation is pending. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but its classification as a loss is deferred until liquidation procedures are completed, or reasonably estimable. Other characteristics that may apply:

 

Normal operations are severely diminished or have ceased.

 

Seriously impaired cash flow.

 

Original repayment terms materially altered.

 

Secondary source of repayment is inadequate.

Survivability as a “going concern” is impossible.

 

Collection process has begun.

Bankruptcy petition has been filed.

 

Judgments have been filed.

 

Portion of the loan balance has been charged-off.

9.    LOSS — Charge off

Credits are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification is for charged off loans but does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value. These loans are further characterized by:

 

Liquidation or reorganization under bankruptcy, with poor prospects of collection.

 

Fraudulently overstated assets and/or earnings.

 

Collateral has marginal or no value.

 

Debtor cannot be located.

 

Over 120 days delinquent.

The Corporation’s

Our primary credit quality indicators for residential real estate and consumer loans is the individual loan’s past due aging. The following tables summarize the Corporation’sour past due and current loans as of December 31:

 

  2011 
  Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Nonaccrual   Total
Past Due
and
Nonaccrual
   Current   Total 
   2012 
30-89   90 Days    Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
 Nonaccrual  Total
Past Due
and
Nonaccrual
  Current  Total 
Days   or More    30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or  More
 

Commercial

                   

Commercial real estate

  $1,721    $364    $4,176    $6,261    $251,834    $258,095   $1,304   $161   $63   $2,544   $4,072   $271,548   $275,620  

Commercial other

   426     3     25     454     107,165     107,619    606        40    2,294    2,940    92,945    95,885  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total commercial

   2,147     367     4,201     6,715     358,999     365,714    1,910    161    103    4,838    7,012    364,493    371,505  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Agricultural

                   

Agricultural real estate

        99     189     288     44,395     44,683                        49,393    49,393  

Agricultural other

   2          415     417     29,545     29,962    90            169    259    33,954    34,213  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total agricultural

   2     99     604     705     73,940     74,645    90            169    259    83,347    83,606  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Residential mortgage

            

Residential real estate

       

Senior liens

   3,004     124     1,292     4,420     213,181     217,601    2,000    346    320    2,064    4,730    223,532    228,262  

Junior liens

   235     40     94     369     20,877     21,246    232            50    282    16,207    16,489  

Home equity lines of credit

   185     125     198     508     39,005     39,513    237            182    419    38,978    39,397  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total residential mortgage

   3,424     289     1,584     5,297     273,063     278,360  

Total residential real estate

  2,469    346    320    2,296    5,431    278,717    284,148  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consumer

                   

Secured

   158     5          163     26,011     26,174    127    33    4        164    28,118    28,282  

Unsecured

   23               23     5,375     5,398    31    3    1        35    5,177    5,212  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total consumer

   181     5          186     31,386     31,572    158    36    5        199    33,295    33,494  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $5,754    $760    $6,389    $12,903    $737,388    $750,291   $4,627   $543   $428   $7,303   $12,901   $759,852   $772,753  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

  2010 
  Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
   Nonaccrual   Total
Past Due
and
Nonaccrual
   Current   Total 
   2011 
30-89   90 Days    Accruing Interest
and Past Due:
 Nonaccrual  Total
Past Due
and
Nonaccrual
  Current  Total 
Days   or More    30-59
Days
 60-89
Days
 90 Days
or More
 

Commercial

                   

Commercial real estate

  $4,814    $125    $4,001    $8,940    $230,870    $239,810   $1,721   $   $364   $4,176   $6,261   $251,834   $258,095  

Commercial other

   381          139     520     108,522     109,042    388    38    3    25    454    107,165    107,619  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total commercial

   5,195     125     4,140     9,460     339,392     348,852    2,109    38    367    4,201    6,715    358,999    365,714  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Agricultural

                   

Agricultural real estate

   92               92     44,154     44,246            99    189    288    44,395    44,683  

Agricultural other

   4     50          54     27,146     27,200        2        415    417    29,545    29,962  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total agricultural

   96     50          146     71,300     71,446        2    99    604    705    73,940    74,645  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Residential mortgage

            

Residential real estate

       

Senior liens

   5,265     310     1,421     6,996     213,003     219,999    2,668    336    124    1,292    4,420    213,181    217,601  

Junior liens

   476          49     525     26,187     26,712    203    32    40    94    369    20,877    21,246  

Home equity lines of credit

   598               598     36,720     37,318    185        125    198    508    39,005    39,513  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total residential mortgage

   6,339     310     1,470     8,119     275,910     284,029  

Total residential real estate

  3,056    368    289    1,584    5,297    273,063    278,360  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Consumer

                   

Secured

   298               298     24,781     25,079    127    31    5        163    26,011    26,174  

Unsecured

   10     1          11     5,887     5,898    20    3            23    5,375    5,398  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total consumer

   308     1          309     30,668     30,977    147    34    5        186    31,386    31,572  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $11,938    $486    $5,610    $18,034    $717,270    $735,304   $5,312   $442   $760   $6,389   $12,903   $737,388   $750,291  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

December 31, 2009

  $10,305    $768    $8,522    $19,595    $703,721    $723,316  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Impaired Loans

As a result of adopting the amendments in ASU No. 2011-02, the Corporation reassessed all loan restructurings that occurred on or after January 1, 2011 for identification as troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s). The Corporation identified as TDR’s certain loans for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance for loan losses methodology. Upon identifying those loans as TDR’s, the Corporation classified them as impaired. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-02 require retrospective application of the impairment measurement guidance for those loans newly identified as impaired during the period. The Corporation’s recorded investment in loans for which the allowance for credit losses was previously measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology and are now impaired was $5,136, with a specific valuation allowance of $1,022 as of December 31, 2011.

Loans may be classified as impaired if they meet one or more of the following criteria:

1.   There has been a chargeoffcharge-off of its principal balance (in whole or in part);

2.   The loan has been classified as a TDR; or

3.   The loan is in nonaccrual status.

Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial, commercial real estate loans, agricultural, or agricultural mortgage loans by eithercomparing the loan’s outstanding balance to the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, if the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.

Interest income is recognized on impaired loans in nonaccrual status on the cash basis, but only after all principal has been collected. For impaired loans not in nonaccrual status, interest income is recognized daily as earned according to the terms of the loan agreement.

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of and for the year ended December 31:

 

  2011   2011 Year to Date   2012 
  Outstanding
Balance
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Valuation
Allowance
   Average
Outstanding
Balance
   Interest
Income
Recognized
   Outstanding
Balance
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Valuation
Allowance
   Average
Outstanding
Balance
   Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

                    

Commercial real estate

  $5,014    $5,142    $1,881    $4,012    $247    $7,295    $7,536    $1,653    $6,155    $237  

Commercial other

   734     734     271     376     25     2,140     2,140     397     1,437     93  

Agricultural real estate

                  9          91     91     32     413       

Agricultural other

   2,689     2,689     822     2,443     138     420     420     59     1,555     54  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   7,269     8,825     1,111     5,781     331  

Residential mortgage junior liens

   195     260     35     184     11  

Residential real estate senior liens

   10,450     11,654     1,783     8,860     405  

Residential real estate junior liens

   72     118     13     134     6  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance

   15,901     17,650     4,120     12,805     752     20,468     21,959     3,937     18,554     795  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

                    

Commercial real estate

   7,984     10,570       4,863     375     3,749     4,408       5,867     321  

Commercial other

   365     460       267     10     1,272     1,433       819     87  

Agricultural real estate

   190     190       180                      183       

Agricultural other

   505     625       253     18     212     332       201     4  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   2     2       202       

Residential real estate senior liens

        18       1     1  

Home equity lines of credit

   198     498       99     12     182     482       190     16  

Consumer secured

   105     114       77     4     75     84       90     6  
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance

   9,349     12,459       5,941     419     5,490     6,757       7,351     435  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Impaired loans

                    

Commercial

   14,097     16,906     2,152     9,518     657     14,456     15,517     2,050     14,278     738  

Agricultural

   3,384     3,504     822     2,885     156     723     843     91     2,352     58  

Residential mortgage

   7,664     9,585     1,146     6,266     354  

Residential real estate

   10,704     12,272     1,796     9,185     428  

Consumer

   105     114          77     4     75     84          90     6  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $25,250    $30,109    $4,120    $18,746    $1,171    $25,958    $28,716    $3,937    $25,905    $1,230  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

  2010   2010 Year to Date   2011 
  Outstanding
Balance
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Valuation
Allowance
   Average
Outstanding
Balance
   Interest
Income
Recognized
   Outstanding
Balance
   Unpaid
Principal
Balance
   Valuation
Allowance
   Average
Outstanding
Balance
   Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

                    

Commercial real estate

  $3,010    $4,110    $472    $2,482    $90    $5,014    $5,142    $1,881    $4,012    $247  

Commercial other

   18     18     18     259     1     734     734     271     376     25  

Agricultural real estate

                  9       

Agricultural other

   2,196     2,196     558     1,098     143     2,689     2,689     822     2,443     138  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   4,292     5,236     698     5,045     187     7,269     8,825     1,111     5,781     331  

Residential mortgage junior liens

   172     250     34     205     7     195     260     35     184     11  

Consumer

                  12       
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans with a valuation allowance

   9,688     11,810     1,780     9,101     428     15,901     17,650     4,120     12,805     752  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

                    

Commercial real estate

   1,742     2,669       2,738     147     7,984     10,570       4,863     375  

Commercial other

   169     269       145     20     365     460       267     10  

Agricultural real estate

               106          190     190       180       

Agricultural other

   505     625       253     18  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   401     501       201     26     2     2       202       

Home equity lines of credit

               8          198     498       99     12  

Consumer secured

   48     85       55     5     105     114       77     4  
  

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

     

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans without a valuation allowance

   2,360     3,524       3,253     198     9,349     12,459       5,941     419  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Impaired loans

                    

Commercial

   4,939     7,066     490     5,624     258     14,097     16,906     2,152     9,518     657  

Agricultural

   2,196     2,196     558     1,204     143     3,384     3,504     822     2,885     156  

Residential mortgage

   4,865     5,987     732     5,459     220     7,664     9,585     1,146     6,266     354  

Consumer

   48     85          67     5     105     114          77     4  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $12,048    $15,334    $1,780    $12,354    $626    $25,250    $30,109    $4,120    $18,746    $1,171  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

   2009 

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance

  $3,757  

Impaired loans without a valuation allowance

   8,897  
  

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $12,654  
  

 

 

 

Valuation allowance related to impaired loans

  $612  

Year to date average outstanding balance of impaired loans

  $13,249  

Year to date interest income recognized on impared loans

  $340  

The CorporationAs of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had committed to advance $9 and $243, respectively, in connection with impaired loans, which include TDR’s, as of December 31, 2011. No additional funds were committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans, as of December 31, 2010.TDR’s.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

Loan modifications are considered to be TDR’s when the modification includes terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.

Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:

1.     Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates for debt with similar risk characteristics.

2.     Extending the amortization period beyond typical lending guidelines for debt with similar risk characteristics.

3.     Forbearance of principal.

4.     Forbearance of accrued interest.

To determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, the Corporation considerswe consider if:

1.   The borrower is currently in default on any of their debt.

2.   ��It is likely that theThe borrower would likely default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.

3.   The borrower’s cash flow was sufficientinsufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.

4.   The borrower has declared, or is in the process of declaring, bankruptcy.

5.   The borrower is unlikely to continue as a going concern (if the entity is a business).

The following is a summary of information pertaining to TDR’s during 2011:granted in the years ended December 31:

 

  2012   2011 
  Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Post-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Post-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Post-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

                  

Commercial real estate

   1    $408    $408     1    $912    $792     1    $408    $408  

Commercial other

   42     12,575     12,132     28     6,437     6,437     42     12,575     12,132  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total commercial

   43     12,983     12,540     29     7,349     7,229     43     12,983     12,540  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Agricultural other

   8     1,321     1,321     7     652     652     8     1,321     1,321  

Residential mortgage senior liens

   36     3,915     3,865  

Residential real estate Senior liens

   29     3,463     3,463     36     3,915     3,865  

Junior liens

   1     22     22                 
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total residential real estate

   30     3,485     3,485     36     3,915     3,865  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Consumer

                  

Secured

   7     69     69     1               7     69     69  

Unsecured

   2     20     20                    2     20     20  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total consumer

   9     89     89     1     ��         9     89     89  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $96    $18,308    $17,815     67    $11,486    $11,366     96    $18,308    $17,815  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following tables summarize concessions we granted by the Corporation to borrowers in financial difficultiesdifficulty during 2012:

   Below Market
Interest Rate
   Extension of
Amortization Period
   Below Market
Interest Rate and
Extension of
Amortization Period
 
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

            

Commercial real estate

       $         $     1    $912  

Commercial other

   25     4,924     1     1,368     2     145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   25     4,924     1     1,368     3     1,057  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural other

   6     561     1     91            

Residential real estate Senior liens

   17     1,779     3     521     9     1,163  

Junior liens

                       1     22  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total residential real estate

   17     1,779     3     521     10     1,185  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consumer secured

   1                           
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   49    $7,264     5    $1,980     13    $2,242  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following tables summarize concessions we granted to borrowers in financial difficulty during 2011:

 

  Below Market
Interest Rate
   Below Market
Interest Rate and
Extension of
Amortization Period
   Below Market
Interest Rate
   Extension of
Amortization Period
   Below Market
Interest Rate and
Extension of
Amortization Period
 
  Number of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of

Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

                    

Commercial real estate

   1    $408         $     1    $408         $         $  

Commercial other

   38     9,932     4     2,643     38     9,932               4     2,643  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total commercial

   39     10,340     4     2,643     39     10,340               4     2,643  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Agricultural other

   8     1,321               8     1,321                      

Residential mortgage Senior liens

   19     2,161     17     1,754  

Residential real estate Senior liens

   19     2,161               17     1,754  

Consumer

                    

Secured

   6     65     1     4     6     65               1     4  

Unsecured

             2     20                         2     20  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total consumer

   6     65     3     24     6     65               3     24  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   72    $13,887     24    $4,421     72    $13,887         $     24    $4,421  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The CorporationWe did not restructure any loans through the forbearance of principal or accrued interest during 2012 and 2011.

Based on the Corporation’sour historical loss experience, losses associated with TDR’s are not significantly different than other impaired loans within the same loan segment. As such, TDR’s, including TDR’s that have been modified in the past 12 months that subsequently defaulted, are analyzed in the same manner as other impaired loans within their respective loan segment. The Corporation

Following is a summary of loans that defaulted during 2012, which were modified within 12 months prior to the default date:

   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Default
Recorded
Investment
   Charge-Off
Recorded
Upon
Default
   Post-
Default
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial other

   5    $342    $143    $199  

Residential real estate senior liens

   1     47     43     4  

Consumer secured

   1     8     8       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   7    $397    $194    $203  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

We had no loans that defaulted during 2011, which were modified as troubled debt restructurings since January 1, 2010 that subsequently defaulted.within 12 months prior to the default date.

The following is a summary of TDR loan balances as of December 31:

 

   2011   2010   2009 

Troubled debt restructurings

  $18,756    $5,763    $4,977  
   2012   2011 

Troubled debt restructurings

  $19,355    $18,756  

NOTE 7 — PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:

 

  2011   2010   2012   2011 

Land

  $5,174    $4,694    $5,435    $5,174  

Buildings and improvements

   22,397     21,502     22,705     22,397  

Furniture and equipment

   26,926     25,822     29,755     26,926  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

   54,497     52,018     57,895     54,497  

Less: accumulated depreciation

   29,871     27,391     32,108     29,871  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Premises and equipment, net

  $24,626    $24,627    $25,787    $24,626  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Depreciation expense amounted to $2,417, $2,521 and $2,522 in 2012, 2011, and $2,349 in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

NOTE 8 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The carrying amount of goodwill was $45,618 at December 31, 20112012 and 2010.2011.

Identifiable intangible assets at year end were as follows:

 

   2011 
   Gross
Intangible
Assets
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Intangible
Assets
 

Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions

  $5,373    $4,199    $1,174  
   2012 
   Gross
Intangible
Assets
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Intangible
Assets
 

Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions

  $5,373    $4,459    $914  

 

   2010 
   Gross
Intangible
Assets
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Intangible
Assets
 

Core deposit premium resultingfrom acquisitions

  $5,373    $3,900    $1,473  
   2011 
   Gross
Intangible
Assets
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Intangible
Assets
 

Core deposit premium resulting from acquisitions

  $5,373    $4,199    $1,174  

Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible assets was $260, $299, and $338 in 2012, 2011, and $375 in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable intangibles for each of the next five years succeeding December 31, 2011,2012, and thereafter is as follows:

 

Year

  Amount   Amount 

2012

  $260  

2013

   221    $221  

2014

   183     183  

2015

   145     145  

2016

   106     106  

2017

   74  

Thereafter

   259     185  
  

 

   

 

 
  $1,174    $914  
  

 

   

 

 

NOTE 9 — DEPOSITS

Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years, and thereafter, are as follows:

 

Year

  Amount   Amount 

2012

  $265,299  

2013

   63,290    $205,754  

2014

   46,802     76,742  

2015

   55,493     71,685  

2016

   43,601     51,232  

2017

   40,523  

Thereafter

   7,052     18,399  
  

 

   

 

 
  $481,537    $464,335  
  

 

   

 

 

Interest expense on time deposits greater than $100 was $3,854 in 2012, $4,302 in 2011, and $4,427 in 2010, and $5,246 in 2009.2010.

NOTE 10 — BORROWED FUNDS

Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December 31:

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  Amount   Rate Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate Amount   Rate 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64

FHLB advances

  $152,000     2.05 $142,242     3.16

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates

   57,198     0.25  45,871     0.25   66,147     0.15  57,198     0.25

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates

   16,696     3.51  19,623     3.28   16,284     3.57  16,696     3.51

Federal funds purchased

            16,000     0.60   6,570     0.50         
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $216,136     2.42 $194,917     2.56  $241,001     1.59 $216,136     2.42
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

The Federal Home Loan BankFHLB borrowings are collateralized by U.S. government and federal agency securities and a blanket lien on all qualified 1-to-4 family mortgage loans. Advances are also secured by FHLB stock owned by the Corporation. The Corporationthat we own. As of December 31, 2012, we had the ability to borrow up to an additional $110,069, based on the assets currently pledged as collateral.total unused lines of credit of $108,646.

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of FHLB advances are as follows as of December 31:

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  Amount   Rate Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate Amount   Rate 

Fixed rate advances due 2011

  $        $10,086     3.96

One year putable advances due 2011

            1,000     4.75

Fixed rate advances due 2012

   17,000     2.97  17,000     2.97  $        $17,000     2.97

One year putable advances due 2012

   15,000     4.10  15,000     4.10

One year putable fixed rate advances due 2012

            15,000     4.10

Fixed rate advances due 2013

   5,242     4.14  5,337     4.14            5,242     4.14

One year putable advances due 2013

   5,000     3.15  5,000     3.15

One year putable fixed rate advances due 2013

            5,000     3.15

Fixed rate advances due 2014

   25,000     3.16  25,000     3.16   10,000     0.48  25,000     3.16

Fixed rate advances due 2015

   45,000     3.30  25,000     4.63   42,000     1.12  45,000     3.30

Fixed rate advances due 2016

   10,000     2.15            10,000     2.15  10,000     2.15

Fixed rate advances due 2017

   20,000     2.56  10,000     2.35   40,000     2.15  20,000     2.56

Fixed rate advances due 2018

   20,000     2.86         

Fixed rate advances due 2019

   20,000     3.73         

Fixed rate advances due 2020

   10,000     1.98         
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64  $152,000     2.05 $142,242     3.16
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as secured borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. The securities underlying the agreements havehad a fair value of $99,869$143,322 and $86,381$99,869 at December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively. Such securities remain under the control of the Corporation. The Corporationour control. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of underlying securities.

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates are as follows at December 31:

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  Amount   Rate Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate Amount   Rate 

Repurchase agreements due 2011

  $        $858     1.51

Repurchase agreements due 2012

   428     2.08  1,013     2.21  $        $428     2.08

Repurchase agreements due 2013

   5,000     4.51  5,127     4.45   5,000     4.51  5,000     4.51

Repurchase agreements due 2014

   10,869     3.12  12,087     3.00   10,872     3.15  10,869     3.12

Repurchase agreements due 2015

   399     3.25  538     3.25   412     3.25  399     3.25
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $16,696     3.51 $19,623     3.28  $16,284     3.57 $16,696     3.51
  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

 

Securities sold under repurchase agreements without stated maturity dates, federal funds purchased, and Federal Reserve BankFRB discount window advances generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. The following table provides a summary of short term borrowings for the years ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 
  Maximum
Month-End
Balance
   YTD
Average
Balance
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Period
 Maximum
Month-End
Balance
   YTD
Average
Balance
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Period
   Maximum
Month  End
Balance
   YTD
Average
Balance
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Period
 Maximum
Month End
Balance
   YTD
Average
Balance
   Weighted Average
Interest Rate
During the Period
 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates

  $57,198    $45,397     0.25 $56,410    $44,974     0.28  $66,147    $57,466     0.20 $57,198    $45,397     0.25

Federal funds purchased

   18,300     3,467     0.51  16,000     333     0.60   17,900     3,386     0.47  18,300     3,467     0.51

Federal Reserve Bank discount window advance

                 7,500     103     0.75

The Corporation

We had pledged certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, available-for-saleAFS securities, and 1-4 family mortgage loans in the following amounts at December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2012   2011 

Pledged to secure borrowed funds

  $292,092    $297,297    $308,628    $292,092  

Pledged to secure repurchase agreements

   99,869     86,381     143,322     99,869  

Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or required by law

   26,761     14,626     22,955     26,761  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $418,722    $398,304    $474,905    $418,722  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The CorporationWe had no investment securities that are restricted to be pledged for specific purposes.

NOTE 11 — OTHER NONINTEREST EXPENSES

A summary of expenses included in Other Noninterest Expenses areother noninterest expenses is as follows for the yearyears ended December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Marketing and community relations

  $1,174    $1,093    $894    $1,965    $1,174    $1,093  

Directors fees

   842     887     923     885     842     887  

Audit and SOX compliance fees

   714     710     546  

Foreclosed asset and collection

   576     916     831  

FDIC insurance premiums

   864     1,086     1,254  

Audit fees

   711     714     710  

Education and travel

   526     499     395     588     526     499  

Consulting fees

   482     386     167  

Printing and supplies

   405     420     529     424     405     420  

Postage and freight

   388     395     472     389     388     395  

Consulting fees

   386     167     201  

Other losses

   300     54     72  

Legal fees

   302     382     415     268     302     382  

Amortization of deposit premium

   299     338     375     260     299     338  

Foreclosed asset and collection

   202     576     916  

State taxes

   187     57     51  

All other

   1,573     1,499     1,798     1,526     1,462     1,376  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total other

  $7,185    $7,306    $7,379    $9,051    $8,271    $8,560  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

NOTE 12 — FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

Components of the consolidated provision for federal income taxes are as follows for the year ended December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Currently payable

  $965    $1,425    $1,487    $1,747    $965    $1,425  

Deferred expense (benefit)

   389     179     (641

Deferred expense

   616     389     179  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income tax expense

  $1,354    $1,604    $846    $2,363    $1,354    $1,604  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The reconciliation of the provision for federal income taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate of 34% of income before federal income taxes is as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Income taxes at 34% statutory rate

  $3,932   $3,621   $2,940    $4,953   $3,932   $3,621  

Effect of nontaxable income

        

Interest income on tax exempt municipal bonds

   (1,687  (1,565  (1,680   (1,675  (1,687  (1,565

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance

   (207  (225  (218   (238  (207  (225

Other

   (65  (132  (249   (147  (65  (132
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total effect of nontaxable income

   (1,959  (1,922  (2,147   (2,060  (1,959  (1,922

Effect of tax credits

   (793  (263  (134   (667  (793  (263

Effect of nondeductible expenses

   174    168    187     137    174    168  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Income tax expense

  $1,354   $1,604   $846    $2,363   $1,354   $1,604  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Included in OCI are unrealized gains (losses) on auction rate money market preferred and preferred stocks. For federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered equity investments. As such, no deferred federal income taxes related to unrealized holding gains or losses are expected or recorded.

A summary of the components of unrealized holding gains on AFS securities included in OCI follows for the years ended December 31:

  2012  2011  2010 
  Auction
Rate
Money
Market
Preferred
and
Preferred
Stocks
  All
Other
AFS
Securities
  Total  Auction
Rate
Money
Market
Preferred

and
Preferred
Stocks
  All
Other
AFS
Securities
  Total  Auction
Rate
Money
Market
Preferred

and
Preferred
Stocks
  All
Other
AFS
Securities
  Total 

Unrealized gains arising during the year

 $2,059   $1,862   $3,921   $(1,719 $10,939   $9,220   $(226 $1,382   $1,156  

Reclassification adjustment for net realized gains included in net income

      (1,119  (1,119      (3  (3      (348  (348

Reclassification adjustment for impairment loss included in net income

      282    282                          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains

  2,059    1,025    3,084    (1,719  10,936    9,217    (226  1,034    808  

Tax effect

      (348  (348      (3,719  (3,719      (351  (351
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unrealized gains,net of tax

 $2,059   $677   $2,736   $(1,719 $7,217   $5,498   $(226 $683   $457  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for federal income tax purposes.

Significant components of the Corporation'sour deferred tax assets and liabilities, included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2012   2011 

Deferred tax assets

        

Allowance for loan losses

  $3,278    $3,270    $3,133    $3,278  

Deferred directors’ fees

   2,384     2,364     2,100     2,384  

Employee benefit plans

   158     122     189     158  

Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses

   800     694     892     800  

Net unrealized losses on trading securities

   364     400     351     364  

Net unrecognized actuarial loss on pension plan

   1,780     1,109     1,891     1,780  

Life insurance death benefit payable

   804     804     804     804  

Alternative minimum tax

   729     686     729     729  

Other

   260     219     195     260  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   10,557     9,668     10,284     10,557  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities

        

Prepaid pension cost

   851     851     1,021     851  

Premises and equipment

   992     902     724     992  

Accretion on securities

   34     36     37     34  

Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses

   1,102     1,000     1,203     1,102  

Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities

   4,564     847     4,912     4,564  

Other

   937     518     1,163     937  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   8,480     4,154     9,060     8,480  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

  $2,077    $5,514    $1,224    $2,077  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The Corporation and its subsidiariesWe are subject to U.S. federal income tax. The Corporation istax; however, we are no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2008.2009. There are no material uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Corporation’sour consolidated financial statements. The Corporation doesWe do not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in the next twelve months.

The Corporation recognizesWe recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Corporation doesWe do not have any amounts accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 and iswe not aware of any claims for such amounts by federal income tax authorities.

Included in other comprehensive income for 2011 and 2010 are the changes in unrealized losses of $1,719 and unrealized losses of $226, respectively, related to auction rate money market securities and preferred stock. For federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered equity investments for which no federal deferred income taxes are expected or recorded.

NOTE 13 — OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ACTIVITIES

Credit-Related Financial Instruments

The Corporation isWe are party to credit related financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are entered into in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of itsour customers. These financial instruments, which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, involve, to

varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate riskIRR in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Corporation haswe have in a particular class of financial instrument.

 

  Contract Amount   December 31 
  2011   2010   2012   2011 

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit

  $102,822    $110,201    $115,233    $102,822  

Commercial and standby letters of credit

   4,461     4,881     3,935     4,461  

Commitments to grant loans

   21,806     13,382     40,507     21,806  

Unfunded commitments under lines of credit are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These commitments may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional commitments we issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar transactions. These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit mature within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Corporation evaluatesWe evaluate each customer'scustomer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemedwe deem necessary by the Corporation upon the extension of credit, is based on management'sour credit evaluation of the borrower. While the Corporation considerswe consider standby letters of credit to be guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.

Commitments to grant loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemedwe deem necessary, by the Corporation, is based on management’sour credit evaluation of the customer. Commitments to grant loans include loans committed to be sold to the secondary market.

The Corporation’sOur exposure to credit-related loss in the event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit could be up to the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation usesWe use the same credit policies in deciding to make these commitments as it doeswe do for extending loans to customers. No significant losses are anticipated as a result of these commitments.

NOTE 14 — ON-BALANCE SHEET ACTIVITIES

Derivative Loan Commitments

Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding. The Corporation entersWe enter into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific times in the future, with the intention that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A mortgage loan commitment binds the Corporationus to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after inception of the rate lock.

Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose the Corporationus to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increases.increase. The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock commitments was $875$1,912 and $547$875 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Forward Loan Sale Commitments

To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan commitments, the Corporation utilizeswe utilize both “mandatory delivery” and “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the values of loan that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments.

With a “mandatory delivery” contract, the Corporation commitswe commit to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified date. If the Corporation failswe fail to deliver the amount of mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified date, it iswe are obligated to pay a “pair-off” fee, based on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the investor for the shortfall.

With a “best efforts” contract, the Corporation commitswe commit to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor

will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits to lend funds to a potential borrower).

The Corporation expects

We expect that these forward loan sale commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of derivative loan commitments. The notional amount of undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $4,080$5,545 and $1,729$4,080 at December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively.

The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by management and, accordingly, are not recorded in the accompanyingour consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 15 — COMMITMENTS AND OTHER MATTERS

Banking regulations require the Bankus to maintain cash reserve balances in currency or as deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank.FRB. At December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, the reserve balances amounted to $821$885 and $470,$821, respectively.

Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation. At December 31, 2011,2012, substantially all of the Bank’s assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the form of loans or advances. Consequently, bankBank dividends are the principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current yearsyear’s retained net income plus retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to common stock. At January 1, 2012,2013, the amount available to the Corporation for dividends from the Bank, without regulatory approval, was approximately $13,235.$17,000.

NOTE 16 — MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve BankFRB and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “Regulators”).FDIC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the RegulatorsFRB and the FDIC that if undertaken, could have a material effect on the Corporation's and Bank’sour financial statements. Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation and the Bankwe must meet specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, capital, and certain off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting standards. The Bank’sOur capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the RegulatorsFRB and the FDIC about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bankus to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management believes,We believe, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, that the Corporation and the Bankwe met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.requirements.

As of December 31, 2011,2012, the most recent notifications from the RegulatorsFRB and the FDIC categorized the Bankus as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the

following tables. There are no conditions or events since the notifications that management believeswe believe has changed the Bank’sour categories. The Corporation's and the Bank'sOur actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.

 

  Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum To Be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
  Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio 

December 31, 2012

          

Total capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

  $112,498     13.40 $67,150     8.00 $83,937     10.00

Consolidated

   123,388     14.48    68,161     8.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

   101,988     12.15    33,575     4.00    50,362     6.00  

Consolidated

   112,722     13.23    34,080     4.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to average assets

          

Isabella Bank

   101,988     7.57    53,916     4.00    67,395     5.00  

Consolidated

   112,722     8.29    54,411     4.00    N/A     N/A  
  Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum To Be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
   Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum To Be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
  Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio   Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio 

December 31, 2011

                    

Total capital to risk weighted assets

                    

Isabella Bank

  $104,542     13.06 $64,028     8.00 $80,035     10.00  $104,542     13.06 $64,028     8.00 $80,035     10.00

Consolidated

   115,172     14.17    65,009     8.00    N/A     N/A     115,172     14.17    65,009     8.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets

                    

Isabella Bank

   94,508     11.81    32,014     4.00    48,021     6.00     94,508     11.81    32,014     4.00    48,021     6.00  

Consolidated

   104,987     12.92    32,505     4.00    N/A     N/A     104,987     12.92    32,505     4.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to average assets

                    

Isabella Bank

   94,508     7.44    50,808     4.00    63,510     5.00     94,508     7.44    50,808     4.00    63,510     5.00  

Consolidated

   104,987     8.18    51,317     4.00    N/A     N/A     104,987     8.18    51,317     4.00    N/A     N/A  
  Actual Minimum
Capital
Requirement
 Minimum To Be
Well Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
 
  Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio Amount   Ratio 

December 31, 2010

          

Total capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

  $98,566     12.79 $61,642     8.00 $77,053     10.00

Consolidated

   108,978     13.97    62,423     8.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets

          

Isabella Bank

   88,901     11.54    30,821     4.00    46,232     6.00  

Consolidated

   99,192     12.71    31,212     4.00    N/A     N/A  

Tier 1 capital to average assets

          

Isabella Bank

   88,901     7.62    46,653     4.00    58,316     5.00  

Consolidated

   99,192     8.42    47,116     4.00    N/A     N/A  

NOTE 17 — BENEFIT PLANS

401(k) Plan

The Corporation hasWe have a 401(k) plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws. The Corporation makesWe made a 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an employee’s compensation contributed to the Plan during the year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment and are 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching contributions. For 2012, 2011 2010 and 2009,2010, expenses attributable to the Plan were $662, $652, and $625, and $617, respectively.

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The Corporation hasWe have a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan which was curtailed in 2007. Due to the curtailment, future salary increases will not be considered and the benefits are based on years of service and the employees'employees’ five highest consecutive years of compensation out of the last ten years of service rendered through March 1, 2007.

Changes in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net amount recognized on the Corporation'sour consolidated balance sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31, are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 

Change in benefit obligation

      

Benefit obligation, January 1

  $9,660   $8,897    $11,334   $9,660  

Interest cost

   507    531     470    507  

Actuarial loss

   1,750    679     888    1,750  

Benefits paid, including plan expenses

   (583  (447   (483  (583
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Benefit obligation, December 31

   11,334    9,660     12,209    11,334  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Change in plan assets

      

Fair value of plan assets, January 1

   8,900    8,355     8,603    8,900  

Investment return

   148    945     778    148  

Contributions

   138    47     752    138  

Benefits paid, including plan expenses

   (583  (447   (483  (583
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, December 31

   8,603    8,900     9,650    8,603  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Deficiency in funded status at December 31, included on the consolidated balance sheets in accrued interest payable and other liabilities

  $(2,731 $(760  $(2,559 $(2,731
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 

Change in accrued pension benefit costs

      

Accrued benefit cost at January 1

  $(760 $(542  $(2,731 $(760

Contributions

   138    47     752    138  

Net periodic cost for the year

   (138  (193   (251  (138

Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost

   (1,971  (72   (329  (1,971
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Accrued pension benefit cost at December 31

  $(2,731 $(760  $(2,559 $(2,731
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Amounts recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) consist of the following amounts during the years ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Change in unrecognized pension cost

  $(1,971 $(72 $374    $(329 $(1,971 $(72

Tax effect

   671    25    (127   111    671    25  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net

  $(1,300 $(47 $247    $(218 $(1,300 $(47
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

The accumulated benefit obligation was $11,334$12,209 and $9,660$11,334 at December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively.

The Company hasWe have recorded the funded status of the Plan in itsour consolidated balance sheets. The Company adjustsWe adjust the underfunded status in a liability account to reflect the current funded status of the plan. Any gains or

losses that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost will be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). The components of net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Net periodic benefit cost

    

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

  $507   $531   $504    $470   $507   $531  

Expected return on plan assets

   (522  (491  (524   (511  (522  (491

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss

   153    153    169     292    153    153  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $138   $193   $149  

Total

  $251   $138   $193  
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) at December 31, 20112012 includes net unrecognized actuarial lossespension costs before income taxes of $5,233,$5,562, of which $253$208 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2012.2013.

The actuarial assumptions used in determining the projected benefit obligation are as follows for the year ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Discount rate

   4.22  5.36  5.87   3.75  4.22  5.36

Expected long-term rate of return

   6.00  6.00  6.00   6.00  6.00  6.00

The actuarial weighted average assumptions used in determining the net periodic pension costs are as follows for the year ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 

Discount rate

   5.36  6.10  5.87   4.22  5.36  6.10

Expected long-term return on plan assets

   6.00  6.00  6.00   6.00  6.00  6.00

As a result of the curtailment of the Plan, there is no rate of compensation increase considered in the above assumptions.

The expected long term rate of return is an estimate of anticipated future long term rates of return on plan assets as measured on a market value basis. Factors considered in arriving at this assumption include:

 

Historical longerlong term rates of return for broad asset classes.

 

Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.

 

The general mix of assets held by the plan.

 

The stated investment policy for the plan.

The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment related expenses.

Plan Assets

The Corporation’sOur overall investment strategy is to moderately grow the portfolio by investing 50% of the portfolio in equity securities and 50% in fixed income securities. This strategy is designed to generate a long term rate of return of 6.0%. Equity securities primarily consist of the S&P 500 Index with a smaller allocation to the Small Cap and International Index. Fixed income securities are invested in the Bond Market Index. The Plan has appropriate assets invested in short term investments to meet near-term benefit payments.

The asset mix and the sector weighting of the investments are determined by theour pension committee, which is comprised of members of management ofour management. To manage the Corporation. Consultations are held withPlan, we retain a third party investment advisor retained by the Corporation to manage the Plan. The Corporation reviewsconduct consultations. We review the performance of the advisor no less than annually.

The fair values of the Corporation’sour pension plan assets by asset category were as follows as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2012   2011 

Description

  Total   (Level 2)   Total   (Level 2)   Total   (Level 2)   Total   (Level 2) 

Asset Category

                

Short-term investments

  $16    $16    $108    $108    $80    $80    $16    $16  

Common collective trusts

                

Fixed income

   4,357     4,357     4,470     4,470     4,832     4,832     4,357     4,357  

Equity investments

   4,230     4,230     4,322     4,322     4,738     4,738     4,230     4,230  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $8,603    $8,603    $8,900    $8,900    $9,650    $9,650    $8,603    $8,603  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 20112012 and 2010:2011:

 

  

Short-term investments:    Shares of a money market portfolio, which is valued using amortized cost, which approximates fair value.

 

  

Common collective trusts:These investments are public investment securities valued using the net asset value (“NAV”)NAV provided by a third party investment advisor. The NAV is quoted on a private market that is not active; however, the unit price is based on underlying investments which are traded on an active market.

The Corporation anticipatesWe anticipate contributions of $135$215 to the plan in 2012.2013.

Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next ten years:

 

Year

  Amount   Amount 

2012

  $416  

2013

   415    $432  

2014

   508     526  

2015

   554     567  

2016

   559     567  

Years 2017 — 2021

   3,155  

2017

   593  

Years 2018 — 2022

   3,281  

The components of projected net periodic benefit cost are as follows for the year endedending December 31:

 

  2012   2013 

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

  $470    $450  

Expected return on plan assets

   (508   (572

Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss

   291     330  
  

 

   

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

  $253    $208  
  

 

   

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan

Pursuant to the terms of the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred CompensationDirectors Plan, for Directors (the “Directors Plan”),our directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees into the Directors Plan. The fees are converted on a quarterly basis into the shares of the Corporation'sour common stock based on the fair value of a share of common stock as of the relevant valuation date. Stock credited to a participant'sparticipant’s account is eligible for stock and cash dividends as declared. Upon retirement from the board or the occurrence of certain other events, the participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind, distribution of all of the stock that is then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and distributed, as well. The Directors Plan does not allow for cash settlement, and therefore, such share-based payment awards qualify for classification as equity. All authorized but unissued shares of common stock are eligible for issuance under the Directors Plan. The CorporationWe may also purchase shares of common stock on the open market to meet itsour obligations under the Directors Plan.

The Corporation maintains aWe maintain the Rabbi Trust to fund the Directors Plan. AThe Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the Corporationwe may contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the Corporationwe may not reach the assets of the Rabbi Trust (“Trust”) for any purpose other than meeting itsour obligations under the Directors Plan, the assets of the Rabbi Trust remain subject to the claims of the Corporation'sour creditors and are included in the consolidated financial statements. The CorporationWe may contribute cash or common stock to the Rabbi Trust from time to time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan. The Rabbi Trust will use any cash that the Corporationwe contributed to purchase shares of the Corporation'sour common stock on the open market through the Corporation'sour brokerage services department.

The components of shares eligible to be issued under the Directors Plan were as follows as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2012   2011 
  Eligible   Fair   Eligible   Fair   Eligible   Market   Eligible   Market 
  Shares   Value   Shares   Value   Shares   Value   Shares   Value 

Unissued

   201,438    $4,774     191,977    $3,321     165,436    $3,598     201,438    $4,774  

Shares held in Rabbi Trust

   16,585     393     32,686     565     5,130     112     16,585     393  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

   218,023    $5,167     224,663    $3,886     170,566    $3,710     218,023    $5,167  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Other Employee Benefit Plans

The Corporation maintainsWe maintain two nonqualified supplementary employee retirement plans to provide supplemental retirement benefits to specified participants. Expenses related to these programs for 2012, 2011, and 2010 were $382, $444, and 2009 were $444, $363, and $343, respectively, and are being recognized over the participants'participants’ expected years of service.

The Corporation maintainsWe maintain a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”) and a profit sharing planESOP which was frozen to new participants on December 31, 2006. Contributions to the plansplan are discretionary and are approved by the Board of Directors and recorded as compensation expense. During 2009,2012, the Board of Directors approved a contribution of $50$75 to the ESOP. The CorporationPrior to 2012, the most recent contribution was $50 in 2009. We made no contributions in 20102011 or 2011.2010. Compensation cost related to the plansplan for 2012, 2011, and 2010 was $102, $20, and 2009 were $20, $0, and $50, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related to the ESOP at December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, and 20092010 were 246,404, 246,419,246,404, and 271,421,246,419, respectively. Such shares are included in the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of the respective years.

The Corporation maintainsWe maintain a self-funded medical plan under which the Corporation iswe are responsible for the first $50$75 per year of claims made by a covered family. Medical claims are subject to a lifetime maximum of $5,000 per covered individual. Expenses are accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred and the Corporation'sour experience. Expenses were $2,534 in 2012, $2,045 in 2011 and $2,101 in 2010 and $2,155 in 2009.

The Corporation maintains the Isabella Bank Corporation Stockholder Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Dividend Reinvestment Plan”). The dividend reinvestment feature of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan allows shareholders to purchase previously unissued Isabella Bank Corporation common shares using dividends paid on shares held in the plan. The employee stock purchase feature of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan allows employees and directors to purchase Isabella Bank Corporation common stock through payroll deduction. The shareholder stock purchase feature of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan enables existing shareholders to purchase additional shares of the Corporation’s stock directly from the Corporation. The number of shares reserved for issuance under these plans were 885,000, with 197,719 shares unissued at December 31, 2011. During 2011, 2010 and 2009, 115,359, 124,904, and 126,874 shares were issued for $2,192, $2,203, and $2,396, respectively, in cash pursuant to these plans.2010.

NOTE 18 — ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

ComprehensiveAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes net income as well as unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on available-for-saleAFS investment securities owned and changes in the funded status of the Corporation’sour defined benefit pension plan, which are excluded from net income. Unrealized investmentAFS securities gains and losses and changes in the funded status of the pension plan, net of tax, are excluded from net income, and are reflected as a

direct charge or credit to shareholders’ equity. Comprehensive income (loss) and the related components are disclosed in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009.comprehensive.

The following is a summary of the components comprising the balance of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) reported on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31 (presented net of tax):

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 

Unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment securities

  $5,942   $444    $8,678   $5,942  

Unrecognized pension costs

   (3,453  (2,153   (3,671  (3,453
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  $2,489   $(1,709

Accumulated other comprehensive income

  $5,007   $2,489  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

NOTE 19 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation grantswe grant loans to principal officers and directors and their affiliates (including their families and companies in which they have 10% or more ownership). Annual activity during the years ended December 31 consisted of the following:

 

  2011 2010   2012 2011 

Balance, beginning of year

  $4,347   $4,142  

Balance, January 1

  $3,728   $4,347  

New loans

   1,800    3,038     8,435    1,800  

Repayments

   (2,419  (2,833   (5,565  (2,419
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Balance, ending of year

  $3,728   $4,347  

Balance, December 31

  $6,598   $3,728  
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total deposits of these principal officers and directors and their affiliates amounted to $7,664$6,871 and $11,556$7,664 at December 31, 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively. In addition, Isabella Bank Corporation’s Employee Stock Ownership Planthe ESOP held deposits with the Bank aggregating $275$517 and $254,$275, respectively, at December 31, 20112012 and 2010.2011.

From time to time, we make charitable donations to the Isabella Bank Foundation (the “Foundation”), which is an affiliated nonprofit entity formed for the purpose of distributing charitable donations to recipient organizations generally located in the communities we service. Donations are expensed when committed to the Foundation as they are non-refundable. The assets and transactions of the Foundation are not included in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table displays ending balances of, and our contributions to, the Foundation as of, and for the years ended, December 31:

   2012   2011   2010 

Ending assets

  $1,766    $1,150    $1,108  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contributions

  $850    $250    $250  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 20 — FAIR VALUE

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value in their Entirety on a Recurring Basis

Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, the Corporation uses present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of its financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheets are as follows as of December 31:

   2011   2010 
   Estimated   Carrying   Estimated   Carrying 
   Fair Value   Value   Fair Value   Value 

ASSETS

  

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

  $28,590    $28,590    $18,109    $18,109  

Certicates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   8,977     8,924     15,908     15,808  

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

   3,252     3,205     1,182     1,182  

Net loans

   756,802     737,916     734,634     722,931  

Accrued interest receivable

   5,848     5,848     5,456     5,456  

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

   17,189     17,189     17,564     17,564  

Originated mortgage servicing rights

   2,374     2,374     2,673     2,667  

LIABILITIES

  

Deposits without stated maturities

   476,627     476,627     424,978     424,978  

Deposits with stated maturities

   499,644     481,537     454,332     452,361  

Borrowed funds

   222,538     210,894     190,180     184,494  

Accrued interest payable

   967     967     1,003     1,003  

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:

  2011  2010 

Description

 Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 

Recurring items

       

Trading securities

       

States and political subdivisions

 $4,710   $    4,710   $   $5,837   $5,837   $  

Available-for-sale investment securities

       

Government-sponsored enterprises

  397        397        5,404    5,404      

States and political subdivisions

  174,938        174,938        169,717    169,717      

Auction rate money market preferred

  2,049        2,049        2,865        2,865  

Preferred stock

  5,033    5,033            6,936        6,936  

Mortgage-backed

  143,602        143,602        102,215    102,215      

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  99,101        99,101        43,587    43,587      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale investment securities

  425,120    5,033    420,087        330,724    320,923    9,801  

Borrowed funds

  5,242        5,242        10,423    10,423      

Nonrecurring items

       

Impaired loans

  25,250         25,250    12,048        12,048  

Originated mortgage servicing rights

  2,374        2,374        2,667    2,667      

Foreclosed assets

  1,876        1,876        2,067    2,067      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 $464,572   $5,033   $434,289   $25,250   $363,766   $341,917   $21,849  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value

   1.08  93.48  5.44   93.99  6.01
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

 

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies, and key inputs, used to measure financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. For financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, the description includes an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.

Cash and demand deposits due from banks:

The carrying amounts of cash and short term investments, including Federal funds sold, approximate fair values. As such, we classify cash and demand deposits due from banks as Level 1.

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions:

Interest bearing balances held in unaffiliated financial institutions include certificates of deposit and other short term interest bearing balances that mature within 3 years. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics. As such, we classify certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions as Level 2.

Investment securities:

Investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Level 1 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments. Level 2 fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and liquidity assumptions. Level 2 securities include bonds issued by government sponsored enterprises, states and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations issued by government sponsored enterprises, and auction rate money market preferred securities. The values for Level 1 and Level 2 investment securities are generally obtained from an independent third party. On a quarterly basis, management compareswe compare the values provided to alternative pricing sources.

Securities classified as Level 3 in 2010 included securities in less liquid markets and included

Due to the limited trading activity of certain auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks. Due to the limited trading ofstocks, we measured these securities during 2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair values on December 31, 2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, the current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the interest rates of similarly rated financial institution debt based on the weighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90%Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2010. During 2011,As the markets for these securities have normalized and established regular trading patterns. As a result of this normalization, the Corporationpatterns, we measured preferred stocks with fair values of $5,033 utilizing Level 1 inputs and the auction rate money market preferred securities with fair values of $2,049security utilizing Level 2 inputs based on the trade price of similar securities as of December 31, 2011.2011 and continued to measure at these levels as of December 31, 2012.

The table below represents the activity in auction rate money market preferred available-for-sale investmentand preferred stock AFS securities measured with Level 3 inputs on a recurring basis for the yearsyear ended December 31:31, 2011:

 

   2011  2010 

Level 3 inputs — January 1

  $2,865   $2,973  

Transfer to Level 2 inputs

   (2,049    

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities

   (816  (108
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31

  $   $2,865 ��
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   Auction Rate
Money Market
Preferred
  Preferred
Stocks
 

Level 3 inputs — January 1, 2011

  $2,865   $6,936  

Calls

       (1,000

Transfer to Level 1 inputs

       (5,033

Transfer to Level 2 inputs

   (2,049    

Net unrealized losses on AFS securities

   (816  (903
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31, 2011

  $   $  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The table below represents the activity in preferred stock available-for-sale investment securitiesWe had no financial instruments measured with Level 3 inputs on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31:during 2012.

   2011  2010 

Level 3 inputs — January 1

  $6,936   $7,054  

Calls

   (1,000    

Transfer to Level 1 inputs

   (5,033    

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities

   (903  (118
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31

  $   $6,936  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Mortgage loans available-for-sale:

Mortgage loans available-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans available-for-sale are based on what price secondary markets are currently offering for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the Corporation classifieswe classify loans subjectedsubject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Loans:

For variable rate loans with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are adjusted to estimate the effect of changes in the credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated. Upon reviewing our assumptions related to the estimation of the fair value of loans, we transferred loans with an estimated fair value of $751,009 as of December 31, 2012 from nonrecurring Level 2 assets to nonrecurring Level 3 assets. As such, we classify loans as level 3 assets.

The Corporation doesWe do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is consideredloans are classified as impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will be significantly different than the contractual terms of the original loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as impaired, management measureswe measure the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value, or discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans.

The Corporation reviewsWe review the net realizable values of the underlying collateral for collateral dependent impaired loans on at least a quarterly basis for all loan types. To determine the collateral value, management utilizes independent appraisals, broker price opinions, or internal evaluations. These valuations are reviewed to determine whether an additional discount should be applied given the age of market information that may have been considered as well as other factors such as costs to carry and sell an asset if it is determined that the collateral will be liquidated in connection with the ultimate settlement of the loan. The Corporation usesWe use these valuations to determine if any charge offs or specific reserves are necessary. The CorporationWe may obtain new valuations in certain circumstances, including when there has been significant deterioration in the condition of the collateral, if the foreclosure process has begun, or if the existing valuation is deemed to be outdated.

Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the net realizable value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. WhenDue to the fair valueinherent level of estimation in the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraisal value, the Corporation records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When a current appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, the Corporation records thevaluation process, we record impaired loans as nonrecurring Level 3.

The table below lists the quantitative information about impaired loans measured utilizing Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2012:

Valuation
Techniques

 

Fair Value

  

Unobservable
Input

  

Range

    Duration of cash flows  14 — 120 Months

Discounted cash flow

 $10,522  Reduction in interest rate from original loan terms  5.00% — 6.25%
    Discount applied to collateral appraisal:  
    Real Estate  20% — 30%
    Equipment  50%

Discounted appraisal value

 $11,499  Livestock  50%
    Cash crop inventory  50%
    Other inventory  75%
    Accounts receivable  75%

Accrued interest:

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value. As such, we classify accrued interest as Level 1.

Goodwill and other intangible assets:

Acquisition intangibles and goodwill are evaluated for potential impairment on at least an annual basis. Goodwill isAcquisition intangibles and goodwill are typically qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not that the carrying balance is impaired. If it is determined that the carrying balance of acquisition intangibles or goodwill is more likely than not to be impaired,

management performs we perform a cash flow valuation to determine the extent of the potential impairment. Acquisition intangibles are tested for impairment with a cash flow valuation. This valuation method requires a significant degree of management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted net operating cash flows for these intangible assets are less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation model. If the testing resulted in impairment, the Corporationwe would classify goodwill and other acquisition intangibles subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3. For the years ended December 31,During 2012 and 2011 and 2010, there were no impairments recorded on goodwill and other acquisition intangibles.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values:

The Corporation has investmentsIncluded in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are FHLB Stock and FRB Stock as well as our ownership interests in Corporate Settlement Solutions and Valley Financial Corporation. The investment in Corporate Settlement Solutions, a title insurance company, was made in the 1st quarter 2007. The Corporation is not the managing entity of Corporate Settlement Solutions, LLC, and accounts for its investment in that entity under the equity method of accounting. Valley Financial Corporation is the parent company of 1st State Bank in Saginaw, Michigan, which is a de novo bank that opened in 2005. The Corporation made investments in joint ventures. The assets are individually reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if an indication of impairment exists, by comparing the carrying value to the estimated fair value. Valley Financial Corporation in 2004 and in 2007.

The lack of an active market, or other independent sourcesources to validate fair value estimates includingcoupled with the impact of future capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent limitation in the valuation process. The Corporation classifies nonmarketable equity securities and itsAs the fair values of these investments in joint ventures subjected to nonrecurringare not readily determinable, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value adjustmentshierarchy; however, they are reviewed quarterly for impairment. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, it would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3. For the years ended December 31,3 fair value adjustment. During 2012 and 2011, and 2010, there were no impairments recorded on equity securities without readily determinable fair values.

Foreclosed assets:

Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets are adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Net realizable value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral, or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral and as such,collateral. Upon reviewing our assumptions related to the Corporation classifiesestimation of the fair value of loans, we transferred foreclosed assets with an estimated fair value of $2,018 as aof December 31, 2012 from nonrecurring Level 2. When management determines that2 assets to nonrecurring Level 3 assets. Due to the net realizable valueinherent level of estimation in the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value but there is no observable market price, the Corporation records thevaluation process, we record foreclosed assetassets as nonrecurring Level 3.

The table below lists the quantitative information related to foreclosed assets measured utilizing Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2012:

Valuation Technique

Fair Value

Unobservable Input

Range
Discount applied to
collateral appraisal:

Discounted appraisal value

$2,018Real Estate20%

30%
Equipment ��50%

Originated mortgage servicing rights:

Originated mortgage servicing rights areOMSR is subject to impairment testing. A valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined by management, is used for impairment testing. If the valuation model reflects a value less than the carrying value, originated mortgage servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation classifieswe classify loan servicing rights subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 2.

Deposits:

Demand,The fair value of demand, savings, and money market deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts)., and are classified as Level 1. Fair values for variable rate certificates of deposit approximate their recorded carrying value. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits. As such, certificates of deposit are classified as Level 2.

Borrowed funds:

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under overnight repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. The fair values of the Corporation’s other borrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing arrangements.

The Corporation hasWe elected to measure a portion of borrowed funds at fair value.value as of December 31, 2011. These borrowings arewere recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value measurement estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Changes in the fair value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds are classified as Level 2.

The activity in borrowings which we have elected to carry at fair value was as follows for the years ended December 31:

   2012  2011 

Borrowings carried at fair value — beginning of year

  $5,242   $10,423  

Paydowns and maturities

   (5,209  (5,000

Net unrealized change in fair value

   (33  (181
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Borrowings carried at fair value — December 31

  $   $5,242  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unpaid principal balance — December 31

  $   $5,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and undisbursed loans:

Fair values for off balance sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into consideration the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties'counterparties’ credit standings. The Corporation doesAs we do not charge fees for lending commitments; thuscommitments outstanding, it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of these instruments.

The preceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the Corporation believes itswe believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement.

Estimated Fair Values of Financial Instruments Not Recorded at Fair Value in their Entirety on a Recurring Basis

Disclosure of the estimated fair values of financial instruments, which differ from carrying values, often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, we use present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of our financial instruments. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis on our consolidated balance sheets are as follows as of December 31:

  2012 
  Carrying
Value
  Estimated
Fair Value
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
ASSETS     

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

 $24,920   $24,920   $24,920   $   $  

Certicates of deposit held in other financial institutions

  4,465    4,475        4,475      

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

  3,633    3,680        3,680      

Total loans

  772,753    784,964            784,964  

Less allowance for loan losses

  (11,936  (11,936          (311,936
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans

  760,817    773,028            773,028  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

  5,227    5,227    5,227          

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values(1)

  18,118    18,118              

Originated mortgage servicing rights

  2,285    2,285        2,285      
LIABILITIES     

Deposits without stated maturities

  553,332    553,332    553,332          

Deposits with stated maturities

  464,335    472,630        472,630      

Borrowed funds

  241,001    248,822        248,822      

Accrued interest payable

  751    751    751          

  2011 
  Carrying
Value
  Estimated
Fair Value
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
ASSETS     

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

 $28,590   $28,590   $28,590   $   $  

Certicates of deposit held in other financial institutions

  8,924    8,977        8,977      

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

  3,205    3,252        3,252      

Total loans

  750,291    769,177        743,927    25,250  

Less allowance for loan losses

  (12,375  (12,375      (8,255  (4,120
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans

  737,916    756,802        735,672    21,130  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

  5,848    5,848    5,848          

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values(1)

  17,189    17,189              

Originated mortgage servicing rights

  2,374    2,374        2,374      
LIABILITIES     

Deposits without stated maturities

  476,627    476,627    476,627          

Deposits with stated maturities

  481,537    499,644        499,644      

Borrowed funds

  210,894    222,538        222,538      

Accrued interest payable

  967    967    967          

(1)Due to the characteristics of equity securities without readily determinable fair values, they are not disclosed under a specific fair value hierarchy. If we were to record an impairment adjustment related to these securities, such amount would be classified as a nonrecurring Level 3 fair value adjustment.

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value

The table below presents the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:

  2012  2011 

Description

 Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 

Recurring items

        

Trading securities

        

States and political subdivisions

 $1,573   $   $1,573   $   $4,710    $4,710   $  

Available-for-sale investment securities

        

Government-sponsored enterprises

  25,776        25,776        397     397      

States and political subdivisions

  182,743        182,743        174,938     174,938      

Auction rate money market preferred

  2,778        2,778        2,049     2,049      

Preferred stock

  6,363    6,363            5,033    5,033          

Mortgage-backed

  155,345        155,345        143,602     143,602      

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  131,005        131,005        99,101     99,101      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total available-
for-sale
investment
securities

  504,010    6,363    497,647        425,120    5,033    420,087      

Borrowed funds

                  5,242        5,242      

Nonrecurring items

        

Impaired loans

  22,021            22,021    21,130            21,130  

Originated mortgage servicing rights

  2,285        2,285        2,374        2,374      

Foreclosed assets

  2,018            2,018    1,876        1,876      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 $531,907   $6,363   $501,505   $24,039   $460,452   $5,033   $434,289   $21,130  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value

   1.20  94.28  4.52   1.09  94.32  4.59
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, for which an impairment, or reduction of an impairment, was recognized in 2011 and 2010, are summarized as follows:

   Year Ended December 31 
   2011  2010 

Description

 Trading
Gains and
(Losses)
  Other Gains
and (Losses)
  Total  Trading
Gains and
(Losses)
  Other Gains
and (Losses)
  Total 

Recurring items

      

Trading securities

 $(78 $   $(78 $(94 $   $(94

Borrowed funds

      181    181        227    227  

Nonrecurring items

      

Foreclosed assets

      (82  (82      (180  (180

Originated mortgage servicing rights

      (243  (243      1    1  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $(78 $(144 $(222 $(94 $48   $(46
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The activity in borrowings which the Corporation has elected to carry at fair value was as follows for the years ended December 31:

 

   2011  2010 

Borrowings carried at fair value — beginning of year

  $10,423   $17,804  

Paydowns and maturities

   (5,000  (7,154

Net change in fair value

   (181  (227
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Borrowings carried at fair value — December 31

  $5,242   $10,423  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Unpaid principal balance — December 31

  $5,000   $10,000  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   2012  2011 

Description

  Trading
Losses
  Other Gains
and (Losses)
  Total  Trading
Losses
  Other Gains
and (Losses)
  Total 

Recurring items

       

Trading securities

  $(52 $   $(52 $(78 $   $(78

Borrowed funds

       33    33        181    181  

Nonrecurring items

       

Foreclosed assets

       (166  (166      (82  (82

Originated mortgage servicing rights

       (58  (58      (243  (243
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $(52 $(191 $(243 $(78 $(144 $(222
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NOTE 21 — PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Condensed Balance Sheets

 

  December 31   December 31 
  2011   2010   2012   2011 
ASSETSASSETS  ASSETS  

Cash on deposit at subsidiary Bank

  $1,474    $301    $332    $1,474  

Securities available for sale

   3,567     1,929     3,939     3,567  

Investments in subsidiaries

   106,463     94,668     115,781     106,463  

Premises and equipment

   1,916     1,952     2,041     1,916  

Other assets

   52,060     53,481     52,398     52,060  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $165,480    $152,331    $174,491    $165,480  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYLIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY  

Other liabilities

  $10,697    $7,170    $10,002    $10,697  

Shareholders’ equity

   154,783     145,161     164,489     154,783  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $165,480    $152,331    $174,491    $165,480  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Condensed Statements of Income

 

  Year Ended December 31   Year Ended December 31 
  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Income

            

Dividends from subsidiaries

  $6,500    $6,250    $6,100    $6,125    $6,500    $6,250  

Interest income

   128     72     77     174     128     72  

Management fee and other

   1,201     1,340     993     2,037     1,201     1,340  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total income

   7,829     7,662     7,170     8,336     7,829     7,662  

Expenses

            

Salaries and benefits

   2,267     2,286     2,112  

Compensation and benefits

   2,424     2,267     2,286  

Occupancy and equipment

   370     356     430     370     370     356  

Audit and SOX compliance fees

   378     476     291  

Audit fees

   351     378     476  

Other

   1,089     932     1,074     945     1,089     932  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total expenses

   4,104     4,050     3,907     4,090     4,104     4,050  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   3,725     3,612     3,263     4,246     3,725     3,612  

Federal income tax benefit

   958     896     976     673     958     896  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
   4,683     4,508     4,239     4,919     4,683     4,508  

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

   5,527     4,537     3,561     7,287     5,527     4,537  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Net income

  $10,210    $9,045    $7,800    $12,206    $10,210    $9,045  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

 Year Ended December 31  Year Ended December 31 
 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

      

Net income

 $10,210   $9,045   $7,800   $12,206   $10,210   $9,045  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations

      

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  (5,527  (4,537  (3,561  (7,287  (5,527  (4,537

Undistributed earnings of equity securities without readily determinable fair values

  (459  160    (7

Share-based payment awards

  615    650    677    643    615    650  

Depreciation

  123    147    163    114    123    147  

Net amortization of investment securities

  7    5    6    4    7    5  

Deferred income tax benefit

  (48  (172  (570

Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash

   

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

  425    (48  (172

Changes in operating assets and liabilities which (used) provided cash

   

Other assets

  167    298    (748  (513  7    305  

Accrued interest and other liabilities

  757    1,883    517    (98  757    1,883  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

  6,304    7,319    4,284    5,035    6,304    7,319  

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

      

Activity in available-for-sale securities

      

Maturities, calls, and sales

  585    110    110    370    585    110  

Purchases

  (3,000              (3,000    

(Purchases) sales of equipment and premises

  (87  247    (466  (239  (87  247  

Advances to subsidiaries

      (250      (50      (250
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES

  (2,502  107    (356  81    (2,502  107  

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

      

Net increase (decrease) in other borrowed funds

  2,772    (1,550  700  

Net (decrease) increase in other borrowed funds

  (597  2,772    (1,550

Cash dividends paid on common stock

  (5,770  (5,421  (5,256  (6,074  (5,770  (5,421

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

  2,302    2,208    2,479    2,279    2,302    2,208  

Common stock repurchased

  (1,507  (2,020  (2,056  (1,361  (1,507  (2,020

Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations

  (426  (514  (767  (505  (426  (514
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES

  (2,629  (7,297  (4,900  (6,258  (2,629  (7,297
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  1,173    129    (972

Cash and cash equivelants at beginning of year

  301    172    1,144  

(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

  (1,142  1,173    129  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

  1,474    301    172  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR

 $1,474   $301   $172   $332   $1,474   $301  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

NOTE 22 — OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Corporation’sOur reportable segments are based on legal entities that account for at least 10 percent of net operating results. Retail banking operations for 2012, 2011, 2010, and 20092010 represent approximately 90% or greater of the Corporation’sour total assets and operating results. As such, no additional segment information is presented.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW

(All dollarsDollars in thousands)thousands except per share data)

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations for Isabella Bank Corporation.our operations. This discussion and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of the consolidated financial statements and statistical data included elsewhere in the Annual Report.

Executive Summary

Isabella Bank Corporation, as well as all other financial institutions in MichiganDespite the challenges and acrossuncertainty of the entire country, continues to experience the negative impacts on its operations from the persistent weak economy. The current economic environment, has ledwe are pleased to historically high levels of loans charged off and foreclosed asset and collection expenses.

In spite of the economic downturn that has occurred over the past few years, the Corporationreport our strongest earnings ever. There continues to be profitable, with net income of $10,210 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Not only has the Corporation remained profitable, its loan quality also compares well to its peers as its ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.95% as of December 31, 2011 compared to 3.26% for all bank holding companiesslight improvements in the Corporation’s peer group aslocal, regional, and national economies, but a large degree of September 30, 2011 (December 31, 2011 peer group ratios are not yet available). The Corporation’s interest margins alsoeconomic uncertainty remains. Our continued success throughout these challenging times is a direct result of our unwavering focus on community banking principles, prudent underwriting standards, and long term sustainable growth. This focus has enabled us to continue to be strong, asmeet the net yield on interest earning assets (on a fully taxable equivalent basis)needs of the communities we serve. Carefully managed growth is an important part of our strategy to maintain shareholder value. We are excited about the prospects of our new Freeland, Michigan office which was 3.87%opened in October 2012. The new location complements our existing office locations, increases our brand awareness in the Freeland area, and is expected to provide additional shareholder value for the year ended December 31, 2011.years to come.

Recent Legislation

The Health Care and Education Act of 2010, and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, couldthe Dodd-Frank Act, and the JOBS Act, have had, and are expected to continue to have, a significant impact on the Corporation’sour operating results in future periods. Aside fromWhile the legislation has been passed for these acts, much of the regulations have yet to be written. As such, the extent of the potential increases inimpact on our operations has yet to be determined. Of these three acts, the Corporation’s health care costs, the implementation of the new rules and requirements is likely to require a substantial commitment from the Corporation’s management.

The Dodd-Frank Act is very broadhas had, and complex legislation that puts in place a sweeping new financial services framework that is likely to have, the most significant regulatory and legal consequences and will likely impactimpact. This particular Act made sweeping changes in the Corporation’s future operating results. Implementationregulation of financial institutions aimed at strengthening the operation of the Act will require compliance with numerous new regulations, which will increase compliance and documentation costs. For more information, see the summaryfinancial services sector. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act underimplementation of some of the heading “Supervisionprovisions, we have had increases in compensation costs and Regulation” inthis trend is expected to continue.

In June 2012, the Corporation’s 2011 annual report on Form 10-K.FFIEC proposed new capital requirements for all financial institutions. In general, the proposal adds a new capital standard of equity capital to assets and increases the minimum capital ratios to be considered well capitalized. While these proposals are not yet final, they could significantly impact our capital requirements, which could impact our ability to pay dividends.

Other

The Corporation hasWe have not received any notices of regulatory actions as of February 16, 2012.March 1, 2013.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

The Corporation’sOur significant accounting policies are set forth in Note“Note 1 — Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Of these significant accounting policies, the Corporation considers itswe consider our policies regarding the allowance for loan losses,ALLL, acquisition intangibles and goodwill, and the determination of the fair value and assessment of other-than-temporary impairmentOTTI of investment securities to be itsour most critical accounting policies.

The allowance for loan lossesALLL requires management’sour most subjective and complex judgment. Changes in economic conditions can have a significant impact on the allowance for loan lossesALLL and, therefore, the provision for loan losses and results of operations. The Corporation hasWe have developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses,ALLL, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to itsour loan portfolio. The Corporation’sOur assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers which is not known to managementus at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For

additional discussion concerning the Corporation’s allowance for loan lossesour ALLL and related matters, see the detailed discussion to follow under the heading “Allowance for Loan Losses”. and “Note 6 — Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

United States generally accepted accounting principles require that the Corporationwe determine the fair value of the assets and liabilities of an acquired entity, and record their fair value on the date of acquisition. The

Corporation employsWe employ a variety of measures in the determination of the fair value, including the use of discounted cash flow analysis, market appraisals, and projected future revenue streams. For certain items that management believes it haswe believe we have the appropriate expertise to determine the fair value, managementwe may choose to use itsour own calculations of the value. In other cases, where the value is not easily determined, the Corporation consultswe consult with outside parties to determine the fair value of the identified asset or liability. Once valuations have been adjusted, the net difference between the price paid for the acquired entity and the net value of itsassets acquired on our balance sheet, including identifiable intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. ThisAcquisition intangibles and goodwill are qualitatively evaluated to determine if it is more likely than not amortized, butthat the carrying balance is evaluated for impairmentimpaired on at least an annuala quarterly basis.

The CorporationWe currently hashave both available-for-saleAFS and trading investment securities that are carried at fair value. Changes in the fair value of available-for-saleAFS investment securities are included as a component of other comprehensive income, while declines in the fair value of these securities below their cost that are other-than-temporary are reflected as realized losses in the consolidated statements of income. The change in value of trading investment securities is included in current earnings. Management evaluates available-for-saleWe evaluate AFS securities for indications of losses that are considered other-than-temporary, if any, on a regular basis. The market values for available-for-saleAFS and trading investment securities are typically obtained from outside sources and applied to individual securities within the portfolio.

Due to the limited trading of certain auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks during 2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair values on December 31, 2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, the current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the interest rates of similarly rated financial institution debt based on the weighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90% as of December 31, 2010. During 2011, the markets for these securities have normalized and established regular trading patterns. As such, the Corporation determined the fair value for these securities based on quoted prices for identical securities, or based on quoted prices for similar securities as of December 31, 2011.

DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

INTEREST RATE AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL

The following schedules present the daily average amount outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets, nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest bearing liabilities for the last three years. These schedules also presentspresent an analysis of interest income and interest expense for the periodsyears indicated. All interest income is reported on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE)an FTE basis using a 34% federal income tax rate. Nonaccruing loans, for the purpose of the following computations, are included in the average loan amounts outstanding. Federal ReserveFRB and Federal Home Loan BankFHLB stock holdings, which are restricted, are included in accrued income and other assets.

 

 Year Ended December 31  Year Ended December 31 
 2011 2010 2009  2012 2011 2010 
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield/
Rate
  Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 Average
Balance
 Tax
Equivalent
Interest
 Average
Yield/
Rate
 

INTEREST EARNING ASSETS

                  

Loans

 $743,441   $45,463    6.12 $725,534   $46,794    6.45 $725,299   $47,706    6.58 $754,304   $43,396    5.75 $743,441   $45,463    6.12 $725,534   $46,794    6.45

Taxable investment securities

  235,437    6,941    2.95  160,514    5,271    3.28  119,063    4,712    3.96  309,681    7,555    2.44  235,437    6,941    2.95  160,514    5,271    3.28

Nontaxable investment securities

  136,356    7,847    5.75  120,999    7,095    5.86  121,676    7,217    5.93  145,502    7,941    5.46  136,356    7,847    5.75  120,999    7,095    5.86

Trading account securities

  5,087    286    5.62  8,097    436    5.38  17,279    856    4.95

Federal funds sold

                          842    1    0.12

Trading securities

  2,624    142    5.41  5,087    286    5.62  8,097    436    5.38

Other

  37,539    506    1.35  45,509    479    1.05  27,433    376    1.37  33,359    486    1.46  37,539    506    1.35  45,509    479    1.05
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total earning assets

  1,157,860    61,043    5.27  1,060,653    60,075    5.66  1,011,592    60,868    6.02  1,245,470    59,520    4.78  1,157,860    61,043    5.27  1,060,653    60,075    5.66

NONEARNING ASSETS

                  

Allowance for loan losses

  (12,522    (13,262    (12,334    (12,408    (12,522    (13,262  

Cash and demand deposits due from banks

  20,195      18,070      18,190    

Cash and demand deposits

         

due from banks

  19,409      20,195      18,070    

Premises and equipment

  24,397      24,624      23,810      25,244      24,397      24,624    

Accrued income and other assets

  97,265      92,845      86,376      103,368      97,265      92,845    
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total assets

 $1,287,195     $1,182,930     $1,127,634     $1,381,083     $1,287,195     $1,182,930    
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

                  

Interest bearing demand deposits

 $152,530    189    0.12 $137,109    151    0.11 $116,412    146    0.13 $170,851    204    0.12 $152,530    189    0.12 $137,109    151    0.11

Savings deposits

  192,999    488    0.25  169,579    391    0.23  177,538    399    0.22  214,958    451    0.21  192,999    488    0.25  169,579    391    0.23

Time deposits

  467,931    10,258    2.19  430,892    10,988    2.55  398,356    13,043    3.27  473,675    8,476    1.79  467,931    10,258    2.19  430,892    10,988    2.55

Borrowed funds

  198,828    5,268    2.65  188,512    5,674    3.01  193,922    6,251    3.22  225,689    4,292    1.90  198,828    5,268    2.65  188,512    5,674    3.01
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total interest bearing liabilities

  1,012,288    16,203    1.60  926,092    17,204    1.86  886,228    19,839    2.24  1,085,173    13,423    1.24  1,012,288    16,203    1.60  926,092    17,204    1.86

NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES

                  

Demand deposits

  113,726      102,812      94,408      125,443      113,726      102,812    

Other

  15,456      14,171      7,188      9,785      9,802      8,722    

Shareholders’ equity

  145,725      139,855      139,810      160,682      151,379      145,304    
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 $1,287,195     $1,182,930     $1,127,634     $1,381,083     $1,287,195     $1,182,930    
 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

   

Net interest income (FTE)

  $44,840     $42,871     $41,029     $46,097     $44,840     $42,871   
  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)

    3.87    4.04    4.06    3.70    3.87    4.04
   

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

Net Interest Income

The Corporation derives the majorityOur primary sources of its gross income fromrevenues are interest earned on loans and investments, while itsour most significant expense is the interest cost incurred for funds used.expense on deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds the interest cost of deposits and borrowings.expenses on interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is influenced by changes in the balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest rates. Management exertsWe exert some control over these factors; however, Federal ReserveFRB monetary policy and competition have a significant impact. Interest income includes loan fees of $3,178 in 2012, $2,385 in 2011, and $2,196 in 2010, and $1,963 in

2009.2010. For analytical purposes, net

interest income is adjusted to a “taxable equivalent”an FTE basis by adding the

income tax savings from interest on tax exempt loans and securities, thus making year to year comparisons more meaningful.

VOLUME AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS

The following table details the dollar amount of changes in FTE net interest income for each major category of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the amount of change attributable to changes in average balances (volume) or average rates. The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.

 

  2011 Compared to 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 2010 Compared to 2009
Increase (Decrease) Due to
   2012 Compared to 2011
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 2011 Compared to 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 
  Volume Rate Net Volume Rate Net   Volume Rate Net Volume Rate Net 

CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME:

              

Loans

  $1,136   $(2,467 $(1,331 $15   $(927 $(912  $656   $(2,723 $(2,067 $1,136   $(2,467 $(1,331

Taxable investment securities

   2,254    (584  1,670    1,453    (894  559  

Nontaxable investment securities

   886    (134  752    (40  (82  (122

Trading account securities

   (168  18    (150  (489  69    (420

Federal funds sold

               (1      (1

Taxable AFS securities

   1,945    (1,331  614    2,254    (584  1,670  

Nontaxable AFS securities

   511    (417  94    886    (134  752  

Trading securities

   (134  (10  (144  (168  18    (150

Other

   (93  120    27    205    (102  103     (59  39    (20  (93  120    27  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total changes in interest income

   4,015    (3,047  968    1,143    (1,936  (793   2,919    (4,442  (1,523  4,015    (3,047  968  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE:

              

Interest bearing demand deposits

   18    20    38    24    (19  5     22    (7  15    18    20    38  

Savings deposits

   57    40    97    (18  10    (8   52    (89  (37  57    40    97  

Time deposits

   894    (1,624  (730  1,002    (3,057  (2,055   124    (1,906  (1,782  894    (1,624  (730

Borrowed funds

   299    (705  (406  (171  (406  (577   647    (1,623  (976  299    (705  (406
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total changes in interest expense

   1,268    (2,269  (1,001  837    (3,472  (2,635   845    (3,625  (2,780  1,268    (2,269  (1,001
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Net change in interest margin (FTE)

  $2,747   $(778 $1,969   $306   $1,536   $1,842    $2,074   $(817 $1,257   $2,747   $(778 $1,969  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

During 2011, average interest earning assets increased by $97,207. This increase resulted in $4,015 of additional interest income which exceeded the $3,047 decrease in interest income caused by declines in interest rates. Interest bearing liabilities increased $86,196 at a cost of $1,268 while the decline in rates, mostly thoseWe, like all financial institutions, are experiencing downward pressure on time deposits and borrowed funds, decreased interest expense by $2,269. The diminished interest income earned on assets resulted in a 0.17% decline in the net interest yield. Management anticipates that net interest margin yield will decline slightly during 2012 due to the following factors:

Based on the current economic conditions, management does not anticipate any changes in the target Fed funds rate in the foreseeable future. As such, changes in market rates may be unlikely. However, it is likely that the Corporation may see declines in the rates earned on interest earning assets as the interest rates on many types of loans including home equity lines of credit, residential balloon mortgages, variable rate commercial lines of credit, and investment securities with acceptable credit and interest rate risk are currently priced at or below the Corporation’s currentour net yield on interest earning assets. MostThis pressure is a direct result of the potential declines would arise out of the Corporation’s investment portfolio as the majority of securities that are called or mature in 2012 will be reinvested at significantly lower rates.

InterestFRB monetary policy which has reduced yields on interest earning assets more than rates on residential mortgage loans remain at or near historical lows. This rate environment has led to strong consumer demandinterest bearing liabilities. A key benchmark for fixed rate mortgage productslending is the 10 year US Treasury, which are generally sold to the secondary market.is currently trading below 2.0%. As a result there has beenof the persistent low interest rate environment, our net yield on interest earning assets is at historically low levels. However, as shown in the following table, our net yield on interest earning assets remained relatively flat throughout 2012. This is a significantdirect result of our restructuring of $60,000 of FHLB advances in the first quarter of 2012, which reduced 2012 interest expense by approximately $450.

  Average Yield/Rate For The Three Month Periods Ended: 
  December 31
2012
  September 30
2012
  June 30
2012
  March 31
2012
  December 31
2011
 

Total earning assets

  4.61  4.76  4.84  4.91  5.12

Total interest bearing liabilities

  1.12  1.18  1.27  1.38  1.53
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)

  3.65  3.73  3.73  3.70  3.78
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Given that the historically low interest rate environment is expected to continue for the foreseeable future, the net yield on interest earning assets is not likely to increase in future periods. We anticipate continued reduction in rates earned on loans without a proportionate decline in balloon mortgages, which are held on the Corporation’s consolidated balance sheet. As these balloon mortgages have paid off, the proceeds from these loans have been reinvested (typicallyfunding rates. Any additional interest income will most likely be contingent upon increases in volume and probably at interest margins lower than those earned in the formfourth quarter of available-for-sale investment securities) at lower interest rates which has adversely impacted interest income.2012.

While the Corporation’s liability sensitive balance sheet has allowed it to benefit from decreases in interest rates, it also makes the Corporation sensitive to increases in deposit and borrowing rates. As part

of the Corporation’s goal to minimize the potential negative impacts of possible increases in future interest rates, management has been, and continues to be, actively working to lengthen the terms of its interest bearing liabilities. This lengthening has increased the Corporation’s cost of funding, reducing net interest income in the short term.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The viability of any financial institution is ultimately determined by its management of credit risk. Loans outstanding represent the Corporation’sour single largest concentration of risk. The allowance for loan lossesALLL is management’sour estimation of probable losses inherent in the existing loan portfolio. Factors used to evaluateWe allocate the loan portfolio, and thus to determineALLL throughout the current charge to expense, include recent loan loss history, financial condition of borrowers, amount of nonperforming and impaired loans, overall economic conditions and other factors. The following schedule summarizes the Corporation’s chargeoff and recovery activity for the years ended December 31:

  2011  

 

 2010  

 

 2009  

 

 2008  

 

  2007 

Allowance for loan losses — January 1

 $12,373    $12,979    $11,982    $7,301     $7,605  

Allowance of acquired bank

                 822        

Loans charged off

          

Commercial and agricultural

  1,984     3,731     3,081     2,137      905  

Real estate mortgage

  2,240     2,524     2,627     3,334      659  

Consumer

  552     596     934     854      582  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total loans charged off

  4,776     6,851     6,642     6,325      2,146  

Recoveries

          

Commercial and agricultural

  461     453     623     160      297  

Real estate mortgage

  177     638     546     240      49  

Consumer

  314     297     377     284      285  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total recoveries

  952     1,388     1,546     684      631  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged off

  3,824     5,463     5,096     5,641      1,515  

Provision charged to income

  3,826     4,857     6,093     9,500      1,211  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses —
December 31

 $12,375    $12,373    $12,979    $11,982     $7,301  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Year to date average loans

 $743,441    $725,534    $725,299    $717,040     $604,342  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding

  0.51%    0.75%    0.70%    0.79%     0.25% 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total amount of loans outstanding

 $750,291    $735,304    $723,316    $735,385     $612,687  
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans

  1.65%    1.68%    1.79%    1.63%     1.19% 
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

The Corporation originates and sells fixed rate residential real estate mortgages to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). The Corporation has not originated loans for either trading or its own portfolio that would be classified as subprime, nor has it originated adjustable rate mortgages or financed loans for more than 80% of market value unless insured by private third party insurance.

As shown in the preceding table, when comparing 2011 to 2010, net loans charged off decreased by $1,639. This improvement allowed the Corporation to reduce its provision for loan losses. While there have been marked improvements in the level of net loans charged off, which has contributed to the Corporation’s ability to reduce its provision for loan losses, the overall local, regional and national economies have yet to show consistent improvement.

The Corporation allocates the allowance throughout its loan portfolio based on management’sour assessment of the underlying risks associated with each loan segment. Management’sOur assessments include allocations based on specific impairment allocations, historical losses, internally assigned credit ratings, and past due and nonaccrual balances. A portion of the allowance for loan lossesALLL is not specifically allocated to any one loan segment, but is instead a reflection of other qualitative risks within the Corporation’s loan portfolio.

The following table summarizes our charge-off and recovery activity for the years ended December 31:

   2012  

 

  2011  

 

  2010  

 

 2009  

 

  2008 

ALLL — January 1

  $12,375     $12,373     $12,979    $11,982     $7,301  

ALLL of acquired bank

                          822  

Loans charged-off

             

Commercial and agricultural

   1,672      1,984      3,731     3,081      2,137  

Residential real estate

   1,142      2,240      2,524     2,627      3,334  

Consumer

   542      552      596     934      854  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total loans charged-off

   3,356      4,776      6,851     6,642      6,325  

Recoveries

             

Commercial and agricultural

   240      461      453     623      160  

Residential real estate

   122      177      638     546      240  

Consumer

   255      314      297     377      284  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total recoveries

   617      952      1,388     1,546      684  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

   2,300      3,826      4,857     6,093      9,500  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

ALLL — December 31

  $11,936     $12,375     $12,373    $12,979     $11,982  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged-off

  $2,739     $3,824     $5,463    $5,096     $5,641  

Year to date average loans

   754,304      743,441      725,534     725,299      717,040  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding

   0.36    0.51    0.75   0.70    0.79
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

Total loans

  $772,753     $750,291     $735,304    $723,316     $735,385  
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

ALLL as a % of loans

   1.54    1.65    1.68   1.79    1.63
  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

The following table summarizes our charge-off and recovery activity for the three months ended:

  Three Months Ended 
  December 31
2012
  September 30
2012
  June 30
2012
  March 31
2012
  December 31
2011
 

Total loans charged-off

 $1,469   $611   $621   $655   $1,170  

Total recoveries

  143    155    125    194    202  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged-off

  1,326    456    496    461    968  

Average loans outstanding

  764,004    761,069    748,223    743,921    749,840  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net loans charged-off to average loans outstanding

  0.17  0.06  0.07  0.06  0.13
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

In the fourth quarter of 2012, we experienced a significant increase in charge-offs. Of the $1,469 of total loans charged-off during the quarter, $356 had previously been identified through specific impairment valuation allowances. The remaining charge-offs were identified in the fourth quarter as part of our credit risk management process. Of those not previously identified as impaired, two charge-offs totaling $357 individually exceeded $100.

Despite the increase in loans charged-off in the fourth quarter of 2012, the level of net loans charged-off has continued to trend downward since 2008. This trend, coupled with declines in loans past due and in nonaccrual status, has allowed us to reduce our provision, and has led to a decline in the ALLL in both amount and as a percentage of loans. For further discussion onof the allocation of the allowance for loan losses,ALLL, see “Note 6 Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” to the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

Loans Past Due and Loans in Nonaccrual Status

Increases in past due and nonaccrual loans can have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses.ALLL. To determine the potential impact, and corresponding estimated losses, management analyzes itswe analyze our historical loss trends on loans past due 30-89 days, 90 days or more, and nonaccrual loans. We monitor all loans that are past due and in nonaccrual status for indicators of additional deterioration.

The following tables summarize the Corporation’sour past due and nonaccrual loans as of December 31:

 

   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual 
   2011   2010   2009   2008   2007 

Commercial and agricultural

  $7,420    $9,606    $8,839    $13,958    $8,746  

Residential mortgage

   5,297     8,119     10,296     12,418     8,357  

Consumer installment

   186     309     460     956     617  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $12,903    $18,034    $19,595    $27,332    $17,720  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Total Past Due and Nonaccrual 
   2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 

Commercial and agricultural

  $7,271    $7,420    $9,606    $8,839    $13,958  

Residential real estate

   5,431     5,297     8,119     10,296     12,418  

Consumer

   199     186     309     460     956  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $12,901    $12,903    $18,034    $19,595    $27,332  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A summary of loans past due and in nonaccrual status, including the composition of the ending balance of nonaccrual loans by type, is included in “Note 6 — Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

   2011 
               

Total

Past Due

and

 
   Accruing Loans Past Due       
       90 Days       
   30-89 Days   or More   Nonaccrual   Nonaccrual 

Commercial and agricultural

  $2,149    $466    $4,805    $7,420  

Residential mortgage

   3,424     289     1,584     5,297  

Consumer installment

   181     5          186  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $5,754    $760    $6,389    $12,903  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

   2010 
               

Total

Past Due

and

 
   Accruing Loans Past Due       
       90 Days       
   30-89 Days   or More   Nonaccrual   Nonaccrual 

Commercial and agricultural

  $5,291    $175    $4,140    $9,606  

Residential mortgage

   6,339     310     1,470     8,119  

Consumer installment

   308     1          309  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $11,938    $486    $5,610    $18,034  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s troubled debt restructurings as of December 31:

  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007 
  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
  Non-
accrual
  Total  Accruing
Interest
 

Current

 $16,125   $514   $16,639   $4,798   $499   $5,297   $2,754   $786   $3,540   $2,297   $1,355   $3,652   $517  

Past due 30-89 days

  1,614    429    2,043    277    26    303    107    904    1,011    268        268    115  

Past due 90 days or more

      74    74        163    163        426    426        630    630    53  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $17,739   $1,017   $18,756   $5,075   $688   $5,763   $2,861   $2,116   $4,977   $2,565   $1,985   $4,550   $685  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

The Corporation had no troubled debt restructurings in nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2007.

AsWe have taken a result of adopting the amendments in ASU No. 2011-02, the Corporation reassessed all loan restructurings that occurred on or after January 1, 2011 for identification as troubled debt restructurings (TDR’s). The Corporation identified as TDR’s certain loans for which the allowance for loan losses had previously been measured under a general allowance for loan losses methodology. Upon identifying those loans as TDR’s, the Corporation identified them as impaired. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-02 require prospective application of the impairment measurement guidance for those loans newly identified as impaired. The Corporation’s recorded investment in loans for which the allowance for credit losses was previously measured under a general allowance for credit losses methodology and are now impaired was $5,136, with a specific valuation allowance of $1,022 as of December 31, 2011.

The Corporation has taken aggressive actionsproactive approach to avoid foreclosures on borrowers who are willing to work with the Corporationus in modifying their loans, thus making them more affordable. These loan modifications haveWhile this approach has allowed certain borrowers to develop a payment structure that will allow them to continue making payments in lieu of foreclosure.foreclosure, it has contributed to a significant increase in the level of loans classified as TDR. The implementation of ASU No. 2011-02“A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled debt restructuringsDebt Restructuring” has also contributed to the increased level of TDR’s. The modifications have been extremely successful for us and our customers as very few of the modified loans have resulted in foreclosures. At the time of the TDR, the loan is reviewed to determine whether or not to classify the loan as accrual or nonaccrual. The majority of new modifications result in terms that satisfy our criteria for continued interest accrual. TDR’s that have been placed in nonaccrual status may be placed back on accrual status after six months of continued performance.

Loan modifications are considered to be TDR’s when the modification results in terms outside of normal lending practices to a borrower who is experiencing financial difficulties.

Typical concessions granted include, but are not limited to:

1. Agreeing to interest rates below prevailing market rates forWe restructure debt with similar risk characteristics.

2. Extendingborrowers who due to temporary financial difficulties are unable to service their debt under the original terms. We may extend the amortization period, beyond typical lending guidelinesreduce interest rates, forgive principal, or a combination of these modifications. Typically, the modifications are for debta period of five years or less. There are no TDR’s that were Government sponsored as of December 31, 2012.

Losses associated with similar risk characteristics.

3. Forbearance of principal.

4. Forbearance of accrued interest.

To determineTDR’s, if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, the Corporation considers if:

1. The borrower is currently in default on any, of their debt.

2. It is likely that the borrower would default on any of their debt if the concession was not granted.

3. The borrower’s cash flow was sufficient to service all of their debt if the concession was not granted.

4. The borrower has declared, or isare included in the processestimation of declaring, bankruptcy.

5. The borrowerthe ALLL in the quarter in which a loan is unlikely to continueidentified as a going concern (ifTDR, and we review the entity is a business).ALLL estimation each reporting period to ensure its continued appropriateness.

The following tables summarize concessions granted byprovide a roll-forward of TDR’s for the Corporationyears ended December 31, 2011 and 2012:

  Accruing Interest  Nonaccrual  Total 
  Number
of
     Number
of
     Number
of
    
  Loans  Balance  Loans  Balance  Loans  Balance 

January 1, 2011

  35   $5,075    10   $688    45   $5,763  

New modifications

  93    17,334    3    481    96    17,815  

Principal payments and pay-offs

  (12  (4,381  (2  (254  (14  (4,635

Balances charged-off (1)

      (15      (51      (66

Transfers to OREO

  (2  (35  (1  (86  (3  (121

Transfers to accrual status

  2    54    (2  (54        

Transfers to nonaccrual status

  (4  (293  4    293          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

  112    17,739    12    1,017    124    18,756  

New modifications

  51    8,658    16    2,708    67    11,366  

Principal payments and pay-offs

  (41  (9,312  (3  (595  (44  (9,907

Balances charged-off

  (2  (246  (4  (196  (6  (442

Transfers to OREO

  (4  (173  (3  (245  (7  (418

Transfers to accrual status

  2    130    (2  (130        

Transfers to nonaccrual status

  (3  (265  3    265          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

  115   $16,531    19   $2,824    134   $19,355  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Balances charged-off represent a partial charge off. As such, the number of loans was unaffected.

The following table summarizes our TDR’s as of December 31:

  2012  2011  2010 
  Accruing  Non-     Accruing  Non-     Accruing  Non-    
  Interest  accrual  Total  Interest  accrual  Total  Interest  accrual  Total 

Current

 $16,301   $941   $17,242   $16,125   $514   $16,639   $4,798   $499   $5,297  

Past due 30-59 days

  158    561    719    1,564    344    1,908    175    26    201  

Past due 60-89 days

  72    41    113    50    85    135    102        102  

Past due 90 days or more

      1,281    1,281        74    74        163    163  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $16,531   $2,824   $19,355   $17,739   $1,017   $18,756   $5,075   $688   $5,763  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

   2009   2008 
   Accruing   Non-       Accruing   Non-     
   Interest   accrual   Total   Interest   accrual   Total 

Current

  $2,754    $786    $3,540    $2,297    $1,355    $3,652  

Past due 30-59 days

   107     80     187     268          268  

Past due 60-89 days

        824     824                 

Past due 90 days or more

        426     426          630     630  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $2,861    $2,116    $4,977    $2,565    $1,985    $4,550  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additional disclosures about TDR’s are included in “Note 6 — Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” of the Notes to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties inConsolidated Financial Statements.

Impaired Loans

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans as of and for the year ended December 31:

 

   2011 
   Below Market
Interest Rate
   Below Market
Interest Rate
and
Extension of
Amortization Period
 
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
   Number
of
Loans
   Pre-
Modification
Recorded
Investment
 

Commercial

        

Commercial real estate

   1    $408         $  

Commercial other

   38     9,932     4     2,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

   39     10,340     4     2,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Agricultural other

   8     1,321            

Residential mortgage

        

Senior liens

   19     2,161     17     1,754  

Consumer

        

Secured

   6     65     1     4  

Unsecured

             2     20  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total consumer

   6     65     3     24  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   72    $13,887     24    $4,421  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   2012   2011 
       Unpaid           Unpaid     
   Outstanding   Principal   Valuation   Outstanding   Principal   Valuation 
   Balance   Balance   Allowance   Balance   Balance   Allowance 

TDR’s

            

Commercial real estate

  $9,227    $9,640    $1,333    $8,862    $9,055    $1,853  

Commercial other

   1,167     1,197     38     1,047     1,078     271  

Agricultural real estate

   91     91     32                 

Agricultural other

   569     689     59     2,779     2,779     822  

Residential real estate senior liens

   8,224     8,670     1,429     5,882     6,377     922  

Residential real estate junior liens

   21     57     4     101     137     18  

Consumer secured

   56     56          85     85       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total TDR’s

   19,355     20,400     2,895     18,756     19,511     3,886  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other impaired loans

            

Commercial real estate

   1,817     2,304     320     4,136     6,657     28  

Commercial other

   2,245     2,376     359     52     116       

Agricultural real estate

                  190     190       

Agricultural other

   63     63          415     535       

Residential real estate senior liens

   2,226     3,002     354     1,389     2,450     189  

Residential real estate junior liens

   51     61     9     94     123     17  

Home equity lines of credit

   182     482          198     498       

Consumer secured

   19     28          20     29       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other impaired loans

   6,603     8,316     1,042     6,494     10,598     234 ��
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

  $25,958    $28,716    $3,937    $25,250    $30,109    $4,120  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation did not restructure anyAdditional disclosure related to impaired loans throughis included in “Note 6 — Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses” of the forbearance of principal or accrued interest during 2011.

The Corporation has been successful in its effortsNotes to restructure loans to reduce foreclosures. Of the 163 troubled debt restructurings granted since December 31, 2008, only 6 have defaulted.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Nonperforming Assets

The following table summarizes the Corporation’sour nonperforming assets as of December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009 2008 2007   2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 

Nonaccrual loans

  $6,389   $5,610   $8,522   $11,175   $4,156    $7,303   $6,389   $5,610   $8,522   $11,175  

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more

   760    486    768    1,251    1,727     428    760    486    768    1,251  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total nonperforming loans

   7,149    6,096    9,290    12,426    5,883     7,731    7,149    6,096    9,290    12,426  

Other real estate owned

   1,867    2,039    1,141    2,770    1,376  

OREO

   2,008    1,867    2,039    1,141    2,770  

Repossessed assets

   9    28    16    153         10    9    28    16    153  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total nonperforming assets

  $9,025   $8,163   $10,447   $15,349   $7,259    $9,749   $9,025   $8,163   $10,447   $15,349  
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans

   0.95  0.83  1.28  1.69  0.96

Nonperforming loans as % of total loans

   1.00  0.95  0.83  1.28  1.69
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets

   0.67  0.67  0.91  1.35  0.76

Nonperforming assets as a % of total loans

   0.68  0.67  0.67  0.91  1.35
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans are placed in nonaccrual status when the foreclosure process has begun, generally after a loan is 90 days past due, unless they are well secured and in the process of collection.secured. Upon transferring the loans to nonaccrual status, we perform an evaluation to determine the net realizable value of the underlying collateral is performed.collateral. This evaluation is used to help determine if any charge downsoffs are necessary. Loans may be placed back on accrual status after six months of continued performance.

The following table summarizesIncluded in the Corporation’s nonaccrual loan balances by typeabove were credits classified as TDR’s as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 

Commercial and agricultural

  $4,805    $4,140    $5,810    $8,059    $1,959    $2,325    $520    $115    $1,692    $1,985  

Residential mortgage

   1,584     1,470     2,657     3,092     2,185     499     497     573     424       

Consumer installment

             55     24     12  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $6,389    $5,610    $8,522    $11,175    $4,156    $2,824    $1,017    $688    $2,116    $1,985  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

IncludedNonaccrual TDR’s increased in nonaccrual commercial and agricultural loans was one loan with2012 as a result of two large TDR’s that were granted during 2012. These relationships had a balance of $1,900$1,710 as of December 31, 2011 and $2,679 as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2011, there was no specific allocation established for this loan as it has been charged down to reflect the current market value of the real estate, while there was a specific allocation established in the amount of $345 as of December 31, 2010. Nonaccrual2012.

The following table lists individually significant commercial and agricultural loan relationships in nonaccrual. To be classified as individually significant, the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans also included one loan with a balance of $1,014to each borrower must have exceeded $1,000 as of December 31, 2011, for which there was no specific allocation established as the net realizable valueend of the loan’s underlying collateral exceeded the loan’s outstanding balance. Commercial and agricultural nonaccrual loans included one credit with a balance of $1,800 as of December 31, 2009 which was subsequently transferred to other real estate owned in the third quarter of 2010. each period.

  2012  2011  2010  2009 
  Oustanding  Specific  Oustanding  Specific  Oustanding  Specific  Oustanding  Specific 
  Balance  Allocation  Balance  Allocation  Balance  Allocation  Balance  Allocation 

Borrower 1

 $ (A)  $   $1,014   $ (C)  $   $   $   $  

Borrower 2

   (B)       1,900     (D)   2,679    345          

Borrower 3

  2,077    359                          

Borrower 4

                   (B)       1,800     (D) 

Other not individually significant

  5,226     3,475     2,931     6,722   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

Total

 $7,303    $6,389    $5,610    $8,522   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

  

A — Transferred to accrual status.

B — Loan was partially charged-off with the remaining outstanding balance paid off by the customer.

C — No specific allocation as the net realizable value of the loan’s underlying collateral value exceeded the loan’s carrying balance.

D — No specific allocation established for this loan as it was charged down to reflect the current fair value of the underlying real estate.

There were no other individually significant credits included in nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, or 2007.2008.

Included in the nonaccrual loan balances above were credits currently classified as restructured loans as of December 31:

   2011   2010   2009   2008 

Commercial and agricultural

  $520    $115    $1,692    $1,985  

Residential mortgage

   497     573     424       
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  $1,017    $688    $2,116    $1,985  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation had no restructured loans in nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2007.

The Corporation has devotedWe continue to devote considerable attention to identifying impaired loans and adjusting the net carrying value of these loans to their current net realizable values through the establishment of a specific reserve or the recording of a charge off. To management’s knowledge,We believe that all loans that are deemed to be impaired have been recognized. A continued decline in real estate values may require further write downsidentified.

We believe that the level of loans in foreclosure and other real estate owned and could potentially have an adverse impact on the Corporation’s financial performance.

Based on management’s analysis, the allowance for loan lossesALLL is considered appropriate as of December 31, 2011. Management2012 and we will continue to closely monitor its overall credit quality and our policies and procedures related to the analysis of the ALLL to ensure that the allowance for loan lossesALLL remains appropriate.

NONINTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSES

Noninterest Income

The following table shows the changes in noninterest income between the years ended December 31:

 

      Change   Change       Change   Change 
  2011 2010 $ % 2009 $ %   2012 2011 $ % 2010 $ % 

Service charges and fees

                

NSF and overdraft fees

  $2,500   $2,809   $(309  –11.0 $3,187   $(378  –11.9  $2,367   $2,500   $(133  –5.3 $2,809   $(309  –11.0

ATM and debit card fees

   1,736    1,492    244    16.4  1,218    274    22.5   1,874    1,736    138    7.9  1,492    244    16.4

Trust fees

   979    896    83    9.3  814    82    10.1   1,061    979    82    8.4  896    83    9.3

Mortgage servicing fees

   732    760    (28  –3.7  724    36    5.0   757    732    25    3.4  760    (28  –3.7

Service charges on deposit accounts

   324    333    (9  –2.7  344    (11  –3.2   337    324    13    4.0  333    (9  –2.7

Net originated mortgage servicing rights (loss) income

   (293  47    (340  N/M    514    (467  –90.9

Net originated mortgage servicing rights loss

   (89  (293  204    69.6  47    (340  N/M  

All other

   140    143    (3  –2.1  112    31    27.7   125    140    (15  –10.7  143    (3  –2.1
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total service charges and fees

   6,118    6,480    (362  –5.6  6,913    (433  –6.3   6,432    6,118    314    5.1  6,480    (362  –5.6

Gain on sale of mortgage loans

   538    610    (72  –11.8  886    (276  –31.2   1,576    538    1,038    N/M    610    (72  –11.8

Net (loss) gain on trading securities

   (78  (94  16    17.0  80    (174  N/M  

Net gain on borrowings measured at fair value

   181    227    (46  –20.3  289    (62  –21.5

Gain on sale of available-for-sale investment securities

   3    348    (345  –99.1  648    (300  –46.3

Gain on sale of AFS securities

   1,119    3    1,116    N/M    348    (345  N/M  

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies

   698    609    89    14.6  663    (54  –8.1

Other

                

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies

   609    663    (54  –8.1  641    22    3.4

Brokerage and advisory fees

   545    573    (28  –4.9  521    52    10.0   574    545    29    5.3  573    (28  –4.9

Corporate Settlement Solutions joint venture

   (182  11    (193  N/M    (122  133    N/M     504    (182  686    N/M    11    (193  N/M  

Gain on sale of OREO

   220    62    158    N/M    12    50    N/M  

Net loss on trading securities

   (52  (78  26    33.3  (94  16    17.0

Net gain on borrowings measured at fair value

   33    181    (148  –81.8  227    (46  –20.3

All other

   484    482    2    0.4  300    182    60.7   426    422    4    0.9  470    (48  –10.2
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total other

   1,456    1,729    (273  –15.8  1,340    389    29.0   1,705    950    755    79.5  1,199    (249  –20.8
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total noninterest income

  $8,218   $9,300   $(1,082  –11.6 $10,156   $(856  –8.4  $11,530   $8,218   $3,312    40.3 $9,300   $(1,082  –11.6
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Significant changes in noninterest income are detailed below:

 

ManagementWe continuously analyzesanalyze various fees related to deposit accounts including service charges and NSF and overdraft fees. Based on these analyses, the Corporation makeswe make any necessary adjustments to ensure that itsour fee structure is within the range of itsour competitors, while at the same time making sure that the fees remain fair to deposit customers. NSF and overdraft fees represent the largest single component of service charges and fees. While we have been steadily declining over the past two years, with the decline acceleratingexperienced significant increases in the third quarter of 2010 as a result of new regulatory guidance issued by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Corporation anticipates thatdeposit accounts, NSF and overdraft fees will approximate current levelshave declined. This decline has been the result of reduced overdraft activity by our customers as well as changes in 2012.banking regulations. Despite increasing our per item NSF and overdraft fees in December 2012, we expect this downward trend to continue into the foreseeable future.

 

The increases inAs customers continue to increase their dependence on ATM and debit card fees are primarily the result of the increased usage of debit cards, by customers. As management doeswe have seen a corresponding increase in fees. We do not anticipate any significant changes to theour ATM and debit card fee structures,structure; however, we do expect that these fees are expected towill continue to increase as the usage of debit cards increases.

 

Trust feesIn recent periods, we have increased primarily dueinvested considerable efforts to increase our market share in trust and brokerage and advisory services. These efforts have translated into increases in the size of the managed portfolio. As management anticipates continued growth in trust services, it anticipates trust feesrevenues and we expect this trend to continue to increase in 2012.future periods.

 

Net originated mortgage servicing rights (OMSR) represent the fair value of servicing rights ofHistorically low offering rates on residential real estate loans soldhave led to the secondary market, with changesa significant increase in the fair value recorded in earnings. Changes in the fair

value of OMSR are primarily driven by fluctuations in the balance of loans sold to the secondary market and by offering rates on new residential mortgages. The losses incurred in 2011 were a result of historically low interest rates which increases the likelihood of refinancing activity, thus reducing the value of OMSR.

As a resultlevel of lower than normal residential mortgage rates, the Corporation experienced increases in the volume of loans sold to the secondary market during 2009, leading to a correspondingrefinancing activity. This increase in gains from the sale of mortgage loansactivity has resulted in 2009. As the demand for new mortgages declinedsubstantial increases in 2010 and 2011, so did the gain from the sale of mortgage loans. The Corporation anticipates that the gain on sale of mortgage loans, while contributing to fluctuations in the value of our OMSR portfolio. We anticipate that mortgage refinancing activity will decline in 2013.

We are continually analyzing our AFS security portfolio for potential sale opportunities. During the first quarter of 2012, we identified several pools of mortgage-backed securities with significant unrealized gains. As the interest rates of the underlying mortgages will remain atwere significantly higher than the current levelsoffering rates for similar mortgages, we elected to realize these gains through the sales of such securities as the investments would have likely been paid off in the near term through refinancing activity. In the third quarter of 2012, we elected to sell some additional mortgage-backed securities as their current prepayment characteristics had resulted in less than acceptable yields. We do not anticipate any significant investment sales during 2013.

Earnings on corporate owned life insurance policies have increased from 2011 as a result of the purchase of an additional $4,000 in policies in the third quarter of 2011. Future earnings are expected to approximate current levels.

In 2011, Corporate Settlement Solutions invested significant resources to expand and enhance their services offered. While these efforts reduced earnings in 2011, they have led to the significant increase in earnings in 2012. We expect future earnings to approximate current levels.

As market conditions have improved, we have been able to sell some of our OREO properties at gains. As property values and the facts and circumstances surrounding each property vary, this amount will fluctuate. We do not anticipate any assets currently included in OREO to generate significant gains or losses in future periods.

 

Fluctuations in the gains and losses related to trading securities and borrowings carriedmeasured at fair value are caused by interest rate variances. Management doesAs we do not anticipate any significant changes to interest rates in the foreseeable future, we do not anticipate any large fluctuations in net trading activities in 2012 as significant interest rate changes are not expected.future periods.

 

The Corporation continually analyzes its available-for-sale investment portfolio for advantageous selling opportunities.

The Corporation’s earnings from its joint venture in Corporate Settlement Solutions (a title insurance agency) have been negatively impacted by expenses incurred to enhance the services offered as well as expand their market area.

The fluctuationsfluctuation in all other income areis spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant. We do not anticipate any significant fluctuations from current levels in 2013.

Noninterest Expenses

The following table shows the changes in noninterest expenses between the years ended December 31:

 

          Change     Change          Change     Change 
  2011   2010   $ % 2009   $ %  2012   2011   $ % 2010   $ % 

Compensation and benefits

                     

Leased employee salaries

  $14,377    $13,697    $680    5.0 $13,494    $203    1.5

Leased employee benefits

   4,902     4,837     65    1.3  4,745     92    1.9

Employee salaries

 $15,374    $14,377    $997    6.9 $13,697    $680    5.0

Employee benefits

  5,842     4,902     940    19.2  4,837     65    1.3

All other

   13     18     (5  –27.8  19     (1  –5.3  11     13     (2  –15.4  18     (5  –27.8
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total compensation and benefits

   19,292     18,552     740    4.0  18,258     294    1.6  21,227     19,292     1,935    10.0  18,552     740    4.0
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Occupancy

                     

Property taxes

   470     505     (35  –6.9  439     66    15.0  501     470     31    6.6  505     (35  –6.9

Utilities

   462     423     39    9.2  393     30    7.6  463     462     1    0.2  423     39    9.2

Outside services

   587     524     63    12.0  433     91    21.0  605     587     18    3.1  524     63    12.0

Depreciation

   605     584     21    3.6  546     38    7.0  621     605     16    2.6  584     21    3.6

Building repairs

   262     243     19    7.8  288     (45  –15.6  244     262     (18  –6.9  243     19    7.8

All other

   84     72     12    16.7  71     1    1.4  85     84     1    1.2  72     12    16.7
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total occupancy

   2,470     2,351     119    5.1  2,170     181    8.3  2,519     2,470     49    2.0  2,351     119    5.1
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Furniture and equipment

                     

Depreciation

   1,916     1,938     (22  –1.1  1,803     135    7.5  1,796     1,916     (120  –6.3  1,938     (22  –1.1

Computer/service contracts

   1,898     1,779     119    6.7  1,676     103    6.1  1,995     1,898     97    5.1  1,779     119    6.7

ATM and debit card fees

   629     595     34    5.7  621     (26  –4.2  690     629     61    9.7  595     34    5.7

All other

   54     32     22    68.8  46     (14  –30.4  79     54     25    46.3  32     22    68.8
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total furniture and equipment

   4,497     4,344     153    3.5  4,146     198    4.8  4,560     4,497     63    1.4  4,344     153    3.5
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

FDIC insurance premiums

   1,086     1,254     (168  –13.4  1,730     (476  –27.5

Net AFS impairment loss

  282          282    N/M             N/M  
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Other

                     

Marketing and community relations

   1,174     1,093     81    7.4  894     199    22.3  1,965     1,174     791    67.4  1,093     81    7.4

Directors fees

  885     842     43    5.1  887     (45  –5.1

FDIC insurance premiums

  864     1,086     (222  –20.4  1,254     (168  –13.4

Audit fees

  711     714     (3  –0.4  710     4    0.6

Education and travel

  588     526     62    11.8  499     27    5.4

Consulting fees

  482     386     96    24.9  167     219    131.1

Printing and supplies

  424     405     19    4.7  420     (15  –3.6

Postage and freight

  389     388     1    0.3  395     (7  –1.8

Other losses

  300     54     246    N/M    72     (18  –25.0

Legal fees

  268     302     (34  –11.3  382     (80  –20.9

Amortization of deposit premium

  260     299     (39  –13.0  338     (39  –11.5

Foreclosed asset and collection

   576   �� 916     (340  –37.1  831     85    10.2  202     576     (374  –64.9  916     (340  –37.1

Legal fees

   302     382     (80  –20.9  415     (33  –8.0

Audit and SOX compliance fees

   714     710     4    0.6  546     164    30.0

Consulting fees

   386     167     219    131.1  201     (34  –16.9

Directors fees

   842     887     (45  –5.1  923     (36  –3.9

Amortization of deposit premium

   299     338     (39  –11.5  375     (37  –9.9

Education and travel

   526     499     27    5.4  395     104    26.3

Postage and freight

   388     395     (7  –1.8  472     (77  –16.3

Printing and supplies

   405     420     (15  –3.6  529     (109  –20.6

State taxes

  187     57     130    N/M    51     6    11.8

All other

   1,573     1,499     74    4.9  1,798     (299  –16.6  1,526     1,462     64    4.4  1,376     86    6.3
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total other

   7,185     7,306     (121  –1.7  7,379     (73  –1.0  9,051     8,271     780    9.4  8,560     (289  –3.4
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

  $34,530    $33,807    $723    2.1 $33,683    $124    0.4 $37,639    $34,530    $3,109    9.0 $33,807    $723    2.1
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Significant changes in noninterest expenses are detailed below:

 

LeasedThe increase in employee salaries increased during 2011is due to annual merit increases and staff additions. These staff additions have allowed the Corporation to continue to growour continued growth as well as additional staff additions to help comply with new regulations, including the Dodd-Frank Act. Leased employeeDodd Frank Act and other recently passed regulations. Employee benefits fluctuate from period to periodincreased in 2012 primarily as a result of changesincreases in health care and retirement benefit related expenses. The Corporation anticipates addingWe expect employee salaries and benefits to staffing levels inincrease with the growth of the Corporation.

During the first quarter of 2012, we recorded a credit impairment on an AFS investment security through earnings due to ensure compliance with new regulations set fortha bond being downgraded by an independent rating agency below investment grade. We will continue to monitor the investment portfolio throughout 2013 for other potential other-than-temporary impairments. For further discussion, see “Note 5 – Available-For-Sale Securities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

We have been a consistently strong supporter of the various communities, schools, and charities in the Dodd-Frank Act, whichmarkets we serve. In the 1996, we established a foundation that is estimatedgenerally funded from non-recurring revenue sources. The foundation provides centralized oversight for donations to increase salaryorganizations that benefit our communities. Donation expenses related to the foundation were $850, $250, and benefits by $331.$250 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively and is included in marketing and community relations.

 

FDIC insurance premium expense decreased in 2011premiums have declined due to changes toin the assessment rates on April 1, 2011.premium calculation. Premiums declined between 2009 and 2010 as a result of an FDIC special assessment of $479 in September 2009. Management expects FDIC insurance premiums to decline slightly in 2012 due to the changes in assessment rates.

Thewill increase in marketing and community relations in 2011 was primarily the result of a new initiativefuture periods as we continue to track customer service satisfaction as well as the enhancement of the Corporation’s website. The increase in marketing and community relations expenses in 2010 was primarily related to an increase in charitable contributions. Charitable contributions were essentially unchanged between 2010 and 2011 withgrow our balance sheet. There are no significant changes to the premium calculation expected in 2012.

While foreclosed asset and collection expenses remain at historically high levels, they have declined significantly from 2010. Management anticipates that these expenses will approximate current levels in 2012.

The Corporation’s legal expenses can fluctuate from period to period based on the volume of foreclosures as well as expenses related to the Corporation’s ongoing operations, including regulatory compliance. The Corporation does not anticipate any significant fluctuations in legal expenses in 2012.

Audit and SOX compliance fees fluctuate due to the timing of the performance of recurring audit procedures.

Director fees declined in 2011 due to the retirement of several directors. Director fees are expected to approximate current levels in 2012.

The Corporation places a strong emphasis on customer service. To help enhance customer service satisfaction, the Corporation has made a significant investment in various training programs. These programs coupled with the customer service tracking initiative (noted above) will increase service levels which will increase shareholder value. Management expects that education related expenses to remain at current levels in 2012.

Postage and freight expenses have declined, and are expected to continue to decline, as a result of fewer special mailings as well as an increase in the Corporation’s customer’s usage of electronic statements.

Printing and supplies expenses have steadily declined since 2009 as the Corporation has instituted a document imaging solution decreasing the amount of paper and related supplies. Management anticipates this trend to continue in 2012.2013.

 

The increase in consulting fees is primarily related to consulting services employed to review the FHLB advance restructure (see “Volume and Rate Variance Analysis”, above). Such expenses also increased due to succession planning for key executivesthe engagement of consultants to helpreview our loan prepayment and deposit decay assumptions as well as to review various information technology projects. Consulting fees are expected to decline in 2013.

Other losses increased significantly in 2012 primarily as a result of losses incurred related to fraudulent activities as well as losses related to the Boardrepurchase of Directorsa loan that was previously sold to a third party. We do not anticipate any significant other losses in 2013.

As a result of decreases in foreclosure and management identify, attract,repossession activity, we have seen significant declines in foreclosed asset and retaincollection and legal expenses. These expenses have also declined as we have been able to recover expenses through our collection efforts. Foreclosed asset and collection expenses are expected to continue their decline in 2013.

State taxes increased in 2012 as a result of changes to Michigan’s Corporate Income Tax structure. These expenses are expected to increase marginally in future leaders.periods.

 

The fluctuations in all other expenses are spread throughout various categories, none of which are individually significant.

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION

The following table shows the composition and changes in the Corporation’sour balance sheet as of December 31:

 

      Change       Change 
  2011 2010 $ %   2012 2011 $ % 

ASSETS

          

Cash and cash equivalents

  $28,590   $18,109   $10,481    57.88  $24,920   $28,590   $(3,670  –12.84

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

   8,924    15,808    (6,884  –43.55   4,465    8,924    (4,459  –49.97

Trading securities

   4,710    5,837    (1,127  –19.31   1,573    4,710    (3,137  –66.60

Available-for-sale securities

   425,120    330,724    94,396    28.54   504,010    425,120    78,890    18.56

Mortgage loans available-for-sale

   3,205    1,182    2,023    171.15   3,633    3,205    428    13.35

Loans

   750,291    735,304    14,987    2.04   772,753    750,291    22,462    2.99

Allowance for loan losses

   (12,375  (12,373  (2  0.02   (11,936  (12,375  439    –3.55

Premises and equipment

   24,626    24,627    (1  0.00   25,787    24,626    1,161    4.71

Corporate owned life insurance

   22,075    17,466    4,609    26.39   22,773    22,075    698    3.16

Accrued interest receivable

   5,848    5,456    392    7.18   5,227    5,848    (621  –10.62

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

   17,189    17,564    (375  –2.14   18,118    17,189    929    5.40

Goodwill and other intangible assets

   46,792    47,091    (299  –0.63   46,532    46,792    (260  –0.56

Other assets

   12,930    19,015    (6,085  –32.00   12,784    12,930    (146  –1.13
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $1,337,925   $1,225,810   $112,115    9.15  $1,430,639   $1,337,925   $92,714    6.93
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

          

Liabilities

          

Deposits

  $958,164   $877,339   $80,825    9.21  $1,017,667   $958,164   $59,503    6.21

Borrowed funds

   216,136    194,917    21,219    10.89   241,001    216,136    24,865    11.50

Accrued interest payable and other liabilities

   8,842    8,393    449    5.35   7,482    8,842    (1,360  –15.38
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total liabilities

   1,183,142    1,080,649    102,493    9.48   1,266,150    1,183,142    83,008    7.02

Shareholders’ equity

   154,783    145,161    9,622    6.63   164,489    154,783    9,706    6.27
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $1,337,925   $1,225,810   $112,115    9.15  $1,430,639   $1,337,925   $92,714    6.93
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

As shown above, the Corporation enjoyed strongwe were able to continue to grow our balance sheet in 2012. The growth since December 31, 2010. The primary driver behind this growthin deposits was excellent demand for deposit products.supplemented by an increase in borrowed funds. As loan demand did not keep pace withgrowth continues to be relatively soft, the increaseadditional funding provided by the growth in borrowings and deposits the Corporation increased its holdings inwere deployed into available-for-sale investment securities. For 2013, we anticipate that deposit growth will continue to be strong and that loan demand will improve.

A discussion of changes in balance sheet amounts by major categories follows:

Certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions

During 2011, the Corporation2012, we reinvested maturities of certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions into available-for-saleAFS investment securities to increase net interest margins (as the yields on available-for-saleAFS investment securities exceeded the potential reinvestment rates for certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions during the year). This trend is likely to continue in 2012.2013.

Trading securities

Trading securities are carried at fair value. The Corporation’sOur overall intent is to maintain a trading portfolio to enhance the ongoing restructuring of assets and liabilities as part of our interest rate riskIRR management

objectives (See(see” Note 4 “Trading4—Trading Securities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Due to the current interest rate environment, the Corporation haswe have allowed this balance to decline.

The following is a schedule of the carrying value of trading securities as of December 31:

   2011   2010   2009 

States and political subdivisions

  $4,710    $5,837    $9,962  

Mortgage-backed

             3,601  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $4,710    $5,837    $13,563  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Available-for-saleAFS investment securities

The primary objective of the Corporation’sour investing activities is to provide for safety of the principal invested. Secondary considerations include the need for earnings, liquidity, and the Corporation’sour overall exposure to changes in interest rates. Securities currently classified as available-for-sale are stated at fair value.

The following is a schedule of the carrying value of investment securities available-for-saleAFS as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012   2011   2010 

Government sponsored enterprises

  $397    $5,404    $19,471    $25,776    $397    $5,404  

States and political subdivisions

   174,938     169,717     151,730     182,743     174,938     169,717  

Auction rate money market preferred

   2,049     2,865     2,973     2,778     2,049     2,865  

Preferred stocks

   5,033     6,936     7,054     6,363     5,033     6,936  

Mortgage-backed securities

   143,602     102,215     67,734     155,345     143,602     102,215  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

   99,101     43,587     10,104     131,005     99,101     43,587  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $425,120    $330,724    $259,066    $504,010    $425,120    $330,724  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Excluding those holdings in government sponsored enterprises and municipalities within the state of Michigan, there were no investments in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of shareholders’ equity. The Corporation hasWe have a policy prohibiting investments in securities that it deemswe deem are unsuitable due to their inherent credit or market risks. Prohibited investments include stripped mortgage backed securities, zero coupon bonds, nongovernment agency asset backed securities, and structured notes. The Corporation’sOur holdings in mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations include only government agencies and government sponsored agencies as the Corporation holdswe hold no investments in private label mortgage-backed securities or collateralized mortgage obligations.

The following is a schedule of maturities of available-for-saleAFS investment securities (at fair value) and their weighted average yield as of December 31, 2011.2012. Weighted average yields have been computed on a fully taxable-equivalentan FTE basis using a tax rate of 34%. AuctionOur auction rate money market preferred securities areis a long term floating rate instrumentsinstrument for which the interest rates arerate is set at periodic auctions. At each successful auction, the Corporation haswe have the option to sell the security at par value. Additionally, the issuers of auction rate securities generally have the right to redeem or refinance the debt. Because of their variable monthly payments,lack of contractual maturities, auction rate money market preferreds,preferred and preferred stocks mortgage-backedare not reported by a specific maturity group. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage

obligations are not reported by a specific maturity group.group due to their variable monthly payments. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.

 

 Maturing      Maturing     
 Within
One Year
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Securities with
Variable Monthly
Payments or

Continual
Call Dates
  Within
One Year
 After One
Year But
Within
Five Years
 After Five
Years But
Within
Ten Years
 After
Ten Years
 Securities with
Variable Monthly
Payments or
Non contractual
Maturities
 
 Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%)  Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) Amount Yield (%) 

Government sponsored enterprises

 $       $       $397    7.91   $       $       $       $73    7.91   $25,703    1.47   $       $      

States and political subdivisions

  8,441    3.24    35,904    4.12    93,189    3.87    37,404    2.84            11,746    3.65    37,686    5.15    92,181    5.15    41,130    3.85          

Mortgage-backed securities

          271    5.68    73,974    1.91    69,357    1.97                            36,626    2.05    118,719    2.15          

Collateralized mortgage

                                  99,101    2.76  

obligations

          

Auction rate money

                                  2,049    4.92  

market preferred

          

Collateralized mortgage obligations

                                  131,005    2.32  

Auction rate money market preferred

                                  2,778    6.29  

Preferred stocks

                                  5,033    4.30                                    6,363    5.76  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

 $8,441    3.24   $36,175    4.13   $167,560    3.01   $106,761    2.28   $106,183    2.88   $11,746    3.65   $37,759    5.15   $154,510    3.81   $159,849    2.59   $140,146    2.56  
 

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Loans

TheLoans are the largest component of earning assets is loans.assets. The proper management of credit and market risk inherent in the loan portfolio is critical to theour financial well-being of the Corporation.well-being. To control these risks, the Corporation haswe have adopted strict underwriting standards. These standards include specific criteria against lending outside the Corporation’sour defined market areas, lending limits to a single borrower, and strict loan to collateral value limits. The CorporationWe also monitorsmonitor and limitslimit loan concentrations extended to distressedspecific industries. The Corporation hasWe have no foreign loans and there were no concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not disclosed as a separate category in the following table.

The following table presents the composition of the loan portfolio for the years ended December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 

Commercial

  $365,714    $348,852    $340,274    $324,806    $238,306    $371,505    $365,714    $348,852    $340,274    $324,806  

Agricultural

   74,645     71,446     64,845     58,003     47,407     83,606     74,645     71,446     64,845     58,003  

Residential real estate mortgage

   278,360     284,029     285,838     319,397     297,937  

Installment

   31,572     30,977     32,359     33,179     29,037  

Residential real estate

   284,148     278,360     284,029     285,838     319,397  

Consumer

   33,494     31,572     30,977     32,359     33,179  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 
  $750,291    $735,304    $723,316    $735,385    $612,687    $772,753    $750,291    $735,304    $723,316    $735,385  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table presents the change in the loan categories for the years ended December 31:

 

  2011 2010 2009   2012 2011 2010 
  $ Change % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change   $ Change   % Change $ Change % Change $ Change % Change 

Commercial

  $16,862    4.8 $8,578    2.5 $15,468    4.8  $5,791     1.6 $16,862    4.8 $8,578    2.5

Agricultural

   3,199    4.5  6,601    10.2  6,842    11.8   8,961     12.0  3,199    4.5  6,601    10.2

Residential real estate mortgage

   (5,669  –2.0  (1,809  –0.6  (33,559  –10.5

Installment

   595    1.9  (1,382  –4.3  (820  –2.5

Residential real estate

   5,788     2.1  (5,669  –2.0  (1,809  –0.6

Consumer

   1,922     6.1  595    1.9  (1,382  –4.3
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 
  $14,987    2.0 $11,988    1.7 $(12,069  –1.6  $22,462     3.0 $14,987    2.0 $11,988    1.7
  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

A substantial portionWe expect loans to increase moderately in 2013, with most of the increasethis growth coming in total loans as of December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 was a result of the acquisition of Greenville Financial Corporation in January 2008. Pursuant to the acquisition, the Corporation purchased gross loans totaling $88,613.

Corporate owned life insurance

During the third quarter of 2011, the Corporation purchased an additional $4,000 of corporate owned life insurance policies. The Corporation purchased these additional policies to provide additional coverage for key employees, while also generating ongoing earnings as the cash surrender values of the policies increase.commercial loans.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values

Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost and investments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see Note“Note“Nature— Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 20 — Fair Value” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).

Deposits

The mainDeposits are our primary source of funds for the Corporation is deposits.funding. The following table presents the composition of the deposit portfolio as of December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2008   2007   2012   2011   2010   2009   2008 

Noninterest bearing deposits

  $119,072    $104,902    $96,875    $97,546    $84,846    $143,735    $119,072    $104,902    $96,875    $97,546  

Interest bearing demand deposits

   163,653     142,259     128,111     113,973     105,526  

NOW accounts

   181,259     163,653     142,259     128,111     113,973  

Savings deposits

   193,902     177,817     157,020     182,523     196,682     228,338     193,902     177,817     157,020     182,523  

Certificates of deposit

   395,777     386,435     356,594     340,976     311,976     376,790     395,777     386,435     356,594     340,976  

Brokered certificates of deposit

   54,326     53,748     50,933     28,185     28,197     55,348     54,326     53,748     50,933     28,185  

Internet certificates of deposit

   31,434     12,178     13,119     12,427     6,246     32,197     31,434     12,178     13,119     12,427  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total

  $958,164    $877,339    $802,652    $775,630    $733,473    $1,017,667    $958,164    $877,339    $802,652    $775,630  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The following table presents the change in the deposit categories for the years ended December 31:

 

  2011   2010   2009   2012 2011 2010 
  $ Change   % Change   $ Change % Change   $ Change % Change   $ Change % Change $ Change   % Change $ Change % Change 

Noninterest bearing deposits

  $14,170     13.5%    $8,027    8.3%    $(671  –0.7%    $24,663    20.7 $14,170     13.5 $8,027    8.3

Interest bearing demand deposits

   21,394     15.0%     14,148    11.0%     14,138    12.4%  

NOW accounts

   17,606    10.8  21,394     15.0  14,148    11.0

Savings deposits

   16,085     9.0%     20,797    13.2%     (25,503  –14.0%     34,436    17.8  16,085     9.0  20,797    13.2

Certificates of deposit

   9,342     2.4%     29,841    8.4%     15,618    4.6%     (18,987  –4.8  9,342     2.4  29,841    8.4

Brokered certificates of deposit

   578     1.1%     2,815    5.5%     22,748    80.7%     1,022    1.9  578     1.1  2,815    5.5

Internet certificates of deposit

   19,256     158.1%     (941  –7.2%     692    5.6%     763    2.4  19,256     158.1  (941  –7.2
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  $80,825     9.2%    $74,687    9.3%    $27,022    3.5%    $59,503    6.2 $80,825     9.2 $74,687    9.3
  

 

   

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

As shown in the preceding table, the Corporation has experienced strong deposit growth since December 30, 2010. This growth was the result of the Corporation offering products with competitive rates and terms, as well as focused marketing efforts to increase deposit market share in the communities served. While management anticipateswe anticipate that deposits will continue to increase in 2012,2013, it is expected to be at a lower rate than 2011.2012. Growth in 2013 is anticipated to continue to come in the form on non-contractual deposits. Certificates of deposits are expected to approximate current levels.

The following table shows the average balances and corresponding interest rates paid on deposit accounts as of December 31:

 

   2011  2010  2009 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Noninterest bearing demand deposits

  $113,726        $102,812        $94,408       

Interest bearing demand deposits

   152,530     0.12  137,109     0.11  116,412     0.13

Savings deposits

   192,999     0.25  169,579     0.23  177,538     0.22

Time deposits

   467,931     2.19  430,892     2.55  398,356     3.27
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total

  $927,186     $840,392     $786,714    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

   2012  2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Noninterest bearing demand deposits

  $125,443     N/A   $113,726     N/A   $102,812     N/A  

Interest bearing demand deposits

   170,851     0.12  152,530     0.12  137,109     0.11

Savings deposits

   214,958     0.21  192,999     0.25  169,579     0.23

Time deposits

   473,675     1.79  467,931     2.19  430,892     2.55
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total

  $984,927     $927,186     $840,392    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

The remaining maturity of time certificates and other time deposits of $100 or more as of December 31, 20112012 was as follows:

 

Maturity        

Within 3 months

  $42,270    $31,319  

Within 3 to 6 months

   25,357     24,323  

Within 6 to 12 months

   63,423     52,684  

Over 12 months

   104,266     128,801  
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $235,316    $237,127  
  

 

   

 

 

Borrowed Funds

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s borrowings as of December 31:

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated maturity dates

   57,198     0.25  45,871     0.25

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates

   16,696     3.51  19,623     3.28

Federal funds purchased

            16,000     0.60
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $216,136     2.42 $194,917     2.56
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The maturity and weighted average interest rates ofBorrowed funds include FHLB advances are as follows as of December 31:

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Fixed rate advances due 2011

  $        $10,086     3.96

One year putable advances due 2011

            1,000     4.75

Fixed rate advances due 2012

   17,000     2.97  17,000     2.97

One year putable advances due 2012

   15,000     4.10  15,000     4.10

Fixed rate advances due 2013

   5,242     4.14  5,337     4.14

One year putable advances due 2013

   5,000     3.15  5,000     3.15

Fixed rate advances due 2014

   25,000     3.16  25,000     3.16

Fixed rate advances due 2015

   45,000     3.30  25,000     4.63

Fixed rate advances due 2016

   10,000     2.15         

Fixed rate advances due 2017

   20,000     2.56  10,000     2.35
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $142,242     3.16 $113,423     3.64
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates are as follows at December 31:repurchase. The balance of borrowed funds fluctuates from period to period based on our funding needs including changes in loans, investments, and deposits. For additional disclosure related to borrowed funds see “Note 10 – Borrowed Funds” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

   2011  2010 
   Amount   Rate  Amount   Rate 

Repurchase agreements due 2011

  $        $858     1.51

Repurchase agreements due 2012

   428     2.08  1,013     2.21

Repurchase agreements due 2013

   5,000     4.51  5,127     4.45

Repurchase agreements due 2014

   10,869     3.12  12,087     3.00

Repurchase agreements due 2015

   399     3.25  538     3.25
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $16,696     3.51 $19,623     3.28
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments

The Corporation hasWe have various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, which may require future cash payments. The following schedule summarizes the Corporation’sour non-cancelable obligations and future minimum payments as of December 31, 2011:2012:

 

  Minimum Payments Due by Period   Minimum Payments Due by Period 
      After One   After Three               After One   After Three         
  Due in   Year But   Years But           Due in   Year But   Years But         
  One Year   Within   Within   After       One Year   Within   Within   After     
  or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total   or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total 

Deposits

          

Deposits with no stated maturity

  $476,627    $    $    $    $476,627    $553,332    $    $    $    $553,332  

Certificates of deposit with stated maturities

   265,299     110,092     99,094     7,052     481,537     205,754     148,427     91,755     18,399     464,335  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total deposits

   759,086     148,427     91,755     18,399     1,017,667  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Borrowed funds

                    

Short term borrowings

   57,198                    57,198     72,717                    72,717  

Long term borrowings

   32,428     96,510     10,000     20,000     158,938     5,000     63,284     50,000     50,000     168,284  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total borrowed funds

   89,626     96,510     10,000     20,000     216,136     77,717     63,284     50,000     50,000     241,001  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total contractual obligations

  $831,552    $206,602    $109,094    $27,052    $1,174,300    $836,803    $211,711    $141,755    $68,399    $1,258,668  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

The CorporationWe also hashave loan commitments that may impact liquidity. The following schedule summarizes the Corporation’sour loan commitments and expiration dates by period as of December 31, 2011.2012. Commitments to grant loans include loans to be sold to the secondary market. Since many of these commitments historically have expired without being drawn upon, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent our future cash requirementsrequirements.

   Expiration Dates by Period 
       After One   After Three         
   Due in   Year But   Years But         
   One Year   Within   Within   After     
   or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total 

Unused commitments under lines of credit

  $69,385    $34,744    $7,934    $3,170    $115,233  

Commitments to grant loans

   40,507                    40,507  

Commercial and standby letters of credit

   3,935                    3,935  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loan commitments

  $113,827    $34,744    $7,934    $3,170    $159,675  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For additional disclosure related to Contractual Obligations and Loan Commitments, see “Note 13 — Off-Balance Sheet Activities” of the Corporation.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

   Expiration Dates by Period 
       After One   After Three         
   Due in   Year But   Years But         
   One Year   Within   Within   After     
   or Less   Three Years   Five Years   Five Years   Total 

Unused commitments to extend credit

  $61,415    $27,740    $10,591    $3,076    $102,822  

Undisbursed loans

   21,806                    21,806  

Standby letters of credit

   4,461                    4,461  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loan commitments

  $87,682    $27,740    $10,591    $3,076    $129,089  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital

The capital of the CorporationCapital consists primarilysolely of common stock, including shares to be issued, retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income. The Corporation offersWe are currently authorized to raise capital through dividend reinvestment, employee and employee, director stock purchases, and shareholder stock purchase plans. Under the provisionspurchases. Pursuant to these authorizations, we issued 124,530 shares of these plans, the Corporation issuedcommon stock generating $2,898 of capital during 2012, and 115,359 shares of common stock generating $2,192 of capital during 2011, and 124,904 sharesin 2011. We also offer the Directors Plan which allows participants to purchase stock units, in lieu of common stock generating $2,203cash payments (see “Note 17 — Benefit Plans” of capital in 2010. The Corporation also generates capital through the Isabella Bank Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (the “Directors Plan”), its equity compensation plan (See Note 17 “Benefit Plans” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Pursuant to this plan, the Corporation generatedwe raised $643 and $615 and $650 of capital in 20112012 and 2010,2011, respectively.

The Board of Directors has adoptedWe have approved a publicly announced common stock repurchase plan. ThisDuring 2012 and 2011, pursuant to this plan, was approved to enable the Corporation to repurchase the Corporation’swe repurchased 83,586 shares of common stock for reissuance to the dividend reinvestment plan, the employee stock purchase planat an average price of $23.69 and for distributions from the Directors Plan. During 2011 and 2010 the Corporation repurchased 120,441 shares of common stock at an average price of $18.30, and 138,970respectively. As of December 31, 2012, we were authorized to repurchase up to an additional 85,410 shares of common stock at an average price of $18.40, respectively.stock.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased $4,198 in 2011 and consists of $5,498 of unrealized gains on available-for-sale investment securities which was offset by a $1,300 increase in unrecognized pension cost. These amounts are net of tax.

There are no significant regulatory constraints placed on our capital. The Federal Reserve Board’sFRB’s current recommended minimum primary capital to assets requirement is 6.0%. The Corporation’s Tier 1Our primary capital to average assets ratio, which consists of shareholders’ equity plus the allowance for loan lossesALL less goodwill and acquisition intangibles, was 8.18%8.29% at December 31, 2011. There are no commitments for significant capital expenditures.2012.

The Federal Reserve BoardFRB has established a minimum risk based capital standard. Under this standard, a framework has been established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and off-balance-sheetoff balance sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. The minimum standard is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of equity capital net of goodwill and acquisition intangibles.goodwill. The following table sets forth the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines and the Corporation’sour values atas of December 31:

 

  2011 2010 Required   2012 2011 Required 

Equity Capital

   12.92  12.72  4.00   13.23  12.92  4.00

Secondary Capital

   1.25  1.25  4.00   1.25  1.25  4.00
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total Capital

   14.17  13.97  8.00   14.48  14.17  8.00
  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation’s secondarySecondary capital includes only the allowance for loan losses. The percentage for the secondary capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed from all sources.

The Federal Reserve BoardFRB and FDIC also prescribesprescribe minimum capital requirements for the Corporation’s subsidiary Bank. At December 31, 2011,2012, the Bank exceeded these minimums.minimum capital requirements. Proposed new capital standards, if enacted, will require us to meet higher capital standards. This increase in capital levels may have an adverse impact on our ability to grow and pay dividends. For further information regarding the Bank’s capital requirements, refer to Notesee “Note 16 “Minimum— Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,Statements.

Fair Value

The Corporation utilizesWe utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale,AFS securities, trading securities, and certain liabilities are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Corporationwe may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, foreclosed assets, originated mortgage servicing rights,OMSR, and certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The table below represents the activity in Level 3 inputs measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31:

   2011  2010 

Level 3 inputs — January 1

  $9,801   $10,027  

Calls

   (1,000    

Transfer to Level 1 inputs

   (5,033    

Transfer to Level 2 inputs

   (2,049    

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities

   (1,719  (226
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Level 3 inputs — December 31

  $   $9,801  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Securities classified as Level 3 in 2010 included securities in less liquid markets and included auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stocks. Due to the limited trading of these securities during 2010, the Corporation utilized a discounted cash flow analysis to determine fair values on December 31, 2010. This analysis considered the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, the current volume of trading activity, and recent trade prices. The discount rates used were determined by using the interest rates of similarly rated financial institution debt based on the weighted average of a range of terms for corporate bond interest rates, which were obtained from published sources and ranged from 3.90% to 6.90% as of

December 31, 2010. During 2011, the markets for these securities have normalized and established regular trading patterns. As a result of this normalization, the Corporation measured preferred stocks with fair values of $5,033 utilizing Level 1 inputs and auction rate money market preferred securities with fair values of $2,049 utilizing Level 2 inputs based on the trade price of similar securities as of December 31, 2011.

For further information regarding fair value measurements see Note“Note“Nature— Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and Note“Note 20 “Fair— Fair Value” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change in interest rates. Management strivesWe strive to achieve reasonable stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing interest rates. One tool used by managementwe use to measure interest rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the following table, the gap analysis depicts the Corporation’sour position for specific time periods and the cumulative gap as a percentage of total assets.

Trading securities are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame due to their repricing characteristics. Fixed interest rate investmentAFS securities are scheduled according to their contractual maturity. Fixed rate loans are included in the appropriate time frame based on their scheduled amortization. Variable rate loans, which totaled $162,653$162,635 as of December 31, 2011,2012, are included in the time frame of their earliest repricing. Time deposit liabilities are scheduled based on their contractual maturity except for variable rate time deposits in the amount of $1,559$1,151 that are included in the 0 to 3 month time frame.

Savings NOW accounts, and money marketNOW accounts have no contractual maturity date and are believed by us to be predominantly noninterest rate sensitive by management.sensitive. These accounts have been classified in the gap table according to their estimated withdrawal rates based upon management’sour analysis of deposit runoffdecay over the past five years. Management believesWe believe this runoffdecay experience is consistent with itsour expectation for the future. As of December 31, 2011, the Corporation2012, we had a negativepositive cumulative gap within one year. A negativepositive gap position results when more liabilities,assets, within a specified time frame, have the potential to mature or reprice than assets.liabilities.

The following table shows the time periods and the amount of assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as of December 31, 2011.2012. The interest rate sensitivity information for investment securities is based on the expected prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities. For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the allowance for loan losses are excluded.

 

   0 to 3  4 to 12  1 to 5  Over 5 
   Months  Months  Years  Years 

Interest sensitive assets

     

Trading securities

  $4,710   $   $   $  

Investment securities

   40,976    63,583    182,965    137,596  

Loans

   59,872    147,565    459,290    77,175  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $105,558   $211,148   $642,255   $214,771  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest sensitive liabilities

     

Borrowed funds

  $67,440   $22,429   $106,267   $20,000  

Time deposits

   74,500    191,206    208,779    7,052  

Savings

   19,591    47,365    103,845    23,101  

Interest bearing demand

   15,621    38,273    82,568    27,191  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $177,152   $299,273   $501,459   $77,344  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cumulative gap

  $(71,594 $(159,719 $(18,923 $118,504  

Cumulative gap as a % of assets

   (5.35)%   (11.94)%   (1.41)%   8.86

   0 to 3  4 to 12  1 to 5  Over 5 
   Months  Months  Years  Years 

Interest sensitive assets

     

Trading securities

  $1,573   $   $   $  

AFS securities

   37,663    86,789    211,184    168,374  

Loans

   194,062    101,725    380,469    89,194  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $233,298   $188,514   $591,653   $257,568  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Interest sensitive liabilities

     

Borrowed funds

  $72,754   $5,111   $113,136   $50,000  

Time deposits

   62,287    143,836    239,813    18,399  

Savings

   6,242    20,903    82,438    118,755  

NOW

   2,163    6,488    30,237    142,371  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

  $143,446   $176,338   $465,624   $329,525  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cumulative gap

  $89,852   $102,028   $228,057   $156,100  

Cumulative gap as a % of assets

   6.28  7.13  15.94  10.91

The following table shows the maturity of commercial and agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2011.2012. Also provided are the amounts due after one year, classified according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.

 

  1 Year   1 to 5   Over 5       1 Year   1 to 5   Over 5     
  or Less   Years   Years   Total   or Less   Years   Years   Total 

Commercial and agricultural

  $120,463    $276,367    $43,529    $440,359    $99,889    $288,297    $66,925    $455,111  
  

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Interest sensitivity

                

Loans maturing after one year that have:

                

Fixed interest rates

    $238,963    $32,178        $231,656    $59,368    

Variable interest rates

     37,404     11,351         56,641     7,557    
    

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

   

Total

    $276,367    $43,529        $288,297    $66,925    
    

 

   

 

       

 

   

 

   

Liquidity

Liquidity is monitored regularly by the Corporation’sour Market Risk Committee, which consists of members of senior management. The committee reviews projected cash flows, key ratios, and liquidity available from both primary and secondary sources.

The primary sources of the Corporation’sour liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, certificates of deposit held in other financial institutions, trading securities, and available-for-sale investment securities, excluding auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred stock AFS securities. These categories totaled $534,968 or 37.4% of assets

as of December 31, 2010 due2012 as compared to their illiquidity. These categories totaled $467,344 or 34.9% of assets as of December 31, 2011 as compared to $360,677 or 29.4% in 2010.2011. Liquidity is important for financial institutions because of their need to meet loan funding commitments, depositor withdrawal requests, and various other commitments discussed in the accompanying notesNotes to consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. Liquidity varies significantly daily, based on customer activity.

The following table summarizes the Corporation’s sources and uses of cash for the years ended December 31:

   2011  2010  $Variance 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $18,860   $26,521   $(7,661

Net cash used in investing activities

   (105,203  (103,877  (1,326

Net cash provided by financing activities

   96,824    70,983    25,841  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   10,481    (6,373  16,854  

Cash and cash equivalents January 1

   18,109    24,482    (6,373
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents December 31

  $28,590   $18,109   $10,481  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TheOur primary source of funds for the Corporation is deposits. The Corporation emphasizes interest bearing time deposits as part of its funding strategy. The Corporationdeposit accounts. We also seeks noninterest bearing deposits, or checking accounts, to expand its customer base, while reducing the Corporation’s cost of funds.

The Corporation hashave the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank,FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank,FRB, and through various correspondent banks as federal funds purchased. These funding methods typically carry a higher interest rate than traditional market deposit accounts. Some borrowed funds, including Federal Home Loan BankFHLB Advances, Federal Reserve BankFRB Discount Window Advances, and repurchase agreements, require the Corporationus to pledge assets, typically in the form of certificates of deposits held in other financial institutions, investment securities, or loans as collateral. As of December 31, 2012, we had available lines of credit of $108,646.

The Corporation hadfollowing table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the ability to borrow up to an additional $110,069, based on the assets currently pledged as collateral. The Corporation has pledged eligible mortgage loans and investment securities as collateral for any such borrowings.

years ended December 31:

   2012  2011  $ Variance 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  $19,464   $18,860   $604  

Net cash used in investing activities

   (101,874  (105,203  3,329  

Net cash provided by financing activities

   78,740    96,824    (18,084
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

   (3,670  10,481    (14,151

Cash and cash equivalents January 1

   28,590    18,109    10,481  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents December 31

  $24,920   $28,590   $(3,670
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Corporation’sOur primary market risks are interest rate risk and liquidity risk. The Corporation hasWe have no significant foreign exchange risk and doesdo not utilize interest rate swaps or derivatives, except for interest rate locks and forward loan commitments, in the management of its interest rate risk.IRR. Any changes in foreign exchange rates or commodity prices would have an insignificant impact on the Corporation’sour interest income and cash flows. The Corporation does have a significant amount of loans extended to borrowers in agricultural production. The cash flow of such borrowers and ability to service debt is largely dependent on commodity prices. The Corporation mitigates these risks by using conservative price and production yields when calculating a borrower’s available cash flow to service their debt.

Interest rate risk (“IRR”)IRR is the exposure of the Corporation’sour net interest income, its primary source of income to changes in interest rates. IRR results from the difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial institution’s interest earning assets and its interest bearing liabilities. IRR is the fundamental method in which financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value. Excessive exposure to IRR could pose a significant risk to the Corporation’sour earnings and capital.

The Federal Reserve Board, the Corporation’s primary Federal regulator,FRB has adopted a policy requiring the Board of Directors and senior managementus to effectively manage the various risks that can have a material impact on theour safety and soundness of the Corporation.soundness. The risks include credit, interest rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. The Corporation hasWe have policies, procedures and internal controls for measuring and managing these risks. Specifically, the IRR policy and procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits on investments in long term assets, limiting the mismatch in repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the frequency of measuring and reporting to the Board of Directors.our Board.

The Corporation usesprimary technique to measure interest rate risk is simulation analysis. Simulation analysis forecasts the effects on the balance sheet structure and net interest income under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in interest rates, the shape of yield curves, interest rate relationships, and loan prepayments. These forecasts are compared against net interest income projected in a stable interest rate environment. While many assets and liabilities reprice either at maturity or in accordance with their contractual terms, several techniquesbalance sheet components demonstrate characteristics that require an evaluation to manage IRR. more accurately reflect their repricing behavior. Key assumptions in the simulation analysis include prepayments on loans, probable calls of investment securities, changes in market conditions, loan volumes and loan pricing, deposit sensitivity and customer preferences. These assumptions are inherently uncertain as they are subject to fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment. As a result, the simulation analysis cannot precisely forecast the impact of rising and falling interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to many other factors, including changes in balance sheet components, interest rate changes, changes in market conditions, and management strategies.

Our interest rate sensitivity is estimated by first forecasting the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of a constant balance sheet and constant market interest rates (base case). We then compare the results of various simulation analyses to the base case. At December 31, 2012, we projected the change in net interest income during the next twelve months assuming market interest rates were to immediately decrease by 100 basis points and increase by 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis points in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve during the same time period. We did not project scenarios showing decreases in interest rates beyond 100 basis points as this is considered extremely unlikely given prevailing interest rate levels. These projections were based on our assets and liabilities remaining static over the next twelve months, while factoring in probable calls and prepayments of certain investment securities and real estate residential and consumer loans. While it is extremely unlikely that interest rates would immediately increase to these levels, we feel that these extreme scenarios help us identify potential gaps and mismatches in the repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities. We regularly monitor our forecasted net interest income sensitivity to ensure that it remains within established limits.

The firstfollowing table summarizes our interest rate sensitivity as of:

   December 31, 2012 

Immediate basis point change asumption (short-term rates)

   –100    0     100    200    300    400  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Percent change in net income vs. constant rates

   –1.61       0.49  –1.58  –1.74  –2.16

   December 31, 2011 

Immediate basis point change asumption (short-term rates)

   –100    0     100    200    300    400  
  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Percent change in net income vs. constant rates

   –1.50       1.34  0.84  –0.78  N/A  

A 400 basis point increase was not applicable as of December 31, 2011 as we were not utilizing this scenario as part of our interest rate sensitivity analysis at that time. We believe our risk associated with changes in interest rates are acceptable.

The secondary method to measure interest rate risk is gap analysis. Gap analysis measures the cash flows and/or the earliest repricing of the Corporation’sour interest bearing assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet. Significant assumptions are required in this process because of the imbedded repricing options contained in assets and liabilities. A substantial portion of the Corporation’s assets are invested in loans and investment securities with issuer call options. Residential real estate and other consumer loans have imbedded options that allow the borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty, while commercial and agricultural loans have prepayment penalties. The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors, including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the current interest rate for residential mortgages,offering rates, the level of sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will result in an increase in the Corporation’s cash flows from these assets. A significant portion of the Corporation’sour securities are callable or subject to prepayment.have prepayment options. The call option isand prepayment options are more likely to be exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Investment securities, other than those that are callable, do not have any significant imbedded options. Savings and checking depositsdemand accounts may generally be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The timing of cash flows from these deposits is estimated based on historical experience. Time deposits have penalties that discourage early withdrawals.

The second technique used in the management of IRR is to combine the projected cash flows and repricing characteristics generated by the gap analysis and the interest rates associated with those cash flows to project future interest income. By changing the amount and timing of the cash flows and the repricing interest rates of those cash flows, the Corporation can project the effect of changing interest rates on its interest income. Based on the projections prepared for the year ended December 31, 2011, the Corporation’s net interest income would decrease slightly during a period of increasing interest rates.

The following tables provide information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 20112012 and 2010. The Corporation has no interest rate swaps, futures contracts, or other derivative financial options.December 31, 2011. The principal amounts of assets and time deposits maturing were

calculated based on the contractual payment and maturity dates. Savings and NOW accounts are based on management’s estimate of their future cash flows. During the first quarter of 2012, we engaged the services of a third party to analyze our historical loan prepayment speeds and non-contractual deposit decay rates. These analyses were prompted by the Office of Thrift Supervision’s discontinuation of publishing its various benchmarks for various loan prepayment speeds and deposit decay rates, which we had previously used for certain loan and deposit accounts (including as of December 31, 2011). As a result of implementing the results of these analyses, the estimated lives of our non-contractual deposit accounts significantly increased, which in turn significantly impacted the corresponding estimated cash flows for these accounts in the following table. We have

reviewed the results of the analyses in detail and feel that it reasonably reflects the prepayment speeds and decay rates of our loan and deposit portfolios.

 

(dollars in thousands) December 31, 2011 Fair Value 
 December 31, 2012 
 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thereafter Total 12/31/11  2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Thereafter Total Fair Value 

Rate sensitive assets

                

Other interest bearing assets

 $8,775   $4,125   $100   $   $   $   $13,000   $13,053   $6,411   $100   $240   $   $   $   $6,751   $6,761  

Average interest rates

  1.18  1.33  0.35              1.22   0.86  0.35  1.25              0.86 

Trading securities

 $3,156   $1,031   $523   $   $   $   $4,710   $4,710   $1,051   $522   $   $   $   $   $1,573   $1,573  

Average interest rates

  3.34  2.48  2.49     3.06   2.68  2.54                  2.63 

Fixed interest rate securities

 $104,559   $61,421   $48,659   $37,777   $35,108   $137,596   $425,120   $425,120  

AFS securities

 $124,452   $83,606   $49,419   $42,655   $35,504   $168,374   $504,010   $504,010  

Average interest rates

  2.98  2.84  2.91  2.93  3.21  3.01  2.98   2.42  2.30  2.53  2.82  2.89  2.48  2.50 

Fixed interest rate loans(1)

 $141,867   $140,390   $90,852   $75,690   $76,985   $61,854   $587,638   $606,524   $138,840   $96,013   $91,353   $85,095   $109,057   $89,760   $610,118   $622,329  

Average interest rates

  6.24  6.08  5.94  5.99  5.40  5.15  5.90   5.74  5.62  5.57  5.21  4.60  4.63  5.26 

Variable interest rate loans(1)

 $70,783   $25,267   $20,803   $18,853   $11,631   $15,316   $162,653   $162,653   $64,482   $28,076   $24,669   $12,650   $22,061   $10,697   $162,635   $162,635  

Average interest rates

  5.87  3.97  4.05  3.68  4.00  3.98  4.78   4.90  3.77  3.96  3.89  3.36  3.90  4.21 

Rate sensitive liabilities

                

Borrowed funds

 $89,869   $15,000   $25,869   $45,398   $20,000   $20,000   $216,136   $227,780   $77,865   $10,814   $42,322   $20,000   $40,000   $50,000   $241,001   $248,822  

Average interest rates

  1.42  3.93  3.13  3.30  2.67  2.56  2.41   0.46  0.65  1.14  2.67  2.15  3.03  1.59 

Savings and NOW accounts

 $120,850   $78,313   $51,291   $34,006   $22,803   $50,292   $357,555   $357,555   $35,796   $32,794   $29,476   $26,520   $23,885   $261,126   $409,597   $409,597  

Average interest rates

  0.20  0.19  0.18  0.17  0.15  0.15  0.18   0.13  0.13  0.12  0.12  0.12  0.11  0.12 

Fixed interest rate time deposits

 $264,147   $62,883   $46,802   $55,493   $43,601   $7,052   $479,978   $498,085   $204,972   $76,373   $71,685   $51,232   $40,523   $18,399   $463,184   $471,479  

Average interest rates

  1.61  2.67  2.33  2.56  2.41  1.48  2.00   1.13  1.69  2.10  2.14  1.72  1.67  1.55 

Variable interest rate time deposits

 $1,152   $407   $   $   $   $   $1,559   $1,559   $782   $369   $   $   $   $   $1,151   $1,151  

Average interest rates

  0.67  0.69                  0.68   0.46  0.45                  0.46 

 

 December 31, 2010 Fair Value  December 31, 2011 
 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Thereafter Total 12/31/10  2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Thereafter Total Fair Value 

Rate sensitive assets

                

Other interest bearing assets

 $10,550   $5,429   $960   $   $   $   $16,939   $17,039   $8,775   $4,125   $100   $   $   $   $13,000   $13,053  

Average interest rates

  0.96  1.82  2.16              1.30   1.18  1.33  0.35              1.22 

Trading securities

 $1,918   $2,366   $1,031   $522   $   $   $5,837   $5,837   $3,156   $1,031   $523   $   $   $   $4,710   $4,710  

Average interest rates

  3.46  2.31  2.42  2.47          2.72   3.34  2.48  2.49              3.06 

Fixed interest rate securities

 $64,652   $42,984   $32,871   $29,395   $24,438   $136,384   $330,724   $330,724  

AFS securities

 $104,559   $61,421   $48,659   $37,777   $35,108   $137,596   $425,120   $425,120  

Average interest rates

  3.68  3.42  3.30  3.33  3.28  3.13  3.32   2.98  2.84  2.91  2.93  3.21  3.01  2.98 

Fixed interest rate loans(1)

 $128,277   $121,434   $140,019   $67,423   $68,569   $66,010   $591,732   $603,435   $141,867   $140,390   $90,852   $75,690   $76,985   $61,854   $587,638   $606,524  

Average interest rates

  6.80  6.63  6.26  6.47  6.08  5.83  6.41   6.24  6.08  5.94  5.99  5.40  5.15  5.90 

Variable interest rate loans(1)

 $59,536   $17,306   $22,523   $15,118   $18,830   $10,259   $143,572   $143,572   $70,783   $25,267   $20,803   $18,853   $11,631   $15,316   $162,653   $162,653  

Average interest rates

  4.94  4.76  4.27  3.78  3.69  5.21  4.55   5.87  3.97  4.05  3.68  4.00  3.98  4.78 

Rate sensitive liabilities

                

Borrowed funds

 $74,151   $33,013   $15,127   $37,087   $25,539   $10,000   $194,917   $200,603   $89,869   $15,000   $25,869   $45,398   $20,000   $20,000   $216,136   $227,780  

Average interest rates

  0.62  3.46  2.55  3.11  4.60  2.35  2.33   1.42  3.93  3.13  3.30  2.67  2.56  2.41 

Savings and NOW accounts

 $74,278   $73,818   $53,174   $35,872   $24,520   $58,414   $320,076   $320,076   $120,850   $78,313   $51,291   $34,006   $22,803   $50,292   $357,555   $357,555  

Average interest rates

  0.21  0.21  0.20  0.19  0.18  0.15  0.19   0.20  0.19  0.18  0.17  0.15  0.15  0.18 

Fixed interest rate time deposits

 $215,648   $113,338   $44,269   $31,414   $39,474   $6,278   $450,421   $452,392   $264,147   $62,883   $46,802   $55,493   $43,601   $7,052   $479,978   $498,085  

Average interest rates

  1.79  2.67  3.35  2.86  2.97  3.26  2.36   1.61  2.67  2.33  2.56  2.41  1.48  2.00 

Variable interest rate time deposits

 $1,279   $661   $   $   $   $   $1,940   $1,940   $1,152   $407   $   $   $   $   $1,559   $1,559  

Average interest rates

  1.21  1.06                  1.16   0.67  0.69                  0.68 

Forward Looking Statements

(1)The fair value reported is exclusive of the allocation of the allowance for loan losses.

This report contains certain forward-looking statements within

We do not believe that there has been a material change in the meaningnature or categories of Section 27Aour primary market risk exposure, or the particular markets that present the primary risk of loss. As of the Securities Actdate of 1933, as amended, and Section 21Ethis report, we do not know of or expect there to be any material change in the general nature of our primary market risk exposure in the near term. As of the Securities Exchange Actdate of 1934, as amended. The Corporation

intends such forward-looking statementsthis report, we do not expect to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements containedmake material changes in those methods in the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describenear term. We may change those methods in the future plans, strategies and expectations of the Corporation, are generally identifiable by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project,” or similar expressions. The Corporation’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future prospects of the Corporation and the subsidiaries include, but are not limitedadapt to changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government including policies of the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the qualitycircumstances or composition of the loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in the Corporation’s market area, and accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further information concerning the Corporation and its business, including additional factors that could materially affect the Corporation’s financial results, is included in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.to implement new techniques.

Common Stock and Dividend Information

The Corporation’sOur common stock is traded in the over the counter market. The common stock is quoted on the OTCQB market tier of the OTC Markets Group, Inc.’s‘s electronic quotation system (www.otcmarkets.com) under the symbol “ISBA”. Other trades in the common stock occur in privately negotiated transactions from time to time of which the Corporationwe may have little or no information.

Management hasOur authorized common stock consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which 7,671,846 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012. As of that date, there were 3,049 shareholders of record.

We have reviewed the information available as to the range of reported high and low bid quotations, including high and low bid information as reported by OTC Markets and as reported by the parties to privately negotiated transactions. The following table sets forth management’sour compilation of that information for the periods indicated. Price information obtained from OTC Markets reflects inter dealerinter-dealer prices, without retail mark up, mark downmark-up, mark-down, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. Price information obtained from parties to privately negotiated transactions reflects actual closing prices that were disclosed to the Corporation,us, which management haswe have not independently verified. The following compiled data is provided for information purposes only and should not be viewed as indicative of the actual or market value of the Corporation’sour common stock.

 

   Number of   Sale Price 
   Shares   Low   High 

2011

      

First Quarter

   48,909    $17.00    $19.75  

Second Quarter

   65,090     17.00     18.50  

Third Quarter

   92,953     17.41     18.95  

Fourth Quarter

   106,210     17.74     24.45  
  

 

 

     
   313,162      
  

 

 

     

2010

      

First Quarter

   45,695    $16.75    $19.00  

Second Quarter

   64,290     17.00     18.50  

Third Quarter

   53,897     16.05     17.99  

Fourth Quarter

   56,534     16.57     18.30  
  

 

 

     
   220,416      
  

 

 

     

   Number of   Sale Price 
   Shares   Low   High 

2012

      

First Quarter

   64,873    $22.15    $24.25  

Second Quarter

   63,656     23.45     24.98  

Third Quarter

   97,706     22.50     24.90  

Fourth Quarter

   87,966     21.60     23.45  
  

 

 

     
   314,201      
  

 

 

     

2011

      

First Quarter

   48,909    $17.00    $19.75  

Second Quarter

   65,090     17.00     18.50  

Third Quarter

   92,953     17.41     18.95  

Fourth Quarter

   106,210     17.74     24.45  
  

 

 

     
   313,162      
  

 

 

     

The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid for the following quarters:

 

   Per Share 
   2011   2010 

First Quarter

  $0.19    $0.18  

Second Quarter

   0.19     0.18  

Third Quarter

   0.19     0.18  

Fourth Quarter

   0.19     0.18  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $0.76    $0.72  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Isabella Bank Corporation’s authorized common stock consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which 7,589,226 shares are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011. As of that date, there were 3,043 shareholders of record.
   Per Share 
   2012   2011 

First Quarter

  $0.20    $0.19  

Second Quarter

   0.20     0.19  

Third Quarter

   0.20     0.19  

Fourth Quarter

   0.20     0.19  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $0.80    $0.76  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The

Our Board of Directors has authorized a common stock repurchase plan. Onplan, which was last amended in April 27, 2011, the Board of Directors amended the plan to allow for the repurchase of an additional 100,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock.2012. These authorizations do not have expiration dates. As shares are repurchased under this plan, they revert back to the status of authorized, but unissued shares.

The following table provides information for the three month period ended December 31, 2011,2012, with respect to this plan:

 

           

Total Number of

Shares Purchased

as Part of Publicly

Announced Plan

     
             

Maximum Number of

Shares That May Yet Be

Purchased Under the

 
   Shares Repurchased     
       Average Price     
   Number   Per Share   or Program   Plans or Programs 

Balance, September 30, 2011

         62,729  

October 1 — 31, 2011

   7,934    $18.78     7,934     54,795  

November 1 — 30, 2011

   1,481     19.58     1,481     53,314  

December 1 — 31, 2011

   34,318     18.50     34,318     18,996  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2011

   43,733    $18.59     43,733     18,996  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
           

Total Number of

Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly

Announced Plan

     
   Shares Repurchased     

Maximum Number of

Shares That May Yet Be

Purchased Under the

 
       Average Price     
   Number   Per Share   or Program   Plans or Programs 

Balance, September 30, 2012

         105,893  

October 1 — 31, 2012

   9,014    $22.52     9,014     96,879  

November 1 — 30, 2012

   5,457     22.91     5,457     91,422  

December 1 — 31, 2012

   6,012     22.79     6,012     85,410  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

   20,483    $22.70     20,483     85,410  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Information concerning Securities Authorizedsecurities authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plansissuance under equity compensation plans appears under “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters” included elsewhere in the Corporation’sour annual report on Form 10-K.

Stock Performance

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Corporation common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on (1) the NASDAQ Stock Market Index (“NASDAQ”), which is comprised of all United States common shares traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Bank Stock Index (“NASDAQ Banks”), which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph assumes the value of an investment in the Corporation and each index was $100 at December 31, 2006 and all dividends are reinvested.

Stock Performance

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return on (1) NASDAQ, which is comprised of all United States common shares traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Banks , which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph assumes the value of an investment in ISBA and each index was $100 at December 31, 2007 and all dividends are reinvested.

Stock Performance

Five-Year Total Return

 

LOGOLOGO

The dollar values for total shareholder return plotted in the graph above are shown in the table below:

Comparison of Five Year Cumulative

Among Isabella Bank Corporation,ISBA, NASDAQ Stock Market,

and NASDAQ Bank Stock

 

Year

  Isabella Bank
Corporation
  NASDAQ  NASDAQ
Banks
  ISBA  NASDAQ  NASDAQ
Banks

12/31/2006

  100.0  100.0  100.0

12/31/2007

  101.6  110.6  80.4  100.00  100.00  100.00

12/31/2008

  66.1  66.6  63.3  65.10  60.20  78.80

12/31/2009

  51.0  96.6  52.9  50.20  87.33  65.86

12/31/2010

  48.5  114.0  60.4  47.80  103.05  75.08

12/31/2011

  69.1  113.1  54.0  68.10  102.26  67.22

12/31/2012

  64.70  120.36  79.73

SHAREHOLDERS’ INFORMATION

Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 1, 2012,7, 2013, Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.

Financial Information and Form 10-K

Copies of the 20112012 Annual Report, Isabella Bank Corporation Form 10-K, and other financial information not contained herein are available on the Bank’s website (www.isabellabank.com) under the Investor RelationsInvestors tab, or may be obtained, without charge, by writing to:

Debra Campbell

Secretary

Isabella Bank Corporation

401 N. Main St.

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

Mission Statement

To create an operating environment that will provide shareholders with sustained growth in their investment while maintaining our independence and subsidiaries’ autonomy.

Equal Employment Opportunity

The equal employment opportunity clauses in Section 202 of the Executive Order 11246, as amended; 38 USC 2012, Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974; Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; relative to equal employment opportunity and implementing rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor are adhered to and supported by Isabella Bank Corporation, and its subsidiaries.

PROXY CARD

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Jeffrey J. Barnes, James C. Fabiano,Sandra L. Caul, and Joseph LaFramboiseW. Michael McGuire as proxies, each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Isabella Bank Corporation that the undersigned is eligible to vote as of March 28, 201226, 2013 at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 1, 20127, 2013 or any adjournments thereof.

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: Proposal to elect the following three (3)four (4) persons as directors. Please mark the appropriate box for each director-nominee.

 

 FOR         AGAINST         WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
Richard J. BarzThomas L. Kleinhardt ¨ ¨ ¨
Sandra L. CaulJoseph LaFramboise ¨ ¨ ¨
W. Michael McGuireWilson Lauer¨¨¨
Sarah Opperman ¨ ¨ ¨

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED UNDER PROPOSAL 1”. The shares represented by this proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies on any other matters which may come before the meeting.

Please sign as your name appears below. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation or other business entity, please sign full corporateentity name, by the President or otheran authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

 

Dated:                        , 20122013             Signature 

Please mark, sign, date, and return

Proxy card promptly using the enclosed

envelope.

 

     Signature
     Signature (if held jointly)